Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joseph Smith: Creator of the Fourth Abrahamic Faith; Mormonism
Auhtor's website ^ | September 15, 2007 | G. Richard Jansen

Posted on 11/14/2007 8:28:07 AM PST by fortcollins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,461-1,466 next last
To: nesnah
Mormons refer to the Catholic Church as the “whore of babylon”.

That's nothing. In the Lutheran Book of Concord we equate the office of the pope with the Antichrist. Let's see, whore or Antichrist. I think we win.

81 posted on 11/14/2007 9:37:08 AM PST by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

thanks for the info. I am now better learned


82 posted on 11/14/2007 9:37:23 AM PST by rface (kooky inside and out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: rface
"What were Christians before the Nicene Creed?"

Pretty much the same as after only now they had the Creed to use in battling the heresies of the Gnostics, Donatists, Montanists, etc. etc.

83 posted on 11/14/2007 9:39:33 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fortcollins
Joseph Smith: Creator of the Fourth Abrahamic Faith; Mormonism,

Unless the LORD builds the house, They labor in vain who build it; (Psalm 127:1)

84 posted on 11/14/2007 9:42:41 AM PST by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
Pretty much the same as after only now they had the Creed to use .....

I am not so sure. I do know that it was quite a battle between Christians....back in the day.....to actually come up with a Creed that could more-or-less, be agreed upon.

85 posted on 11/14/2007 9:43:00 AM PST by rface (kooky inside and out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; rface
How do the different sects (denominations?) of Christians recognize other Christians?

ping

86 posted on 11/14/2007 9:43:41 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fortcollins

I guess the bottom line to the Mormon religon has to do with this:

Would you trust a guy that places two rocks in a hat, covers his face with said hat, and dictates (ahem, translates) an alleged religious work that is not even in his presence?

That’s how it happened, and, if you believe Joseph Smith, then may I interest you in a parcel of ocean-front land I have for sale in Arizona?


87 posted on 11/14/2007 9:43:44 AM PST by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blowtorch

No, I just don’t credit them with something they are not. That is not judgmental that is being factually correct. If you go out and claim to be a lawyer but you cannot produce that law degree and bar exam result then you were not and can be prosecuted under law. That is not being judgmental that is just being identified for what you are or are not. If you do not fill the requirements for being a Christian then you are not one no matter what you claim.

If they want to be known as a Christian they need to renounce the Book of Mormon and the Mormon belief in salvation and the Godhead and accept Christ as the only way to everlasting life period.


88 posted on 11/14/2007 9:48:22 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rface
The Creed divided the Christians into Christian and Arian. The Creed didn't eliminate the Arians, it just split them out. It was a contributing factor to the fall of the Roman Empire. The Arians existed well past the Roman Empire and into the Germanic kingdoms. I think the Arians died out about the 8th century.
89 posted on 11/14/2007 9:49:19 AM PST by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: rface
How do the different sects (denominations?) of Christians recognize other Christians?

If someone tells me that they are going to become a god and rule their own world, I can easily recognize that they aren't a Christian.

91 posted on 11/14/2007 9:49:52 AM PST by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fortcollins

92 posted on 11/14/2007 9:50:39 AM PST by TheDon (The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

Furthermore, Joseph Smith was dictating to a gullible disciple, who quit his job to take dictation (since Joe could read a little, but could not write).
They were separated by a blanket hung on a line because Joe was concerned that the sight of the golden tablets would make the novice go blind. Or something.
The secretary’s wife showed up, confiscated all the notes (and her husband) and then challenged Joe to either repeat the first page or two of revelations, or a reasonable fascsimile, so she could compare them to the preserved `gospel’.
Joe punted and found another set of tablets. And a bachelor secretary.


93 posted on 11/14/2007 9:51:04 AM PST by tumblindice ("Religion poisons everything." Christopher Hitchens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SwankyC

Someone correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure I’ve read that he never showed anyone the golden plates. He

That is incorrect. A total of 11 people were shown the plates, including 3 who testified that they were shown the plates, at the same time, by an angel. 12 saw the plates if you include Smith’s wife who handled them. Of these 11, all were allowed to handle the plates and examine them.

