Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priestesses a no-show (at STL Church tribunal)
Closed Cafeteria ^ | December 6, 2007 | Gerald Augustinus

Posted on 12/07/2007 7:32:11 AM PST by NYer

Photo: Jennifer Silverberg

From the Riverfront Times blog

Immediately after being ordained on November 11 as part of the Roman Catholic Womenpriest Program, Hudson and McGrath were greeted by a special process server in the lobby of the Central Reform Congregation. That would be the same process server who, six days before their ordination, delivered the women the official word that they would be automatically excommunicated by going through with their planned ordination. This time the process server appeared with a letter from the archbishop stating that Hudson and McGrath were “summoned” to appear “personally before [him]” at 10 a.m. on Monday, December 3, in order to defend themselves against the charges of “schism” and “rejection of the definitive truth, de fide tenenda, infallibly set forth that women cannot validly receive the sacrament of ordination to the priesthood.”
Hudson and McGrath were MIA Monday.

“Failure to appear,” according to Burke’s letter, “will entail the imposition of an ecclesiastical penalty in [their] regard, according to the provisions of the Code of Canon Law.”

McGrath says she and Hudson did not consider showing up for the hearing. “We would have had one of two options at the tribunal. One: to plead guilty to the charges of heresy and schism and recant, which is, of course, a lie. Or two: to prove that we’re right and they’re wrong, which is, of course, impossible. There’s another reason, too, for not going, and that is to demonstrate that a mere man who presumes to speak for God has no power over us. Were we to have attended the hearing, we would be granting him a position of authority, which is one of the very things we want to eradicate in our model of priestly ministry.”

McGrath says she and Hudson don’t know what further penalties Burke might have in mind for them. “He considers us excommunicated,” McGrath adds. “We do not consider ourselves excommunicated.”

In the women's defense, the archdiocese failed to provide them with a large print edition of the letters.

(yes, yes that's an "ageist" joke - here's another one: They failed to show at 10am cause they didn't want to miss the Earlybird Special)


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: femalepriests; priestess; priestette; religiousleft; womynpriest

1 posted on 12/07/2007 7:32:12 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

Arrogant!


2 posted on 12/07/2007 7:32:34 AM PST by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It’s official. They’re protestants. Now can the MSM please stop referring to them as “Catholics”?


3 posted on 12/07/2007 7:35:34 AM PST by Antoninus (Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Isn’t “The View” on at 10 am locally?
No way they could make a 10 am appointment.


4 posted on 12/07/2007 7:35:45 AM PST by steve8714 (The last actor elected POTUS turned out OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Or two: to prove that we’re right and they’re wrong, which is, of course, impossible.

You said it, sister.

5 posted on 12/07/2007 8:12:16 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Cowardesses.


6 posted on 12/07/2007 8:28:44 AM PST by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
There’s another reason, too, for not going, and that is to demonstrate that a mere man who presumes to speak for God has no power over us. Were we to have attended the hearing, we would be granting him a position of authority, which is one of the very things we want to eradicate in our model of priestly ministry.

They aren't priests, and they aren't Catholics, either.

7 posted on 12/07/2007 9:28:46 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
It was Monday fer goodness sakes!

It was a Holy Day of Obligation on the pagan calendar. Check it out. I think it was Thor's birthday.

Burke needs to be reasonable.

8 posted on 12/07/2007 9:33:16 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"Were we to have attended the hearing, we would be granting him a position of authority, which is one of the very things we want to eradicate in our model of priestly ministry.”

Oh. Well, THIS makes everything all right, then.

9 posted on 12/07/2007 10:38:35 AM PST by redhead (VICTORY FIRST, THEN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Aw, jeez. You don’t really think that the Missouri Synod, for instance, allows the ordination of priestesses (whether lesbaian or not).


10 posted on 12/07/2007 11:52:39 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

So what’s the next move? I assume Burke won’t let them into any of his churches, and they can go play pretend priestess in the condominium of their choosing.


11 posted on 12/07/2007 12:01:10 PM PST by COBOL2Java (The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I think it was Thor's birthday.

No, no, that's on Thursday. I think they were in preparation to worship the moon;)

12 posted on 12/07/2007 1:15:36 PM PST by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Or two: to prove that we’re right and they’re wrong, which is, of course, impossible.

SD: You said it, sister.

Major blunder on her part. Proof of rational thought. Her insanity defense just went crashing out the window.

13 posted on 12/07/2007 1:20:45 PM PST by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Archbishop Burke's column: "Be Not Afraid"

Given the most sacred nature of the sacraments which will be simulated, the women involved and any Catholic who knowingly and deliberately assists them risks the eternal salvation of their souls. They commit mortal sin. Because of the most grave, public and obstinate nature of the proposed act of attempted ordination, the Church automatically applies medicinal penalties to the parties who complete the act. Medicinal penalties, for example, excommunication and interdict, are aimed at calling the persons away from their sin and to reconciliation with Christ and His Church. The women involved have been duly admonished regarding the penalties which they will incur, should they proceed with the attempted ordination. Any medicinal penalties or censures incurred will be appropriately declared, so that the ecclesial status of the parties involved may be clear for all.

I urge you, therefore, to offer fervent prayers for the women involved, that they will repent and be reconciled with the Church. Please pray, too, for all who will be confused and led astray by their sinful action.

14 posted on 12/07/2007 2:28:42 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson