Posted on 01/29/2007 4:10:13 PM PST by wagglebee
LONDON, January 29, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) British Catholics heard a flurry of naked anti-Catholic sentiments expressed last week by some government Members and Cabinet Ministers in the row over the governments decision to force Churches to adopt children to homosexuals.
Anti-Catholic, anti-clerical and anti-papal slurs had been, until as recently as fifty years ago, standard fare in Britains political discourse where the established state Protestant religion is officially anti-Catholic, but most British people, both Catholics and Anglicans, were grateful to assign them to historys waste bin.
Im not going to have some bloody reactionary German Pope dictate the law of our land, said one minister quoted by Mary Ann Sieghart.
Sieghart writes in an Op-Ed in the Times, that another admitted, only half-jokingly, that his mother had always told him, Never trust a Catholic. A third asked, Wheres all the child abuse and paedophilia? In the Catholic Church. They should get their own bloody house in order and sort out the way paedophilia lies hidden.
The anti-Catholic sentiment of Labours hard-left elite, however, is not shared by everyone on the government side of the House. Of the 40 Catholic MPs of Blairs Labour party, a majority wanted the exemption.
The Telegraph quotes Peter Kilfoyle, MP for Liverpool Walton, a working class region, This is just one more reason not to vote for us. Kilfoyles seat is considered one of the Labour Party's safest since 1964, with Labour polling over 70% of the vote in every general election since 1992.
Kilfoyle said his constituents and many like-minded Britons would not take kindly at voting time to a Labour Party that appears to be bullying churches. Describing his constituents as not the most enlightened people Kilfoyle said, They would be viewed by the London liberal tendency that is pushing this agenda as reactionary.
But they are decent people, with decent values, and they do not understand why the Government is doing this. They will react with disgust if any of the agencies do close. We will pay a heavy price and lose votes all over the country.
Joe Benton, the MP for neighbouring Bootle, said, I have strong reservations over this. Nothing has persuaded me that it is right. There should be an exemption for the Church. We are getting ourselves into a terrible mess.
British public opinion is almost exactly divided, with polls showing 42 per cent favouring an exemption and 43 per cent against. The Guardian reports today that the most recent polls show public trust in the Labour government has fallen to 21%, with personal satisfaction of Blair rating at just 26%.
So instead you will do everything possible to oblige the sodomites.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Ping
Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
The socialists in the UK are slamming the "German Pope" because he doesn't believe sodomites should be allowed to adopt.
I'm not sure which state, but yes, it's happening.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on Pro-Life or Catholic threads.
So, where's the Conservative Party in all this? Lying low?
As far as I can tell, they've been lying low for over a decade.
And this is an example of how the newsie scum set the political agenda by selecting what to say and what to suppress.
But, yes, clearly, if the choice is between "pleasing Catholics" and pleasing sodomites, the British subjects prefer the sodomites.
In Churchill's famous words, "Rum, buggery, and the lash."
The putrid rhetoric from these UK socialists sounds oddly familiar.
"So, where's the Conservative Party in all this? Lying low?"
It would seem so. The parallels between their so-called "conservative" party and our GOP are stunning.
It's time to start treating homosexuals as political subversives. Their objectives can only be realized by the destruction of the current political order; in that sense, they are no different as a class than Islamists.
Yep. Unfortunately, many of the folks who worked there thought that the Church was wrong, and that homosexuals should have been able to adopt. They've bought into the 'don't want to offend' attitude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.