Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

You wrote;

“How about Pope Paul VI and one out of four archeologists that I posted to you earlier. Don’t you remember:”

I do remember and that still doesn’t work. Paul made no infallible statement about Peter’s relics. None.

“Is two enough for a “they” or should I add Walsh and all the church clergy who have been making the claim to the gullible for years as if it came from an infallible Pope’s mouth.”

That still doesn’t work. You wrote: “So then which bones are they now claiming to be Peter’s: the skull bones at St John Lateran or those skeletal bones under St Peter’s Basilica???”

Who is they? Did Paul VI EVER make an official statement about Peter’s bones that all Catholics are supposed to believe? No.

And who made the claim that the skull at St. John Lateran was St. Peter’s? Who EXACTLY?


217 posted on 06/10/2007 2:01:48 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
Did Paul VI EVER make an official statement about Peter’s bones that all Catholics are supposed to believe?

But vladimir, vladimir, vladimir --- you made an official announcement right here on this forum that you saw Peter's bones in the Vatican. Did you say that with the intention that you would be believed or were you just flapping your wings like you have been doing for some time now???

Did you believe Paul VI's announcement about the bones was accurate??? Apparently you did. So are you now saying that Paul VI's announcement about the bones was wrong????

225 posted on 06/10/2007 3:48:02 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson