Posted on 06/05/2007 10:53:58 AM PDT by Frank Sheed
Beautiful! How could lifting you mind to God ever “not be approved?” God told us to pray without ceasing.
I love this discussion going on about “such and such” is not a proper prayer for God!
God IS.. HE IS BEING...His Will keeps us in existence! HE LIVES IN THE ETERNAL PRESENT! There is no past or future for Him! God is outside of time; it is a meaningless concept for an Eternal Being!!!! That is why Jesus said that Abraham, Isaac and Moses are all present to God—that He is a God of the living! He told Moses from the burning bush, “I AM WHO AM! Tell them I AM sent you!”
So how can something in the Eternal Present be hearing repetition? Let God BE God!
I also know and knew lots of Baptists, Methodists and kids from every faith who never felt the need to read the Bible. It doesn't mean it wasn't there and present through their church services and the lives of the faithful if they cared to listen. I know a lot of Catholics who say what you say, but they obviously didn't feel called to do the hard work it took to find about what their faith really taught. I believe that if my Catholic friends had been more informed about their faith that I would have become Catholic sooner but I can't whine about that, I believe I became a Catholic in God's own time. Completely oblivious of what I was doing, I believe that God used me to put lapsed Catholic friends back into the church and to ask questions so that they could answer my questions. And some of those same friends ended up Catechizing me when I joined the Church, I just find it amazing!
Anyway it wasn't the fault of the Church that those Catholics didn't know the faith it was the fault of that Catholic who didn't ask the questions.
I have seen 2 citations in the last day of the scripture about mother's milk and eating meat but do they even consider that there comes a time when we have to find our own meal or die, that along with no longer needing mother's milk that we grow and provide our own food? That the mother who sustained us expects us to do something for ourselves.
I've read your posts and you seem to want me and others to listen to your interpretation of the Bible and believe the faith that you are in now. Then you say that you were a Catholic and didn't hold a Bible until you were 30. If not why not? If someone informed you wrongly why didn't you ask questions until you found the truth? Why do you believe that you didn't read the Bible, even if it wasn't in a compiled Bible. I remember scripture from church services before I knew how to read. Why didn't you ponder the Word every week or read it in the missal?
When I became Catholic I didn't ask why God made me a Methodist and wasted my time because I had already asked what the Methodist church believed and while not rejecting most of what it believed, I longed for more. More truth, more meat. Yes, I came to regret what so many Methodist churches had become but not most of their tenets of faith. I didn't curse the faith of my youth, I embrace it gladly to this day, I am just glad He gave me a map and set me on the journey to wholeness.
I would challenge you to take an RCIA course. There are some on the internet, one that I found very simple and informative is the free one from Fr. Lukefahr. They send you a book and then you can answer questions on the net and then they tell you if you understand. I'm not saying this to change your belief but so you can understand what the church teaches and not live with the misconceptions and anger for believing that the church failed you. I see the those misconceptions in your posts and wonder that you could believe some of the things about Catholicism that you seem to believe.
Now, I'm going to shock you. I don't think that I NEED the Bible, personally to be saved. I believe that it contains all the information I need to be saved, I believe that it is the inspired Word of God, I believe that it is infallible, I believe that it is an incredible gift, I believe I can draw unbelievable wisdom from it, I believe I can draw closer to God by reading it but I also believe that God could save me if I had never heard of the Bible, if I couldn't see, or hear or think or if it had never been. If I believed that one had to have the Bible to be saved, I would have to believe that Peter and Paul aren't in heaven because they never saw the Bible and Paul didn't see Christ when he walked this earth. I would have to believe that all those early Christians are lost in some limbo and they will never see the face of God (because surely they wouldn't be in hell) because they didn't read a Bible. If it wasn't written it would still be true. If I couldn't avail myself of the Bible, it would still be true, God alone saves, the Bible is a gift to his people in written form. It is an aid to our salvation and it teaches us, but it does not save, God does.
Jacob I loved and Esau I hated, sounds pretty partial..
I'm late to this thread so this'll be redundant, I'm sure...
You just posted why we don't pray to Mary...We know Mary DOES NOT reign with Jesus...Mary's role was fulfilled while alive on earth...
Mary reigning in heaven is not biblical...So we just don't believe you...
I wonder where Mary’s throne is, in Heaven. I wonder how many times we can find reference to it by either the Lord of His Father
Do you not know that God’s hatred is not emotional, but comparative? God’s love for Esau is such that it appears as hatred when compared to His love for Jacob. All through the Bible this comparison is used. God “hates” the wicked; Jesus told us that we are to “hate” our families. What do you think these statements mean?
None of deserve to be saved. Being saved is a gift, not a right. Free will always leads us to sin, because sinning is in our natures. If you are one of His, you can learn the lesson the easy way or you can learn the lesson the hard way. I’m a lowly sinner & am in no position to question how He uses His power, who He elects & who He doesn’t elect.
YOPIOS!
lets assume you are right and Gods love is comparative which I can not argue has backing in scripture. He is still favoring based on no perceivable merits one over the other other than its his preference.
I just had my teeth cleaned!
Way before I became Catholic, I went through a period when I could never finish the Lord’s prayer. Something happened to interrupt me or I fell asleep. I’ve always thought that there was an underlaying battle there.
So, God saying that He is no respecter of persons is of no importance? Is He a liar?
There is no dodging this issue. If God chooses one sinner over another, He is in fact a respecter of persons, and a liar to boot. He is arbitrary and not Supreme, and therefore unworthy of worship.
True, but I think that's a lot better than the one that usually pops into my mind first.
Good food, good meat, good God let's eat. (told y'all I'm way less than eloquent)
Congratulations Mr. Sheed! You win the prize for being the first to grope for the YOPIOS defense.
Sadly, it just means that the argument is over and you lose.
Our lives should be a prayer to God. Everything we do, say and think should be done as an offering to His glory. How much more careful would we be if we knew we were laying our daily lives on His altar?
No, the subject is that you believe that only the Bible defines the Church! I believe, as do all Catholics, in Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Magisterial Teachings of the Church. YOU believe in only the Bible. Therefore, you have cut off two legs of the structure of the Church as Christ gave it to us!
That, then, makes my point very relevant. The Early Church relied on both written AND on oral tradition. I can prove it with Scripture as can Dave Armstrong or any apologist on this Board. So, why do you damn or strike down something from Tradition when you don’t believe it in the first place?
Plus, the book you base your soul on for all of your Faith cannot define itself! It was not meant to stand alone. It didn’t in Judaism either.
That is my point. YOPIOS.
“Holy Mary” -— Can smoeone please explain to me, a cradle catholis, why the term “Holy Mary” is considered to be inappropriate for the the Mother of Lour Lord and Redeemer?
This is a serious question as it puzzles me. If one is a Christian, and one understands that God, the Father, selected Mary to become the mother of the Messiah, the Annointed one, then why would anyone think that God who is all Holy and Almighty, would allow his only-begotten
Son to become man in the womb of an unholy woman?
I really do not understand why there should be any question about the holiness of Mary. She was created and selected by God to fulfill this most important female role in the history of mankind.
Holy implies without Sin there is no one who is Holy save God.
No backing in Scripture? What did Jesus mean when He instructed us to love Him but hate our families? There's plenty of backing, and I recommend a study of God's love and hate.
He is still favoring based on no perceivable merits one over the other other than its his preference.
If the love/hate of God is comparative, then there is no vindictive action associated with His hate. Yes, he selected Jacob over Esau to continue the birthright originated in Abraham. Does that mean that Esau is "lost"? God most certainly makes choices, but within the bounds of His unchanging Word, and with perfect justice.
God also shows preferential treatment to His own. He will give eternal life to all those in Christ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.