Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All
March 23, 2007

’Jesus’ Barabbas

In some of the early manuscripts of Matthew’s Gospel the name of this criminal is Jesus Barabbas. Most other manuscripts do not have this, which is why, some editors of the New Testament omit it and others put it in brackets.

It is hard to say whether this name was added by a copyist to the early manuscripts, or whether it was originally there and subsequently deleted by a copyist. Scripture scholars are divided on this, but some note that, because giving the name “Jesus” to a notorious sinner seems blasphemous, it would be more likely that a copyist deleted it rather than a copyist added it.

* * * * * *

All four gospels agree that at the time of Jesus’ trial the Romans had in custody a prisoner named Barabbas. Luke says he was imprisoned for rioting and murder.

Barabbas makes a brief appearance during the trial of Jesus, and other than that nothing is known about him.

One gets the impression from the Gospel accounts that he was popular. Perhaps people identified with him as someone who stood against the Romans who occupied their land.

Barabbas serves to illustrate the truth of what is taking place. Jesus is innocent. Barabbas is guilty. What is taking place is the clear choice of evil over good.


78 posted on 03/27/2007 8:33:47 PM PDT by Salvation (" With God all things are possible. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: All
Friday – Fourth Week of Lent

Now on the occasion of the feast the governor was accustomed to release to the crowd one prisoner whom they wished. And at that time they had a notorious prisoner called [Jesus] Barabbas. So when they had assembled, Pilate said to them, “Which one do you want me to release to you, [Jesus} Barabbas or Jesus called Messiah?” For he knew that it was out of envy that they had handed him over. (Mt. 27:15-18)

The name “Barabbas” is an Aramaic word that literally means “son of the father.” Pilate will face him off against Jesus and unwittingly set up the question: Which one is the true “son of the father?”

Jesus responds, “You say so.” His answer is affirmative, but he does not take responsibility for everything Pilate has in mind. For Jesus, “king” has religious connotations – “Messiah.” For Pilate it is political.

Which one do you want? Jesus Barabbas, who is famous here in the big city? Or Jesus the Christ, who is from somewhere up north? The people will choose Barabbas.

This raises a question. I am a Christian, a disciple of the Lord. How seriously have I chosen Jesus? Is it more or less implicit, sort of an understanding, a not-so-thoroughly examined assumption that I was born into? Or is it an explicit, determined, resolute decision that anchors my day-to-day life?

Lent is meant to be decisions time – to make one, if I haven’t, and renew one if I have.

How clear is my choice to follow the Lord? How clear is it to me? How clear is it to Him?

Spend some quiet time with the Lord.

Go to fullsize image

79 posted on 03/27/2007 8:38:00 PM PDT by Salvation (" With God all things are possible. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson