This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 03/09/2008 5:53:08 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Enough! Flamewar locked. |
Posted on 02/28/2008 4:40:37 PM PST by Alex Murphy
NEW YORK, N.Y. (Catholic League) - Yesterday, Senator John McCain said he was very honored by Pastor John Hagees endorsement.
The Republican presidential hopeful also called Hagee the staunchest leader of our Christian evangelical movement, citing the ministers pro-Israel stance.
Catholic League president Bill Donohue addressed this today:
There are plenty of staunch evangelical leaders who are pro-Israel, but are not anti-Catholic. John Hagee is not one of them. Indeed, for the past few decades, he has waged an unrelenting war against the Catholic Church.
For example, he likes calling it The Great Whore, an apostate church, the anti-Christ, and a false cult system. To hear the bigot in his own words, click here. http://youtube.com/watch?v=uViQ0hVV57Q
Note: he isnt talking about the Buddhists.
In Hagees latest book, Jerusalem Countdown, he calls Hitler a Catholic who murdered Jews while the Catholic Church did nothing. The sell-out of Catholicism to Hitler began not with the people but with the Vatican itself, he writes.
For the record, Hitler persecuted the Catholic Church and was automatically excommunicated in 1931two years before he assumed powerwhen he acted as best man at Joseph Goebbels Protestant wedding. Hitler even bragged about his separation from the Church.
As for doing nothing about the Holocaust, Sir Martin Gilbert reminds us that Goebbels denounced Pope Pius XII for his 1942 Christmas message criticizing the Nazis (the New York Times lauded the pope for doing so in an editorial for two years in a row).
Much to Hagees chagrin, Gilbert also says that Pius XII saved three quarters of the Jews in Rome, and that more Jews were saved proportionately in Catholic countries than Protestant countries. Indeed, Israeli diplomat Pinchas Lapide credited the Catholic Church with saving 860,000 Jews. No religion can match that.
(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...
OK. What esteemed Dr. Eckleburg posts is often and repetitively slander that was refuted as often as she posted it. Can we put it to rest like that?
Yes.
I did a whole thread on the question of "Anti-Catholic bigotry" last year. I would suggest that as a good place to start, for any who wish to pick up on that topic:
Anti-Catholicism: A Phony Issue [Religion Forum Piñata]
On that thread, I had concluded
As I understand it, the author's point is that a statistical minority of Catholics are social conservatives, therefore it's technically incorrect to claim that any bigotry is anti-Catholic and not anti-conservative Catholic. Likewise, the author would say it's technically incorrect to claim that conservative Catholicism represents all of Catholicism, or even a simple majority (remember the 80s bumper sticker "The Moral Majority is Neither"?)In your reply, you quoted the last line and responded "Looks like you buried the article you yourself posted quite effectively."Of course, this argument is utterly and laughably ironic, because it means this political[ly] liberal author is actually arguing in favor of committing bigotry against a statistical minority.
Here's my favorite:
Anti-Catholicism rots the mind. It blinds people and they become obsessed with the destruction of something that they cannot destroy. People have been trying for 2000 years. Churchmen like Roger Mahoney have done their best. But the Gates of Hell will not prevail against it. So this leads to desperation. Which then leads to all kinds of ridiculous theories and outright lies about what Catholics believe and do.
Ah, this is the true meaning of Mk 5:36 (tossed around here earlier, see #155 and previous), -- be not afraid and pray for the dead, bodily as well as spiritually.
However, one who has been corrected each time cannot plead ignorance, can she?
Normal, innocent ignorance no: all who claim Christ are drawn to truth. However, the mentally incompetent or demoniacally influenced are neither normal nor innocent and will persist in their slander for as long as their illness or master bid them too.
We must pray for them and be kind, as Paul instructs; the coals heaped on their head arn't for pain but purification.
John Henry Cardinal Newman
"Since Your Majesty and Your Lordships desire a simple reply, I will answer.
Unless I am convinced by Scripture and by plain reason, and not by Popes and councils who have so often contradicted themselves, my conscience is captive to the word of God. To go against conscience is neither right nor safe. I cannot, and I will not recant. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me." |
Thanks. That proves my point; another lie.
I do not plead ignorance because I have not been corrected.
We disagree, Alex. To Rome, all disagreement is slander and thus it must be shouted down.
In fact, you even pointed out in post #207 that I correctly stated the RCC catechism's view of infant baptism.
But...
Wait for it...wait for it...
We disagree!!!
Infant baptism does not confer saving grace. Infant baptism does not regenerate the fallen sinner. Our sins were forgiven at Calvary, not in the confessional booth where "another Christ" presumes to do what Christ has already done. Not with the help of a "co-redeemer" or a "dispensatrix of all grace" because there is but "one mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus."
Hebrews 10 and Ephesians 1, thank God.
"Although the devil has long reigned in the papacy, yet he could not altogether extinguish God's grace; nay, a church is among them." -- John Calvin, Ezek.I:284 & Ezek. II:120 "God cannot dwell in a profane place...When men introduce their inventions it immediately causes God to depart...
"How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?" -- Hebrews 9:14
That is a "disagree" part. I got scripture, you got Calvin's space-between-the-ears speculation. I am not interested in your views on this: they are worthless and unscriptural.
The slander part is the "Hitler's Pope". On that you get corrected every time you post these lies (I am not ascribing motives here, the gentle reader can do the math in his head).
“Hitler was never excommunicated.” says Dr. Eckleburg!
Perhaps those more articulate than I am can explain in simple words the good “DR”’s misunderstanding of the word “automatically”?
I have found that in Lent, it is better not to argue with our “Brothers and Sisters in Christ” (as they call each other but never us). I have slipped a few times but I’ve also found that since they spout the same stuff all the time, the mod allows (well you know) and we get no where, lent is the perfect time to show a Christlike example and let them rant to their hearts content.
It’s better for all of us.
“It is obvious that water is not salvific.”
Ya think? You may be shocked here xzins but no where does the Holy Catholic Church teach that water alone is anything but, well, water.
Further those who have not yet been baptized who suffer martyrdom are known to be “baptized by blood” and those who die without baptism but who desire it for the Love of God can be believed to have been “baptized by desire”.
Awesome use of FACTS to answer the bigots and those who defend bigotry. Thanks be to God for His Truth on this Feast Day of St. John of God.
“Apparently grave error can be a predestiny too.”
ROTFLMTO!
Narses, you are so close to what I believe that it’s obvious that I’ve made a Methodist out of you.
Welcome to our midst, Christian.
:>)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.