Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: maryz

Some of the changes in the calendar were made throughout the entire Church. However, national bishops conferences apparently have the power to make changes on their own for what they claim are "pastoral" reasons. This is why in the US, most holy days of obligation have either been suppressed or moved to the nearest Sunday, etc. Presumably the good bishops think either their clergy or their laity are too lazy to get to Mass at any other time.

But since individual bishops can also make these changes for their particular diocese, even that is not uniform.

For some reason, a liturgical season they have particularly chosen to mess up is Christmas. They've completely broken the cycle and the unity of the events after the Nativity itself.

Some of them defend this by pointing out that the Eastern rites celebrate these events on a totally different calendar, but to my mind, that really doesn't matter.

The celebration of the Ephiphany on Jan. 6 dates way back and was very much entrenched in Western cultural practices - by the year 380, for example, it was a "legal holiday" in Spain, a day when no business was done (Christmas had at one time been celebrated on Jan. 6th as well, but by that time had been moved to Dec. 25). While it still remains on the 6th in many countries, the US bishops for some reason wanted to break with that, make the whole feast unimportant, and destroy the cultural practices grown up around it. Much of Vatican II was, in my opinion, directed at breaking up Catholic culture, a large part of which revolved around the liturgical cycle. The "reformers" succeeded abundantly, alas, particularly in the US.


8 posted on 01/06/2007 5:33:09 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: livius
I was surprised when our priest announced last week that Jan 1st was not a holy day of obligation.

Although it is considered one in Canada, it is not in the US, something about it falling on a Monday.

He did however encourage us to attend Mass regardless.

9 posted on 01/06/2007 5:40:43 AM PST by mware (By all that you hold dear... on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: livius

Thanks for the additional info.

Wasn't the Epiphany at one time celebrated as a bigger feast than Christmas? Can't remember where I heard it. Maybe it was my mother telling me that when my grandmother was growing up in Ireland, they gave and received presents on the Epiphany.

Well, just one more proof (as if one were needed) that the American bishops, for the most part, aren't worth the paper they're printed on.


11 posted on 01/06/2007 5:49:39 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: livius
Some of the changes in the calendar were made throughout the entire Church. However, national bishops conferences apparently have the power to make changes on their own for what they claim are "pastoral" reasons. This is why in the US, most holy days of obligation have either been suppressed or moved to the nearest Sunday, etc.

Such diocesan and national parochialism tears at the very fabric of being truly catholic. When the church ceases to celebrate a universal feast she ceases to be a universal church.

17 posted on 01/06/2007 7:19:29 PM PST by lightman (The Office of the Keys should be exercised as some ministry needs to be exorcised)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson