Posted on 01/27/2008 7:56:14 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg
I agree, the passage does say that and it is the Catholic Sola Gratia teaching. So how, again, does Sola Fide follow from it?
No, consensus patrum means the whole Church. Local or particular churches and individual fathers can be within bounds of orthodoxy and differ on issues that are not dogmatic. Contrary to popular opinion, "orthodoxy" is not a narrow, rigid set of beliefs. Orthodoxy is a solid foundation on which the faith rests. The only restriction is that, in the final analysis, whatever we believe must not violate that foundation, namely the belief in the Holy Trinity, the dual nature of Christ in one Person, the belief in Resurrection, etc.
Since there was no dogma regarding the original sin, St. Augustine's teaching did not constitute "heresy" visa-a-vis the Church in the East, and the Church in the East could dismiss his teaching without making him a "heretic." Part of the Curch could disagree with him and still consider him a Saint in the Orthodox Church.
St. Gregory of Nyssa, one of the three giants, the Cappadocian Fathers, thaught (for a while at least) universal salvation (he used to be Origen's student), but later realized his error and stopped teaching that, otherwise he would have been excommunicated for that teaching because the consensus patrum rejects universal salvation.
Likewise, anyone who taught that Christ was a "lesser" God than the Father, as taught by Arius (Arian heresy) or professed hierarchichal trinity of the Godhead (Gnosticism), as taught by Origen, was given a chance to recant or be excommunicated because this clashes with the foundations of the orthodox faith.
This idea of some variance being allowed within the confines of orthodoxy is evident form the earliest days of the Church. Thus, Hippolytus, an early 3rd century Christian writer left us this regarding the use of epiklesis in the liturgy (my emphases):
The Church always allowed what the Greeks call theologoumenna (theological opinions), with the understanding that they must not include heterodox beliefs but rather remain within the confines of orthodox foundations of the faith as recognized by the whole Church (i.e. consensus patrum), not local councils.
Satan chose too.
God doesn’t set His heart on someone with the command, “This guy is going to love me, or else.”
Even the angels get to choose.
Your view of theology is dangerously flawed. God doesn’t tag people with ‘saved’ or ‘condemned’ before they leave the womb. He may have a plan for each one of us, but its just a plan.
God HAS the power to cut through all that and MAKE something happen. That’s his choice too.
No choice, no love.
I have been busy and away from FR myself as well,Dear Brother.
To answer your question.. No, I do not think it is possible to live a sinless life with the exception of Jesus and Mary(who was full of Grace given to her by God)
That said, I think it is very possible for someone to lead a life without committing grave sin,not venial sin
Harley-""Protestants believe that since the Holy Spirit resides in us, we don't try to avoid sin; rather the Spirit makes it repugnant That is not to say we don't sin ""
If you knowingly commit sin,it's because YOU DID NOT try and avoid the sin and your coscience was not rightly formed
The Formation of Conscience(from the Catechism)
1783 Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened. A well-formed conscience is upright and truthful. It formulates its judgments according to reason, in conformity with the true good willed by the wisdom of the Creator. the education of conscience is indispensable for human beings who are subjected to negative influences and tempted by sin to prefer their own judgment and to reject authoritative teachings.
1784 The education of the conscience is a lifelong task. From the earliest years, it awakens the child to the knowledge and practice of the interior law recognized by conscience. Prudent education teaches virtue; it prevents or cures fear, selfishness and pride, resentment arising from guilt, and feelings of complacency, born of human weakness and faults. the education of the conscience guarantees freedom and engenders peace of heart.
1785 In the formation of conscience the Word of God is the light for our path,54 we must assimilate it in faith and prayer and put it into practice. We must also examine our conscience before the Lord's Cross. We are assisted by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, aided by the witness or advice of others and guided by the authoritative teaching of the Church.55
54 Cf. ⇒ Ps 119:105.
55 Cf. DH 14.
.... The more a man struggles to do good, the more fear grows in him, until it shows him his slightest faults, those which he thought of as nothing while he was still in the darkness of ignorance. ....
.... The sign of perfect fear is the love of virtue and the fear of relapsing, since no one is unalterable.
Thanks for the quote. That sounds pretty compatible. Any desire to be virtuous or do good on our part is love for God.
"Just a plan?" God's plan for His creation, decreed from before the foundation of the world, is "just a plan?"
"Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." -- Isaiah 46:10
God's plan is what is, one way or another.
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?" -- Romans 9:20-21"Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
No choice, no love.
1) Where does it say that in Scripture? Hallmark, yes. The Bible, no.
2) Fallen man will always "choose" unrighteousness unless and until God gives him a new heart, new eyes, new ears and a renewed mind in order for him to know and believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
Read "Bondage of the Will" by Luther. Here's a short, abridged version online...
It will help you understand whose will is sovereign and whose will has been mercifully over-ridden by the gift of unmerited, unearned, free grace.
"For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure." -- Philippians 2:13
Traditions of men.
No, just an excellent, truthful, Scripturally-faithful book by a man.
We must pray diligently for the world’s people.
To be precise, everyone is currently condemned to hell who does not believe on the Lord Jesus. If, under your soteriology, someone is sitting on the fence trying to decide, they are condemned to hell because, by definition, they do not believe in our Lord Jesus. It's difficult to say "..sin is condemnation to hell" but not part of original sin because everyone is a sinner and that is because of original sin.
It's all part of the same curse. That original sin curse said we would die. The wages of sin is death. The two are interconnected.
Unceasingly.
That would include groups like LDS or Jehova's Witnesses. Sorry.
Original sin and actual sin are, of course, connected, but should you care to examine the connection scripturally, you would discover that there is no warrant to say that original sin alone condemns to hell.
The Church does not teach that absence of believe in Jesus condemns to hell apart from anything else, either. Factors such as obedience to natural law in invincible ignorance of the teaching of the Church offer a hope of salvation to non-Christians.
There is no hope for those outside Christ.
Rom 1:21 Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, neither were thankful. But they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
kosta-Wow, that's pretty bombastic! The Greeks who read the original in their language disagreed then and do so to this day.
I haven't had the time to read all the arguments out here but I believe FK touched upon the logic of original sin. If you were to take civilization throughout all of history, you cannot produce one person who history recorded as without sin except for Christ (we'll leave the discussion of Mary for another time). Statistically speaking, if original sin was left up to man, then 50% of mankind should be sinful and 50% should be pure. Yet not one can be produce who was without sin.
One thing is certain: the words in Rom 5:12 are sloppily wirtten and ambiguous enough to cause different opinions
On the contrary, I think they are perfectly clear and people just don't wish to acknowledge original sin. The reason is clear. They believe they are in control of their live able to make decisions. Let me ask you this, do you want to sin? Do you consciencely make a "free" choice to sin against God exercising your "free will"?
Your answer tells me you either didn't read it at all or you didn't understand it at all.
There was no redemption before Incarnation.
Your verses are completely off the mark, HD. They do not show that there is no hope outside of Christ.
God must give them a new heart and a new mind to walk in His wa
Christ says that He will heal our hearts, not give us new ones. He came to restore, not to re-create. You need to read the New Testament if you consider yourself a Christian. Is Ezekiel right and Christ is wrong?
It is nice to teach that non-believers can believe what they want and still get to heaven but that was not the belief of the early church
Then the early Church did not believe that with God everything is possible. I doubt that. Invincible ignorance is not a sin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.