You wrote:
“Several posts back you were trying to pawn off on us Walsh’s book about the bones -— Now you are backpedalling as fast as a Vatican retreat. LOLOL!!!!!”
I told you to read Walsh’s book. How is Walsh a “they”? Who is “they”? Why are you evading that simple question?
How about Pope Paul VI and one out of four archeologists that I posted to you earlier. Don't you remember:
"Guarducci presented her theory to Paul VI in 1964. After additional tests, the pope was convinced, despite dissent from three of the original four archaeologists. Paul announced that the bones of Peter had been identified 'in a manner which we believe convincing.' On June 27, 1968, Paul reinterred them, stored in 19 Plexiglas cases, in Peter’s tomb."
[http://www.catholicdigest.org/stories/200105052a.html]
Is two enough for a "they" or should I add Walsh and all the church clergy who have been making the claim to the gullible for years as if it came from an infallible Pope's mouth.