Posted on 11/14/2007 8:28:07 AM PST by fortcollins
Ishmael was not born of the covenant of God with regard to Isaac (See Galatians, chapters 2 and 3 if memory serves). Later God DID say He would multiply the Arab, but certainly this wasn’t Islam.
Islam claims ISHMAEL was THE heir to the Promise, which like virtually everything else islamic, is a twisted lie contrary to Biblical truth.
Hence for this article to claim “Abraham” is a prophet of islam, as islam falsely claims, is also another fallacy built upon mad mo’s lies.
NAsbU Genesis 22:2 He said, "Take now your son, And :
shalom b'shem Yah'shua
your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and
offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I
will tell you."
And Andres Celsius gave us water freezing at 100 degrees in his own scale!
We moved on from there too...
not surprised.....the RCC doesn't recognize Baptist baptisms, and the Baptists don't recognize RCC baptisms......actuallt, Baptists have a dificult time recognizing ANY Baptisms ....and I wonder if the RCC recognize other Baptisms (I don't know that answer).
“I believe that most Mormons are Christians first and are living their lives focusing on strong family ties and living righteously.”
You are wrong.
I’ve been known to be wrong before.
Not like God is sitting up there waiting to send my soul to Hell if I make myself look like an ass on FR.
“Well, Christ is also referred to” and so forth and so on....
I was responding to rface who wrote “Christ did NOT say the Bible was the word of God.”
Of course He did. But the new testament was written after His death, correct?
Anywho, God made us sentient beings (or we helped ourselves to that gift in the garden) so we could read and understand.
But He didn’t cite chapter and verse, as He could with the old books, because they were still in the heads of his disciples.
By that I mean he didn’t say, “Well, in Book so and so, subchapter viii. I urged any without sin to cast the first stone.” Because He was busy doing all these things.
Okey dokey?
Nice sermon though . . .
I wonder if the Coptic church or the Orthodox church or the Armenian church have a different book or two within their Bible? That's something for me to research
Water boils at 100, freezes at 0.
They also have a difficult time recognizing each other at the liquor store.
Looking in mirror, I can agree with you on that!
;)
The RCC isn’t the end all to be all for churches, only god can determine if a baptism is valid or not.
And yet... when he gave it to us.... (check out wikipedia)
Yeah, I recalled it being preached on down that Pilate called Him the Son of God and Jesus plead the 5th.
And you are judgemental, probably the same attribute you credit to Mormons.
You're going to have to source that... good luck.
... and the Baptists don't recognize RCC baptisms...
This is true.
...and I wonder if the RCC recognize other Baptisms (I don't know that answer).
The Church doesn't "rebaptize" those who have been baptized in the Trinitarian formula.
Actually, in most scientific circles. Farenheit was the one that was “moved on” from, not Celcius. Farenheit is only used in America and in places where fractions of Celcius degrees are useless like culinary studios.
To the deceived, the facts really don’t matter.
A good feeling in the belly easily seems to trump any logic that might be given.
However, the true Word of God does and can cut through the deception.
We don’t rely on logic alone, but the true Word of God (the Bible only) is very logical.
“In the beginning was the LOGOS,
and the LOGOS was with God,
and the LOGOS was God.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.