Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Claims of Jesus’ Judaism ‘indefensible’
Total Catholic ^ | March 13, 2007

Posted on 03/13/2007 12:40:46 PM PDT by Alex Murphy

The Pontifical Household Preacher Fr Raniero Cantalamessa has said the theory suggesting that Jesus was a typical Jew of the time is "historically indefensible."

In a reading during Sunday’s liturgy Fr Cantalamessa said Jesus’ words regarding John the Baptist (Luke 7:28 and Luke 16:16) tell of a “qualitative leap” between Judaism and Christianity.

“Here we see how historically indefensible is the thesis of those who want to enclose Jesus in the world of the Judaism of his time, making him a Jew just like the others, one who did not intend to make a break with the past or to bring anything substantially new.

“This would be to set back the historical research on Jesus to a stage that we left behind quite some time ago,” Fr Cantalamessa.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Judaism; Theology
KEYWORDS: judaism; sadducees
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2007 12:40:47 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Well, duh! He was the only Jew who was God born in the flesh.


2 posted on 03/13/2007 12:46:27 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Roses are red
Violets are bluish
If it wasn't for Jesus
We'd all be Jewish.


3 posted on 03/13/2007 12:49:15 PM PDT by Mugwump (Better Living Through Sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mugwump

That *is* a joke, BTW...


4 posted on 03/13/2007 12:50:13 PM PDT by Mugwump (Better Living Through Sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

If he wasn't a jew he would not have left the temple at Jeruselem alive. It was death for a non-jew to enter.


5 posted on 03/13/2007 12:51:57 PM PDT by LibKill (RudycRAT is lying his way to power. Look at his record. He's 100% DemocRAT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

When He rose from the dead, he staightened it all out and made salvation available to everyone.


6 posted on 03/13/2007 12:52:12 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Here we see how historically indefensible is the thesis of those who want to enclose Jesus in the world of the Judaism of his time, making him a Jew just like the others, one who did not intend to make a break with the past or to bring anything substantially new

I think he is missing something very big here. Jesus wasn't a Jew 'like the others' if one says the others were limited to the Herodian installed Pharisaical priesthood. He was, however, in the mold of the Maccabee priests one finds in the Apocrypha & the Essene teachers (of whom it is argued, John the Baptist was one.)

Jesus was a Jew, but he wasn't a part of the political structure of Herodian Jews. He was bringing back the classical sense of bridging the gap of the people & God.

I guess, what I am saying is it wasn't Jesus who went against Jewish tradition, it was the Herodian Pharisaical sects who were in charge.

It is also of an interesting historical context to note that shortly after Jesus, the Jewish religion went through a similar upheaval when the Temple was destroyed and the Rabbinical form of Judaism came to fruition- again, based on a relationship w/ God versus going through the temple.

7 posted on 03/13/2007 12:53:39 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

If Mary was a Jew, so was her son!


8 posted on 03/13/2007 12:54:27 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I guess, what I am saying is it wasn't Jesus who went against Jewish tradition, it was the Herodian Pharisaical sects who were in charge.

Correct! When Yeshua railed against the so called rulers of the Jews He was aiming at the Hellenized rulers, after all, Nicodemus is a Greek name. Read the Prodigal son (Luke 15) with this in mind, the older brother is Judaism, the younger Christianity. Ouch!

9 posted on 03/13/2007 1:06:25 PM PDT by Jeremiah Jr (Saturn is in Leo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeremiah Jr
I've never read the prodigal son pesher like that.. very enlightening. I'm just glad my rambling made sense to someone..
10 posted on 03/13/2007 1:09:22 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

So if he wasn't a Jew, what was he? A Hindu? This is just plain silly.


11 posted on 03/13/2007 1:09:25 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Seeing a chance to stir the theological pot for purely debate purposes...

If Mary was a Jew, so was her son!

And what religion is God?

12 posted on 03/13/2007 1:23:42 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
According to "Ask the Reform Rabbi":
In traditional Jewish law, Jewish identity is inherited through the mother only.

[snip]

Further, once a person is Jewish - either by having a Jewish mother or by converting to Judaism - he or she is considered Jewish for life. Though such people may sin by rejecting Judaism, they cannot "convert out."

[snip]

Things are a bit different in Reform Judaism. The Reform Movement tends to give more weight to individual choices in matters of identity - including the choice to convert to a different religion.

Also, the Reform Movement does not follow the tradition of recognizing inheritance of Jewish identity solely through the mother. The position of most Reform rabbis is to accept the Jewish identity of a person with only one Jewish parent (a mother or father) only if he or she was raised as a Jew with appropriate public rituals of Jewish identity (a Jewish baby naming, for example).
So, according to traditional Jewish law, Jesus was a Jew since His mother was Jew, even though His Father was not (He is God).

Did Jesus "sin by rejecting Judaism"? I'd say not since Christianity would be the extension of the Jewish faith, defined as those who believe that the Jewish Messiah has come in the person of Jesus Christ. Jesus rejected the Jewish interpretation of the law, but He did not reject the true Jewish law, He fulfilled it.

According to the Reform Movement, then Jesus would definitely have been a Jew.
13 posted on 03/13/2007 1:31:16 PM PDT by Sopater (All of the evidence supports the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

In Judaism, it is the maternal parent that determines the indisputable jewishness of the child.


14 posted on 03/13/2007 1:33:07 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Really? Every day I learn something new, especially here on FR!. Thanks silverleaf!


15 posted on 03/13/2007 1:37:20 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TBP
So if he wasn't a Jew, what was he? A Hindu? This is just plain silly.

What part of "just like the others" and "make a break with the past or to bring anything substantially new" is so hard to read and understand?

This is just plain silly.

16 posted on 03/13/2007 1:39:30 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
So, according to traditional Jewish law, Jesus was a Jew since His mother was Jew, even though His Father was not

Isn't there also something in Leviticus about being adopted into a Jewish household? One could say that Joseph 'adopted' Jesus into his household, thus a double whammy.

17 posted on 03/13/2007 1:53:15 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TBP

"So if he wasn't a Jew, what was he? A Hindu? This is just plain silly."


Both Our Lord and His Mother are Catholic!


18 posted on 03/13/2007 2:06:42 PM PDT by Macoraba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
"...the Herodian installed Pharisaical priesthood."

You're thinking of the Sadducee's who ran the Temple along Herodian guidelines. The Pharisees descended from the Hasidim, and bore the piousness of the Jewish masses as well as facilitating the ordination of rabbis, of whom Jesus was one. Moreover, phariseeism is most commonly traced to the origins of modern Judaism.

Hyam Maccoby, Revolution In Judaea: Jesus and the Jewish Resistance.

19 posted on 03/13/2007 2:16:11 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Good catch.. you are right, thanks for correcting my 'brief mental breakdown'...


20 posted on 03/13/2007 2:28:03 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson