How about Pope Paul VI and one out of four archeologists that I posted to you earlier. Don't you remember:
"Guarducci presented her theory to Paul VI in 1964. After additional tests, the pope was convinced, despite dissent from three of the original four archaeologists. Paul announced that the bones of Peter had been identified 'in a manner which we believe convincing.' On June 27, 1968, Paul reinterred them, stored in 19 Plexiglas cases, in Peter’s tomb."
[http://www.catholicdigest.org/stories/200105052a.html]
Is two enough for a "they" or should I add Walsh and all the church clergy who have been making the claim to the gullible for years as if it came from an infallible Pope's mouth.
You wrote;
“How about Pope Paul VI and one out of four archeologists that I posted to you earlier. Don’t you remember:”
I do remember and that still doesn’t work. Paul made no infallible statement about Peter’s relics. None.
“Is two enough for a “they” or should I add Walsh and all the church clergy who have been making the claim to the gullible for years as if it came from an infallible Pope’s mouth.”
That still doesn’t work. You wrote: “So then which bones are they now claiming to be Peter’s: the skull bones at St John Lateran or those skeletal bones under St Peter’s Basilica???”
Who is they? Did Paul VI EVER make an official statement about Peter’s bones that all Catholics are supposed to believe? No.
And who made the claim that the skull at St. John Lateran was St. Peter’s? Who EXACTLY?