Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 08/20/2007 6:30:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Because.



Skip to comments.

Scriptural Basis for Catholic Doctrine (Series)
Original | 8/20/7 | pjr12345

Posted on 08/20/2007 2:11:09 PM PDT by pjr12345

Papal Authority / Apostolic Succession / Peter as First Pope

The basis for papal authority lies in the Roman Catholic Church's interpretation of Matthew 16:18-19 --

18 And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed[d] in heaven.

Catholics believe that Jesus was addressing Peter only in His statement, and interpret this verse as Jesus' intent to build an earthly institution of man with Peter as its foundational leader.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: badfaith; bashing; catholic; defense; doctrine; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
ALL:

This series is intended to demonstrate Biblical support (or lack thereof) for certain doctrines common within the Catholic faith. Appeals to Tradition, Magisterium, Creeds, Commentaries, or any material other than Scripture are unacceptable.

By Scripture I mean the 69 non-apocryphal books. Please don't clutter up the thread with a debate about the origination of Scripture, its content, caretakers, or source. If you have any doubts about what Scripture is, then use the New King James Version and save your comments for another thread.

Please keep the discussion civil, centered on the topic, and above all Scriptural.

I'm looking forward to your insights.

pjr12345

1 posted on 08/20/2007 2:11:11 PM PDT by pjr12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

I invite all Catholic readers of this thread to keep in mind Matthew 7:6.


2 posted on 08/20/2007 2:12:35 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Whoops! I forgot the font setting. Trying again.

I invite all Catholic readers of this thread to keep in mind Matthew 7:6.

3 posted on 08/20/2007 2:14:04 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Good advice.


4 posted on 08/20/2007 2:15:18 PM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: al_c

Get a load of the proposed restrictions. LOL


5 posted on 08/20/2007 2:16:05 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

FReepmail to you.


6 posted on 08/20/2007 2:17:28 PM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
By Scripture I mean the 69 non-apocryphal books.

Nonsense!

The Bible has 72 Books.

Appeals to Tradition, Magisterium, Creeds, Commentaries, or any material other than Scripture are unacceptable.

Further nonsense!

The Councils, Creeds, writings of the Fathers, etc. are a written record of how the Church has understood the 72 Books of Sacred Scripture for going on 2000 years.

Please keep the discussion civil, centered on the topic,

That would be a nice rule for all threads on this forum.

7 posted on 08/20/2007 2:18:33 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Get a load of the proposed restrictions. LOL


8 posted on 08/20/2007 2:19:06 PM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I believe it is safe to suggest that Anglicans and Orthodox would consider the Bishop of Rome as the “First Among Equals” of all bishops however Anglicans and Orthodox continue to dispute the nature of that title. They hold that the Bishop of Rome should exercise authority in a more collegial manner (in the ancient tradition) rather than in a singular authoritative manner.


9 posted on 08/20/2007 2:19:42 PM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: al_c

Precisely.


10 posted on 08/20/2007 2:20:27 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; al_c

Logic dictates that the various “equal” authorities claimed within the RCC (Scripture, Tradition, Magisterium) ought to be independently sufficient in defending any RCC doctrine.

After all, if there is no error or contradiction in any of these authorities, then any one of them must provide an adequate defense of any doctrine.


11 posted on 08/20/2007 2:22:45 PM PDT by pjr12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

If you don’t like the rules, then leave the thread and create your own.


12 posted on 08/20/2007 2:24:01 PM PDT by pjr12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
...leave the thread...

Best. Advice. Ever.

13 posted on 08/20/2007 2:28:09 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: al_c; Petronski

Your infantile attacks merely demonstrate your fear of legitimate debate. Is your faith indefensible when Scripture is the Standard? Or is it your own inadequacies that frighten you?


14 posted on 08/20/2007 2:30:12 PM PDT by pjr12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
Appeals to Tradition, Magisterium, Creeds, Commentaries, or any material other than Scripture are unacceptable...If you have any doubts about what Scripture is, then use the New King James Version and save your comments for another thread.

LOL...just curious...do the translators of the King James count as "material other than Scripture"?

The logical conclusion of your parameters here means we'd forgo the English translation altogether for the Hebrew and Greek, no?

15 posted on 08/20/2007 2:32:46 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
Unless you get this thread declared some sort of Protestant Caucus, or the Moderator tells me to shove off, I will exercise my right to properly identify the Emperor's New Clothes.

You have set up nonsense conditions, particularly in your definition of "Scripture", and those conditions will only produce nonsense discussion.

16 posted on 08/20/2007 2:33:09 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
Wow. Personal attacks.

Wonderful.

17 posted on 08/20/2007 2:34:21 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
Your rules preclude any legitimate discussion, and I recall from past performance that attempting “debate” with you is a pointless and futile act.

Taunting me with the equivalent of a schoolyard “what are you, chicken?” is not going to make a difference.

I’m just here to post some good advice for fellow Catholics, which they are free to follow or reject.

That advice to my fellow Catholics: remember and consider carefully the admonitions in Matthew 7:6.

18 posted on 08/20/2007 2:35:35 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pjr12345
69 non-apocryphal books

The last time I counted, there were only 66 books in this category. Am I missing something?

19 posted on 08/20/2007 2:38:11 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

Typo. My apologies


20 posted on 08/20/2007 2:39:13 PM PDT by pjr12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson