Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski

Well, I’m not using it as a wedge. I prefer candidates who support the HLA (as Reagan did) and Marriage Amendments, even if the HLA will be long time coming.


111 posted on 01/13/2008 9:27:05 AM PST by TAdams8591 ((Mitt Romney '08, THE ONLY candidate who can defeat Giuliani and Hillary and Obama!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591
I agree. We all know that the HLA is an uphill battle, but why start with a strike against you with a president who doesn't even believe in it to begin with? To me, it is mind-boggling that right-to-life organizations are endorsing someone who does not support (by his own admission on Meet the Press) their ultimate goal -- Ronald Reagan's HLA.

While a president does not have a magic wand that can stop all abortions overnight, certainly having someone in the Oval Office who will use the bully pulpit to further the cause is preferable to someone who will not (same goes for the Federal Marriage Amendment too).

114 posted on 01/13/2008 9:47:39 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate (Unite 4 Mitt - Stop Huck, McCain & Rudy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson