Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letter to Bishops Re New ICEL Translation (National Coalition of American Nuns)
NCAN -- National Coalition of American Nuns ^ | October 21, 2007 | Member of the Board - NCAN

Posted on 10/22/2007 6:26:46 AM PDT by maryz

To Each U.S. Roman Catholic Bishop Regarding English Translations For The Liturgy

Dear Bishop, We are writing to you, each U.S. bishop, the U.S. Bishops' Committee on the Liturgy, the International Committee on English in the Liturgy (ICEL), and the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments in regard to the new Vatican-ordered translation of the Liturgy. The Vatican-appointed translators have not produced a translation that is understandable to Catholics in the pews. We understand that, according to a 2005 poll of bishops, 47% of the U.S. bishops rated it "fair or poor". The media has reported that even some bishops are complaining that some texts contain "clunky and archaic language". For example, why would the words "consubstantial to the Father" be used in the Creed? What meaning do these words have for 21st century English speaking Catholics? Why use a medieval expression like, "We pray you bid" in the new Missal? This is not the way people speak today in the English-speaking world. We need to follow the liturgical principles set forth in the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy from the Second Vatican Council. Article 21 of that document states, "Christian people, as far as possible, should be able to understand them (texts and rites) with ease". The proposed text, "he who was born ineffably of the inviolate Virgin," is not easily understandable to Christian people, much less to the youth who are leaving the Church because of its irrelevancy. Bishop Donald Trautman of Erie, PA., chair of the U.S. Bishops Committee on the Liturgy, has said the proposed changes by the International Commission on English in the Liturgy are "not acceptable". We agree. We ask you to make the translations appropriate, meaningful, and significant for today's Catholic.

Jeannine Gramick SL,
Donna Quinn OP,
Beth Rindler SFP
For the Board of the National Coalition of American Nuns


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: icel; liturgy; ncan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Sr. Jeannine Gramick . . . didn't she used to be somebody? ;-)
1 posted on 10/22/2007 6:26:48 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: livius; sneakers; Mercat; NYer

I believe it was livius who used the phrase, referring to the bishops’ attitude toward what used to be known as “the faithful,” the “drooling idiots in the pews.” ;-)


2 posted on 10/22/2007 6:28:45 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz

When I teach my children, I hold them to the highest standards they can achieve. This has brought them two grade levels above where they would be in PS.

I think we adults can handle the language. If we don’t understand it, there is a dictionary after all!


3 posted on 10/22/2007 6:34:46 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Sr. Jeannine Gramick . . . didn't she used to be somebody? ;-)

Nope. She's not a "has-been" ... she's a "never-was".

4 posted on 10/22/2007 6:40:47 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz

If they don’t understand it is because you, sisters, have not been teaching well.

Or maybe you don’t understand.

Or perhaps, the truth of the matter is that you do not believe.


5 posted on 10/22/2007 6:40:56 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Exactly! I remember the old Baltimore Catechisms; even Baltimore 1, which we used in 1st, 2nd and 3rd grade taught us in the proper words, and included a glossary at the end of each chapter for words that might be new to us.

With new words added to the language all the time -- many of them unavoidably technical -- that nobody seems to have any problem with, what's another handful of proper terminology?

6 posted on 10/22/2007 6:42:56 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maryz
The proposed text, "he who was born ineffably of the inviolate Virgin," is not easily understandable to Christian people,

Then teach 'em English in Catholic Elementary School.

much less to the youth who are leaving the Church because of its irrelevancy.

Part of the "irrelevancy" is the watering down of doctrine and pandering to popular culture perpetrated by the likes of "Sister" Jeannine.

7 posted on 10/22/2007 6:43:34 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Well, I guess the nuns are real busy -- check their website: they also have a letter re the impeachment of Bush and Cheney and (apparently) global warming. They're also taking a courageous stand against poverty in Africa, presumably against all those mean, nasty, powerful people who are for poverty in Africa!
8 posted on 10/22/2007 6:46:30 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Ewwww. I feel dirty.

Since 1969, NCAN has been working, studying and speaking out on justice issues in Church and Society. trying to destroy the Church from within.

There. Fixed it for 'em.

Did you see their "NCAN Links"? "The Vatican" (I guess that's their attempt to pass themselves off as Catholic), and five of "Modern Heresy's Greatest Hits".

9 posted on 10/22/2007 6:51:35 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Deer Sistr Gramkick:

Tank you fur ryting to the bishups. I’m a Catlic gy hoo duznt unnerstan wurds lyk “comstubstitial” eethur. Da nyoo translashin isnt opropreate ur meeningfull too mee as a man uf the Twunnyfirs Senchry. Vaticum Cownsul passt a law that sed evvrywun’s got to unnerstan tha preest when he prezydz on the wurship survice. I don wanna lurn to tawk the midevil tawk on Sundy bicuz iss not acxeptibul.

Pleaz keap up the gud wurck.

-Clawd frum FreReapublick


10 posted on 10/22/2007 6:53:41 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz
The proposed text, "he who was born ineffably of the inviolate Virgin," is not easily understandable to Christian people, much less to the youth who are leaving the Church because of its irrelevancy.

Oh, I see what it is... She's just worried about the vast multitude of young nuns who have joined all of the orders that are trying to be 'relevant' by shedding all of those nasty symbols of rigidity like habits and embracing compassionate social action instead of traditional modes of contemplation and teaching.

</sarc>

In all seriousness... what it means for Christ to be "he who was born ineffably of the inviolate Virgin" would make a great homily reflection.

11 posted on 10/22/2007 6:55:54 AM PDT by GCC Catholic (Sour grapes make terrible whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud
LOL! Yes, it's the poor, downtrodden illiterates like YOU, Claud, that Sr. Gramick wants to keep downtrodden and illi-- uh, help, yes -- that's it, help!
12 posted on 10/22/2007 6:56:55 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
In all seriousness... what it means for Christ to be "he who was born ineffably of the inviolate Virgin" would make a great homily reflection.

Yes! Great idea.

I love "we pray you bid" as well! Glad to see the bishops sticking up for more hieratic English.

Now if we can just get thee and thou back...

13 posted on 10/22/2007 7:22:13 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maryz; NYer

I guess all those Eastern Rite Catholics are just a lot smarter than us.


14 posted on 10/22/2007 7:32:53 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Now if we can just get rid of the execrable music.


15 posted on 10/22/2007 7:35:01 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Dear Sister, some of us pew sitters ain’t quite as dumb as you wish we were.


16 posted on 10/22/2007 7:35:02 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

It strikes me that it’s the same groups who are for the dumbed-down translations and absolute avoidance of Latin as “too hard” are the ones who are calling for greater “transparency” in church finances and more lay involvement — because lay people are so much more educated than in the past!


17 posted on 10/22/2007 7:42:13 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: maryz
The devil flails around the most frantically just before he is about to be exorcised. These broads are desperate.
18 posted on 10/22/2007 7:48:41 AM PDT by magisterium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz
The proposed text, "he who was born ineffably of the inviolate Virgin," is not easily understandable to Christian people, much less to the youth who are leaving the Church because of its irrelevancy.

Yeah...and wot about dat recent "mow-two prop-ree-oh", eh? Wot wuz dat about?

I believe Sr. Jeannine and her pals are "strippers".

They're out to strip the Church of anything that speaks of mystery and majesty, whether it be liturgy, architecture or music.

"Get thee to a nunnery, wench!!"

19 posted on 10/22/2007 9:23:55 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz

“Jeannine Gramick SL,”

Yeah, that’s all I needed to know. Ignore.


20 posted on 10/22/2007 9:38:00 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson