Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope: Other Christians not true churches
AP ^ | July 11, 2007 | NICOLE WINFIELD

Posted on 07/10/2007 8:57:47 AM PDT by f150sound

LORENZAGO DI CADORE, Italy - Pope Benedict XVI has reasserted the universal primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches.

In the latest document — formulated as five questions and answers — the Vatican seeks to set the record straight on Vatican II's ecumenical intent, saying some contemporary theological interpretation had been "erroneous or ambiguous" and had prompted confusion and doubt.

It restates key sections of a 2000 document the pope wrote when he was prefect of the congregation, "Dominus Iesus," which set off a firestorm of criticism among Protestant and other Christian denominations because it said they were not true churches but merely ecclesial communities and therefore did not have the "means of salvation."

"Christ 'established here on earth' only one church," the document said. The other communities "cannot be called 'churches' in the proper sense" because they do not have apostolic succession — the ability to trace their bishops back to Christ's original apostles.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholics; exclusivefranchise; orthodox; quidestveritas; religion; truthisabsolute; vatican; viniusinvictus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 621-623 next last
To: muawiyah

Apparently, it is not. Every now and then I am right about something.


101 posted on 07/10/2007 9:41:06 AM PDT by grellis (Femininists for Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

I belong to a church as defined by the Bible.
Saving grace comes from God, not a sacrament (works).
Jesus paid it all. In Him I put my faith.


102 posted on 07/10/2007 9:42:29 AM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Thought you may enjoy this thread.

It's a little frustrating to see the dearth of critical thinking on threads like these.

Very little sign of intelligent disagreement here.

Almost everyone is wilfully ignoring what was actually said.

103 posted on 07/10/2007 9:42:31 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

Catholics shouldn’t date Protestants, actually.


104 posted on 07/10/2007 9:44:26 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
Salvation is by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ.

Correct. And God bestows His grace to those who are faithful to His Son by means of the sacraments - including the Mass.

A Catholics Mass (works) has no power of salvation.

The Mass is the Sacrifice on Calvary.

It is the work of Jesus Christ, not of men, and Christ's work is indeed the power of salvation to those who believe.

105 posted on 07/10/2007 9:45:31 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Inge C

As will our cannibalism. Don’t forget that little detail about us Catholics.


106 posted on 07/10/2007 9:46:06 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; Fairview
There is a passage in the Catechism of the Catholic Church that does state that other non-Catholic Christians can be received into heaven; if prodded I could produce the citation. How is that to be reconciled with today’s statement? Is the Pope changing the Catechism?

Just to second wideawake's response, there is a Catholic dogma (and thus infallible) that states: "Outside the Church there is no salvation."

But this dogma has never been taken to mean that only people *listed on the parish rolls* will go to heaven. There is a canonized saint, St. Emerentiana, who was never actually baptized...she died a catechumen and was never received into the Church formally. Yet we know beyond all doubt that she is in heaven.

Anyway, with a very few exceptions (JW's, Mormons, etc), Protestant baptisms are recognized as valid by the Catholic Church. That means that every Protestant is *actually* a baptized member of the (Catholic) Church, whether he or she knows it, admits it, or not.

Now that doesn't mean Protestants automatically go to heaven--we don't believe in once saved always saved. And we have to admit that it is much much *harder* for Protestants to get to heaven because those denominations lack the sacraments that Christ instituted to help us get to heaven (no Confession, no Communion).

So a personal in a denomination (or even a perfect pagan) CAN be saved...but IF they are, that only happens because somehow, someway, unknown perhaps to anyone on this earth, they were invisibly united to the visible Catholic Church.

I hope that makes sense...it's a confusing issue even to Catholics.

107 posted on 07/10/2007 9:47:30 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
I belong to a church as defined by the Bible.

So why do you care if the Catholic Church defines "church" differently? Do you think the Catholic Church has some power to affect your life and salvation?

108 posted on 07/10/2007 9:50:13 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: pctech; NYer; Frank Sheed; BlackElk
Here in the “americanized” version of the RCC the worship of the Pope isn’t stressed. But if you go overseas it taught as a founding doctrine of the RCC and those nations live by it. Check your facts.

I'd love to watch you try to prove that.

109 posted on 07/10/2007 9:51:03 AM PDT by Petronski (Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
Saving grace comes from God, not a sacrament (works).

Yes to the first part. But a sacrament is not a work of men. It is a work of Christ *through* men. Big difference.

110 posted on 07/10/2007 9:51:58 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Remembering the day the cute little Jewish babe in my government class (in college) asked if I knew any Catholics. She said she'd never met any (having gone only to private boarding schools ~ her father was a career diplomat)

She thought she should learn something about them considering she was at a university with something like a 25% Catholic student body.

So, foolishly as it turned out, I took her to visit with a friend or two at a student gathering place. My good buddy (a Catholic with a brother who was a priest no less) had his sister there, and only then did I discover she thought it was OK for her to date Protestants, and why did I bring that girl along, and lord was she mad ~ like a wet hen, but she held it in good and you could only see a bit of steam ~ woman turned beet red I tell you.

End of story.

The lesson was learned ~ don't introduce cute babes to anybody.

111 posted on 07/10/2007 9:53:19 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
As will our cannibalism. Don’t forget that little detail about us Catholics.

*************

Heh. Thanks for the reminder. :)

112 posted on 07/10/2007 9:54:23 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Do you really think you belong to a "church" as defined by the Catholic Church? You have priests with direct succession from the Apostles and your Church dispenses saving grace through the sacraments?

I wouldn't say the priests busted for molesting young boys are on a line of succession from the apostles...

113 posted on 07/10/2007 9:57:14 AM PDT by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Claud
If you stop participating in the sacraments, do you put your soul at risk?
114 posted on 07/10/2007 9:57:16 AM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

Do you or did you ever use the term “father” in regards to your biological father, or did you in fact call him by his first name? If you did use the term, then it seems you’re steeped in sin. Shame on you.


115 posted on 07/10/2007 9:57:57 AM PDT by theanonymouslurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
God bestows His grace to those who are faithful to His Son...There need not be more then just that.

It is man in his arrogance who has decreed the need to define what church group or people who are those to provide the sacraments. Man is simply here to teach the word of the Lord, to be living examples of our Lord’s teaching’s. The Bible tells me so long as I hear the word, accept the word I can be saved. I am sure Jesus is happy we practice and show his faith through various sacrament, praise his name, but to believe one who can not partake in sacrament, or partakes in groups which the RCC judges does not provide proper sacrament, or prays in silence for fear of death or injury is one who can not be saved is against what Jesus taught us. It is sad to think that man believes they are the one to judge how one attains eternal life based on what "church" provides us the "Jesus seal of approval sacrament" when Jesus has already told us.

116 posted on 07/10/2007 10:01:26 AM PDT by never4get
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Claud
But a sacrament is not a work of men. It is a work of Christ *through* men. Big difference.

Good luck getting Protestants to understand a concept like the Incarnation. They might believe God took on matter in the person of Christ, but they don't seem to grasp the implications.

117 posted on 07/10/2007 10:01:41 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: pctech

What the ‘custom’ of other countries is, is not the same as the doctrine of the Church.


118 posted on 07/10/2007 10:01:47 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

LOL! No, just stating the obvious.


119 posted on 07/10/2007 10:02:25 AM PDT by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree
This all may be true. The guy that you used to date may have worshiped the Pope, but as far as the Dogma is concerned...see post 25.
120 posted on 07/10/2007 10:03:27 AM PDT by skimbell (Conservatism Works)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 621-623 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson