Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CT Bishops Allow Plan B in Catholic Hospitals for Rape - Catholic Medical Assoc Opposed
LifeSite ^ | September 28, 2007 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 09/29/2007 3:04:58 PM PDT by NYer

HARTFORD, September 28, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A statement issued by the Connecticut Catholic Bishops yesterday, which is posted on the Catholic Conference's web page, notes that the Bishops have approved the administration of the morning after pill Plan B for rape victims at the four Catholic hospitals in the state.  While the Bishops claim to be in accord with Church teaching on the matter, the only statement from the Vatican on the measure opposed it since the pill can cause abortions.

"In accordance with Catholic moral teaching, these hospitals provide emergency contraception after appropriate testing," says the letter from the Bishops.  "Catholic moral teaching is adamantly opposed to abortion, but not to emergency contraception for victims of rape," it adds.

However, the Vatican statement on the morning after pill, issued in 2000, condemns its use outright.  The Pontifical Academy for Life states that "the absolute unlawfulness of abortifacient procedures also applies to distributing, prescribing and taking the morning-after pill. All who, whether sharing the intention or not, directly co-operate with this procedure are also morally responsible for it." (see the full Vatican statement here: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdli...

The morning after pill works in three ways:  To slow motility of the sperm, to inhibit ovulation and to prevent implantation of the embryo.  The Vatican document stated: "It is clear, therefore, that the proven 'anti-implantation' action of the morning-after pill is really nothing other than a chemically induced abortion.  It is neither intellectually consistent nor scientifically justifiable to say that we are not dealing with the same thing."

The bishops of Connecticut suggest that the administration of a pregnancy test prior to administration of Plan B puts sufficient doubt into the question of whether or not the abortifacient effect of the pill will be engaged.  "The administration of Plan B pills in this instance cannot be judged to be the commission of an abortion because of such doubt about how Plan B pills and similar drugs work and because of the current impossibility of knowing from the ovulation test whether a new life is present," says the Bishops' letter.  "To administer Plan B pills without an ovulation test is not an intrinsically evil act."

Scientifically however the Bishops are on very weak ground.  The Catholic Medical Association, the largest professional organization of Catholic physicians in the U.S., is resolutely opposed to the use of the abortifacient morning after pill in Catholic Hospitals even in cases of rape because of its potential to cause abortions.  Medical evidence demonstrates that the pregnancy tests used cannot accurately detect a pregnancy at fertilization but only after implantation which takes more than a week after the new life is formed. 

At its Annual Meeting in 2003, the Catholic Medical Association passed a resolution correcting theologians who have erroneously suggested that it would be legitimate for Catholic hospitals to provide "emergency contraception" to rape victims. Echoing the Vatican, the resolution stated that that the morning after pill "cannot be ethically employed by a Catholic physician or administered in a Catholic Hospital in cases of rape".

The Connecticut bishops are not the only ones who have approved the use of the morning after pill in Catholic hospitals for rape victims.  LifeSiteNews.com has learned that some Catholic hospitals in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Colorado, New York, California and Washington also offer so-called 'emergency contraception' to some rape victims with the approval of local Catholic bishops.

The bishops are basing their decisions on an interpretation of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops document: Ethical and Religious Directives (E.R.D.) for Catholic Health Care Services which states at no. 36 with regard to a woman who has been raped: "If after appropriate testing,, there is no evidence that conception has occurred already, she may be treated with medications that would prevent ovulation, sperm capacitation the process by which spermatozoa in the ampullary portion of a uterine tube become capable of going through the acrosome reaction and fertilizing an oocyte." However, the document adds: "It is not permissible, however, to initiate or to recommend treatments that have as their purpose or direct effect the removal, destruction, or interference with the implantation of a fertilized ovum." (see the document: http://www.usccb.org/bishops/directives.shtml )

However, even if such tests could accurately determine that ovulation has not yet occurred another difficulty exists.  A study by Dr. Chris Kahlenborn in 2003 found that the pill only works to halt ovulation half the time.  Thus fertilization may occur even after the pill is administered, and an abortion would result since in addition to stopping ovulation the pills act to weaken the lining of the uterus making implantation unsustainable.  See Dr. Kahlenborn's study here: http://www.polycarp.org/postfertilization_polycarp_1.htm&nbs...;

Speaking with LifeSiteNews.com earlier this year, about the problem of bishops permitting the morning after pill in Catholic hospitals in cases of rape, Dr. Kahlenborn said bluntly, "The bishops who approve this are approving potential abortions."

See the full Connecticut Bishops' statement:
http://www.connecticut.nasccd.org/bins/connecticut/templates...

To express concerns to the Vatican:

Pontifical Academy for Life:
pav@acdlife.va

To email the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith:
Cardinal William Levada
E-mail: cdf@cfaith.va




TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; ct; planb; rape

1 posted on 09/29/2007 3:05:08 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

Pro-life ping!


2 posted on 09/29/2007 3:06:38 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

Pro-life ping!


3 posted on 09/29/2007 3:07:30 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
From Creative Minority Report:

The Catholic People of America, joined by all reasonable people in the State of Connecticut, have issued the following statement on the administration of plan D for the Catholic Bishops of Connecticut:

The Catholic People of America remain committed to the Episcopacy. However, we now must advocate the administration of Plan D. Plan D calls for the prevention of implantation of (D)umb Bishops into their dioceses. Further when it cannot be scientifically proven that the Bishops have any noticeable brain function or conscience, Plan D calls for the immediate abortion of their Episcopal duties.

Recent events have made it scientifically clear that the Catholic Bishops of Connecticut have absolutely no brain function or conscience. Since diocesan implantation has already occurred, we call for the immediate abortion of their episcopal duties.

To lessen the blow of this terrible measure, the Catholic People of America, have decided that since these bishops have shown themselves to be without brain function or conscience, that we are not sure if they are actually Bishops. Since we are unsure if they are actually bishops, we do not consider removal from their dioceses to be Episcopal abortions. If at a later date it can be shown that these Bishops have brain function or a conscience, we will gladly re-open this matter.

I hope someone sent this to the bishops!

4 posted on 09/29/2007 3:21:21 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Bishops are off the reservation on this call. There is no way to assess whether ovulation has taken place or whether an ovum has been fertilized. In short, the Bishops are taking a step they will deeply regret.

Perhaps it is time to get out of the Catholic Hospital industry? If the state is going to make regulations like this, the Church has no role in this “business.” The old hospitals which ministered to the poor and indigent using religious Orders of “nurse nuns” in full habits have long gone. My aunt was such a one...for 53 years.

F


5 posted on 09/29/2007 3:22:01 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

Ping!


6 posted on 09/29/2007 4:45:37 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

**Catholic Medical Assoc Opposed**

Glad to hear this!


7 posted on 09/29/2007 8:11:10 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed

“There is no way to assess whether ovulation has taken place or whether an ovum has been fertilized”

Not true. Women’s hormones change based upon their cycle. luteinising hormone (LH)can be used to predict ovulation very accurately. The presence of other hormones can be used to determine at what point the cycle is.

There is some evidence to contradict the evidence presented in this article, and there is some doubt that Plan B prevents implantation. It isn’t 100%, but it is substantial, and possibly these bishops were persuaded by this evidence. I can see having doubt enough to reject the use of PLan B, but to claim there is no way to assess whether ovulation has taken place is 100% untrue.


8 posted on 09/30/2007 4:11:55 PM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ga medic
It isn’t 100%, but it is substantial, and possibly these bishops were persuaded by this evidence.

Anything less than 100% certainty is an unacceptable risk that innocent life will be taken.

9 posted on 10/01/2007 8:10:10 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

There will never be 100% certainty that something won’t happen. You cannot prove a negative. I do think that there is more work that needs to be done, but there isn’t ever going 100% certainty that something can’t happen.

I am hopeful that there will be a point where Plan B can be used in cases of rape and within Catholic teaching. We aren’t there yet. Rape victims are important too, and the trauma of pregnancy in addition to the rape can be horrible for some. Prevention of pregnancy in such a case would be a wonderful thing.


10 posted on 10/01/2007 8:24:00 AM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I suppose that we could always adopt the Reformed posture that much of humanity is simply garbage to be burned in hellfire forever (actually a recent poster implied that God would make us like our final outcome) and we are simply doing His work for Him.


11 posted on 10/01/2007 10:49:45 AM PDT by MarkBsnr (V. Angelus Domini nuntiavit Mariae. R. Et concepit de Spiritu Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson