Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; xzins
He's far, far harder on the RCs than I would ever dare to put into print.

My husband, too. He says it's because he knows of what he speaks. 8~)

I would bet that he doesn't. The fact of the matter is that it is perfectly human and natural for someone to belittle or even treat harshly an organization in which a person had left on bad terms. Is this not the case of an employee who is fired for stealing? Or if the employee feels that the employer treats him poorly? Is it any different here? To justify one's choice (religious or secular) on such issues, it is not unusual for that person to speak very poorly of their former religious or secular affiliation so as to justify their own decision.

My experience on this and other threads tells me that very few Catholics who leave Catholicism actually knew the teachings of the Church. This is evident in the need for Catholics here to correct misinterpretations of teachings given by "former Catholics" who supposedly "know" Catholicism.

Regards

36 posted on 02/08/2007 12:09:43 PM PST by jo kus (Humility is present when one debases oneself without being obliged to do so- St.Chrysostom; Phil 2:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: jo kus; Dr. Eckleburg

***Is this not the case of an employee who is fired for stealing?***

Nothing like poisoning the well now is there.....


37 posted on 02/08/2007 12:12:17 PM PST by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: jo kus
The fact of the matter is that it is perfectly human and natural for someone to belittle or even treat harshly an organization in which a person had left on bad terms.

My husband did not leave the RCC "on bad terms."

He fled the RCC, by the grace of God alone.

very few Catholics who leave Catholicism actually knew the teachings of the Church

lol. I can understand why you would want that to be so. But evidence is to the contrary. In my husband's case, 14 years of catholic education was profoundly instructive.

He knows of what you speak.

43 posted on 02/08/2007 12:28:19 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: jo kus

I would bet that he doesn't

= = =

Am a little unclear . . . is the bet that the wife is lying about hubby . . . or that hubby spent X or XX decades in the Roman Church and came away with total amnesia and is therefore lying himself?


92 posted on 02/08/2007 7:33:15 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: jo kus

That assessment, of course, without having dialogued with hubby; assessed anything directly or even via the wife about hubby . . .

just judging on the basis of wholesale bias, I guess, that hubby must be lying.

Impressive.


93 posted on 02/08/2007 7:34:33 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: jo kus; Dr. Eckleburg

Sorry, Dr E--forgot to ping you.

That assessment, of course, without having dialogued with hubby; assessed anything directly or even via the wife about hubby . . .

just judging on the basis of wholesale bias, I guess, that hubby must be lying.

Impressive.


94 posted on 02/08/2007 7:35:11 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson