read later
Ditto
NOTE TO ALL:
While my keyboard problem appears to be solved for the time being . . . I still have little to no inclination to defend or support the validity of the AUTHENTIC Bible Codes.
There is a link above . . . let me see . . .
http://www.biblecodedigest.com/page.php/501
RE:
A SUBSTANTIVE BASIS FOR TESTING THE CLAIMED REALITY OF BIBLE CODES
IF
someone were to cite a specific paragraph of that doc or a similar one, I MIGHT be willing to respond about the substance of the paragraph.
Most carping naysayers tend to avoid even seriously scanning, much less reading; much, much less understanding and discussing the merits of the statistical science and linguistic arts involved in authentic codes.
However, Drosnin's spurious stuff and a host of other spurious stuff aside, there is a considerable body of extremely solid peer-reviewed statistical documentation of the awesume validity of the Codes--that is, that what has been found
IN SCRIPTURE TRUMPS THAT FOUND IN ANY OTHER LONG HEBREW TEXT
BY A VERY, VERY, VERY, VERY WIDE MARGIN.
That's simply a fact. Naysayers to that fact will eventually paint themselves more overtly with the foolishness their absurd statements tend to be saturated with.
Bias is not a substitute for truth nor for scientific inquiry.
I'll likely ignore most naysayers on the thread unless I happen to feel particularly fiesty on occasion.
Blessings,
Cheers.