[Quix]

You seem to think I’ve never read such sources.

Decades ago, when I wandered through such docs . . . they were not remotely as convincing as those on the Protty side.

And, I’ve noticed hereon that the better sources on the Protty side do not phase or influence the RUBBER sources on the RC side the least.

Sooooo, I have no great motivation to play that futile game.

Holy Spirit will foster ears to hear and eyes to see amongst whomsoever HE WILL.

Cheers.

[LurkingSince'98]

As I said you have not, will not and can not read Eusibius’ History.

Another All Hat, No Cattle Protestant.

You and your friends tell the Catholics show us some proof.

So we direct you to a 3rd century generally recognized (even by protestants) as an authority and YOU are too busy.

Not too busy - just afraid at what you’ll find.

Lurking’

[Cronos]

Decades ago, when I wandered through such docs . . . they were not remotely as convincing as those on the Protty side

Really? Ok, so the guys who lived 200 years after Christ didn't know about their own times, but guys who lived 1600 years after Christ, i.e. 1400 to 1300 years after the first bunch, that second bunch you consider know more about the first bunch's time?