Here is the statement of the 3 who were shown the plates by an angel: http://scriptures.lds.org/en/bm/thrwtnss

Here is the statement of 8 others who were allowed to examine the plates with no angelic ministrant involved: http://scriptures.lds.org/en/bm/eghtwtns

All of the 11 stood by their testimonies of having seen the plates and in the case of the 3 the angels throughout their life even though several fell away from the church, though some later returned.


94 posted on 11/14/2007 9:53:09 AM PST by Hillary4Penetentiary ("I hope Hillary is elected" Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tao Yin

I like your sense of humor......

:-)

all in good fun.....


95 posted on 11/14/2007 9:54:21 AM PST by fishtank ("Patriotic Nationalism?" - YES!!!....."Globalist Multiculturalism?" - NO!!!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
and the Bible is the infallible Word of God

Which version? If the Bible is the infallible Word of God then I want to make sure I have the infallible version. Nobody has yet been able to tell me which it is. Why is that? And if the Bible is infallible then why do we keep getting new and updated translations that say different things?

They also place the Book of Mormon above the Bible as pathway to salvation.

False. The Bible even gets top billing in our Articles of Faith. We consider the King James Version the most correct translation of the Bible.

We consider the Book of Mormon at most equal to the Bible, but it is not complete. The BoM will even tell you as much directly. The Bible will even tell you it is not complete if you read it, though not directly.

96 posted on 11/14/2007 9:56:09 AM PST by Domandred (Eagles soar, but unfortunately weasels never get sucked into jet engines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nesnah
LOL, talk about a straw man argument. You just pick up the word "cult," and then conveniently fit some aspects of the Mormon church to fit that definition, some of which weren't even accurate by the way. Dictionary.com defines the word cult to mean simply this, not the contrived definition you cooked up: Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This cult /kʌlt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kuhlt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies. 2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, esp. as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult. 3. the object of such devotion. 4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc. 5. Sociology. a group having a sacred ideology and a set of rites centering around their sacred symbols.
97 posted on 11/14/2007 9:56:23 AM PST by Hillary4Penetentiary ("I hope Hillary is elected" Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Blowtorch
Hey, the Pharisees were living their lives focusing on living righteously, but for some reason, Jesus didn't speak too well of them (just look at John 8). I didn't know the Pharisees believed in Christ. Oh, wait, they didn't. Not a very accurate comparision.

The Pharisees claim the same heritage as do the Mormons (Abraham). At the time of Christ's earthly "visit," the Jews were indeed considered as God's covenant people and sought godly righteousness. (The only ones then who "believed" in Jesus were his disciples and some of those who had seen his miracles.)

98 posted on 11/14/2007 9:56:27 AM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

I think in my church, that we WOULD recognize an RCC baptism if it were an adult believer’s baptism (of course in the RCC, it WOULD be Trinitarian), and if the individual is certain that at the point of their adult baptism that they had come to a saving faith in Jesus Christ.

We wouldn’t ‘recognize’ an infant baptism, though.

Disclaimer:

I go to an independent non-denominational evangelical Protestant church.


99 posted on 11/14/2007 9:58:47 AM PST by fishtank ("Patriotic Nationalism?" - YES!!!....."Globalist Multiculturalism?" - NO!!!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Not exactly correct, but close enough. Actually, the first person Old Joe enlisted to be his scribe was a wealthy bumbler named Martin Harris. It was his wife that saw through the ruse and got her hands on the first 116 pages that had been dictated. She felt that if Old Joe was truly dictating/translating, that it would be a simple task to re-do those 116 pages that were now ‘lost’. But, Old Joe had his-self a bit of a problema, as he knew he could not re-dictate word for word, so he came up with some excuse about using another set of plates. The story would be basically the same, just told a little differently.


100 posted on 11/14/2007 9:59:46 AM PST by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,461-1,466 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson