[nicmarlo]

Okay resty....throughout this thread you have repeatedly dodged answering my post #72, denied that Scripture is accurate and to be relied upon, and deflected onto other topics. If I reposted all this in one post, it would be longer than the article of this thread. I repeat, for the third time:

According to whom and in what way, specifically, are the Old and New Testaments a "sanitary version" and what, specifically is "omitten [sic], distorted, or deleted"? Which parts of the Old and New Testaments are in error, specifically? Which rabbi scholars of the Old Testament have found it in error? Which scholars of the Aramaic, Greek, and Hebrew languages have declared it substantively interpreted incorrectly into English?

I now further ask, are only the Old and/or New Testament Scriptures that YOU post the "correct, unsanitized, undistorted, and without error", etc., version?

[Salvation]

Excellent question, FRiend.

[restornu]

You are getting silly and continue to distort my words and all you really know is what you read from someone else and I am not going to solely waste my time on what someone else says I use to do that in the past but I find it is useless for you are going to blindly believe anything contrary to the LDS!

I am so thankful for my Testimony of “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints!

[Elsie]

Okay resty....throughout this thread you have repeatedly dodged answering my post #72, denied that Scripture is accurate and to be relied upon, and deflected onto other topics.

Have fun; now that you've gotten stuck with the TarBaby!!