Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591
Why would one endorse a candidate who doesn't support a Human Life Amendment (Thompson) and can't win over one who does (Romney) and can win?

a) The President has no constitional role in the amendment process. None.

b) Your can't-win/can-win analysis is your speculation.

c) Even National Right to Life recognizes that the HLA is not passing any time soon.

This is just a Willardian wedge talking point meant to obscure Slick Willard's pro-abortion very-recent-past.

109 posted on 01/13/2008 9:12:49 AM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

Well, I’m not using it as a wedge. I prefer candidates who support the HLA (as Reagan did) and Marriage Amendments, even if the HLA will be long time coming.


111 posted on 01/13/2008 9:27:05 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary and Obama!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson