Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mutiny in the Big Apple - New York Archdiocese
Whispers in the Loggia ^ | J+M+J 13 Oct A.D. 2006 | Rocco Palmo

Posted on 10/13/2006 5:48:15 AM PDT by Maeve

Mutiny in the Big Apple *EXCLUSIVE -- MUST CREDIT WHISPERS*

In 1983, the new bishop of Scranton was consulted on the appointment of a new archbishop of New York.

John O'Connor was familiar with the See given his long service as a Navy chaplain, culminating with his four years as auxiliary bishop to the Military Vicar, Cardinal Terence Cooke. O'Connor later made it known that, while the new archbishop would inevitably face some difficulties, he opined that none would be due to the New York presbyterate, who served well, loved the church and were loyal to their archbishop.

Less than seven months after his installation in Scranton, Bishop O'Connor was promoted to the Big Apple. He may only be gone six years, but how times change.

Long-simmering tensions among a broad cross-section of the archdiocese's priests broke into the open today with the circulation of an anonymous letter under the authorship of a group calling itself "A Committee of Concerned Clergy for the Archdiocese of New York." Saying that, "At no time has the relationship between the Ordinary and the priests of the Archdiocese been so fractured and seemingly hopeless as it is now," the authors have urged their confreres to lodge "a formal vote of 'NO Confidence'" (emphases original) in Cardinal Edward M. Egan, who became archbishop in 2000. Using strong language throughout the 950-word missive, the authors allege a widespread finding that Egan's relationship with his priests has been "defined by dishonesty, deception, disinterest and disregard."

The cardinal turns 75 on 2 April, when he must submit his letter of resignation to Pope Benedict XVI.

In its entirety, the letter and accompanying ballot are published below for the first time outside of the New York presbyterate. As he recovers from a September knee-replacement, the cardinal's intense displeasure at the move has already become known.

Joseph Zwilling, director of communications for the archdiocese, declined comment on the document.

***************************************

October 2006

Dear Brother Priest:

A Committee of Concerned Clergy for the Archdiocese of New York has met to discuss the critical condition of the Archdiocese of New York. As you would understand, because of the severely vindictive nature of Cardinal Egan,this committee must remain anonymous. This letter is being sent to many priests throughout the Archdiocese so that at each Vicariate meeting a formal vote of “NO Confidence” can be exercised with regard to Cardinal Edward Egan in his role as Archbishop of New York. As you know, the collective memory of the presbyterate cannot recall a time in recent history when the morale of priests has been so broken and low. Some of our elderly priests can well recall the Cardinal Spellman years. Many remember the tenure of Cardinal Cooke and certainly everyone remembers Cardinal O’Connor. At no time has the relationship between the Ordinary and the priests of the Archdiocese been so fractured and seemingly hopeless as it is now.

Since his arrival in New York, the Cardinal has given his time, attention and interest to matters financial while paying little or no attention to the spiritual needs and concerns of the priests and faithful of the Archdiocese. During the last six years the Priests of the Archdiocese of New York have been patient, understanding, tolerant and loyal. Several attempts have been made to open avenues of communication with the Cardinal but to avail. During the last six years, the Cardinal’s relations with the Priests of New York have been defined by dishonesty, deception, disinterest and disregard. Far too many of our brothers can speak personally of the arrogant and cavalier manner in which they have been treated by the Cardinal. Early in his tenure, the cruel and ruthless way in which several priests who served on the seminary faculty were dismissed, was an adumbration of how many other priests would also be treated. Time and again, the Cardinal fails to be the Father that every bishop must be to his priests.

With regard to important policies and decisions that impact upon the welfare of the Archdiocese, it is evident that the Cardinal does not seek advice or counsel from the many competent and experienced priests who so faithfully serve as pastors and members of his chancery staff. Instead, it is regrettably and seemingly apparent that the Cardinal relies on the advice of his priest-secretary [Msgr Gregory Mustaciuolo] who enjoys a most limited and meager pastoral experience.

The Fifth Anniversary of September 11th was a sad reminder of the Cardinal’s decision to leave New York only two days after the attack, during a time when the city desperately needed a spiritual leader. How sad, painful and disappointing it was to hear the tabloids referring to the then Mayor Giuliani as the “Shepherd of the City”. Since that time, the Cardinal has continued to fail in his role as Shepherd. Pope John Paul II referred to New York as the Capital of the World. How unfortunate it is that the voice of the Archbishop of New York is almost never heard in that “Capital”. The Cardinal demonstrates an unnatural fear of the media and he forfeits the great opportunity to employ the media as a means of addressing the many contemporary questions of faith and morals. It is unthinkable that in this millennium a Successor to the Apostles would shrink from such a valuable opportunity for evangelization and hide himself within the walls of his residence.

Sadly, it is evident that this Cardinal is unable to deal with the complexities, problems and challenges of an Archdiocese of the magnitude and diversity of New York. For these reasons and more, the Priests of the Archdiocese of New York must express a vote of NO CONFIDENCE. Such a vote would encourage the Papal Nuncio and the Holy Father to strongly consider accepting the Cardinal’s resignation in April,2007, when he reaches the age of retirement, rather than at a future and uncertain date before his 80th birthday, as can often be the case with retiring Cardinals. The search for a new Archbishop should begin sooner rather than later. Rome must know that the priests and people of New York desperately need a Bishop who will be “strong, loving and wise” (II Timothy: 1:7): a Bishop who will love his priests, seeing them as his spiritual sons and faithful assistants: a Bishop who will begin the healing that is so desperately needed in this Archdiocese: a Bishop who will preach and teach without fear of seeing his name in a newspaper: a Bishop who will truly see holiness in Truth.

The Committee suggests that at each vicariate meeting a secret ballot be taken in which each priest who is present could vote. It was thought that only priests and no deacons should participate in this vote. The votes should be counted at that meeting and the tally registered on the enclosed form. The form should be signed by two witnesses and a copy sent to each of the Vicars General. It would be incumbent upon the Vicars General to report the vote to the Papal Nuncio. At this important and critical moment, let us move forward with prayerful courage.

After prayeful consideration, I cast my vote as:

NO CONFIDENCE in Cardinal Egan: _____

CONFIDENCE in Cardinal Egan:_____

ABSTENTION: ______

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each Vicariate should send a copy of this form to each of the Vicars General-

Vicariate: ____________________________

Date of Meeting:________________________

Number of Priests in attendance: ____________

Number voting - NO CONFIDENCE: __________

Number voting – CONFIDENCE: _____________

Number voting – ABSTENTION: _____________

These vote was taken and counted in the presence of all those in attendance at the Vicariate meeting. Witnessed by:

___________________ __________________


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: archdiocese; catholic; egan; ny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: dsc

Thanks, I will.


81 posted on 10/14/2006 8:54:24 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Our Lady's Hat Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Savonarola

Will do.


82 posted on 10/14/2006 8:55:18 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Our Lady's Hat Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: narses; BlackElk; sitetest
Hmm. Maybe you can site for me one example from Tradition where a Pope has chosen a schism to educate his clergy.
83 posted on 10/14/2006 9:26:18 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; Maeve; sittnick; ninenot; Tax-chick; bornacatholic; Convert from ECUSA
Wideawake and Maeve (#73): Thanks to both of you for the info. This old Elk's memory ain't what it used to be.

Partly this Elk's mind is boggled over the news this week from the alumni magazine of my old Jesuit (and once Catholic) prep school that one of its biggest contributors this year was some matching fund being run in the name of none other than George Soros! I am betting that the reason is not revealed in the magazine. The College Preparatory School of St. Robert Bellarmine at Fairfield, Connecticut, needs the prayers of all Catholics if Soros is sending them large sums of money.

84 posted on 10/14/2006 11:11:33 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I meant to observe that Egan's predecessor at Bridgeport, Bishop Walter Curtis, was outright hostile to the Tridentine Mass. Bill Buckley petitioned repeatedly for a Tridentine Mass at Stamford and was regularly refused. In that context, whatever Egan's drawbacks, he was friendly enough to the Tridentine to allow its regular use in two cities in a geographically tiny diocese. That was more than many bishops would do at the time.


85 posted on 10/14/2006 12:41:42 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Maeve

Very interesting. I frankly have never thought much of Cardinal Egan. I didn't like listening to him; he sounded like such a weenie! Bishops should speak with confidence and sound like they have some authority!


86 posted on 10/14/2006 4:00:40 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maeve
WOW!!!!!

I miss Cardinal O'Connor. He was a warrior.

87 posted on 10/14/2006 4:03:18 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Didn't he also try to bust Fr. Pavone down to parish priest on Long Island?

Yeap

88 posted on 10/14/2006 4:10:52 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

Wasn't Egan at Bridgeport before he was appointed to take John Cardinal O'Connors position?


89 posted on 10/14/2006 4:16:19 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

I think they've needed those prayers for awhile. A friend of mine, very well known in pro-life circles, made the mistake of sending her son there. The Jebbies did their level best to turn him into somebody who virtually spit every time his mother's name or the words pro-life were mentioned. The things he said - which obviously csme directly from his teachers - were truly appalling.


90 posted on 10/14/2006 5:17:03 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Ummmnnhhh...

The NYC situation has always been rather odd. Pre-Spellman the Cardinal damn near took NY banko. Spellman fixed that, but was less-than-rigorous in preaching and teaching sexual mores. Cooke was Cooke. Next guy was another fiscal inebriate (God rest his soul) Egan is a fiscal disciplinarian, but FIRST he's extremely ambitious.

Extremely ambitious.


91 posted on 10/15/2006 1:58:12 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ninenot

I prefer to remember Cardinal O'Connor as a courageous leader who was well liked and respected by most of his flock.He had a great self-deprecating sense of humor.It was so good to hear Bill Donohue of the Catholic League speak so positively about Cardinal O'Connor last week on Raymond Arroyo's program on EWTN.


92 posted on 10/15/2006 4:30:01 PM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ardara

O'Connor had LOTS of great qualities. The fact that his time resulted in less-than-desirable financial situation is not a Big Black Mark at all.

But it happened.


93 posted on 10/15/2006 5:38:11 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mware

That is correct.

Egan bio per the USCCB website:

WASHINGTON (May 11, 2000) -- Pope John Paul II has appointed Bishop Edward M. Egan of Bridgeport, Connecticut, as Archbishop of New York. He succeeds Cardinal John J. O'Connor, who died May 3.

Archbishop-designate Egan, 68, has led the Bridgeport diocese since 1988. He was Auxiliary Bishop to Cardinal O'Connor for three years, from 1985 to 1988. He is a native of Chicago and a former official of the Roman Rota, one of the two courts in the Vatican's judicial system.

The announcement was made by Archbishop Gabriel Montalvo, Apostolic Nuncio to the United States.

Archbishop Montalvo said that, until the installation of the new Archbishop, the archdiocese will be under the governance of Most Reverend Robert A. Brucato as Apostolic Administrator. Bishop Brucato has been an Auxiliary Bishop of New York since 1997.

Edward Michael Egan was born April 2, 1932, in Oak Park, Ill. He attended St. Giles parochial school in Oak Park, Quigley Preparatory Seminary in Chicago, and St. Mary of the Lake Seminary in Mundelein, Ill. Following theological studies at the Gregorian University in Rome, where he later received a doctorate in canon law, he was ordained to the priesthood for the Chicago archdiocese, December 15, 1957.

In 1958 he was assigned to the staff of Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago and the following year was named Secretary and Master of Ceremonies to Cardinal Albert Meyer. He was also named Assistant Chancellor.

Archbishop-designate Egan served as assistant chancellor of the Archdiocese of Chicago from 1964 until 1968, when he was appointed Co-chancellor and Secretary for the archdiocesan commissions on Human Relations and Ecumenism. During this period, he was also a member of the Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue (ARC), and a participant in many ecumenical and civic commissions, including Vice-Chairman of the Chicago Conference on Religion and Race, founding member of the North American Acacdemy of Ecumenists, and a board member of the Metropolitan Housing and Planning Council.

From 1960 to 1965, Archbishop-designate Egan was Assistant Vice Rector of the North American College in Rome. He also served on the faculty of the North American College, teaching Moral Theology and Canon Law.

In 1972 he was appointed an auditor of the Sacred Roman Rota, which is the ordinary court of appeals for canonical cases appealed to the Vatican, particularly regarding the validity of marriage. He served as a judge of the Tribunal of the Rota from 1973 to 1985.

Archbishop-designate Egan was also a professor of Procedural Law on the law faculty of the Rota, a Consultor to the Sacred Congregation for the Clergy, and a professor of jurisprudence at the Pontifical Gregorian University. In addition to Latin, he speaks Italian, French and Spanish, and has published articles on legal issues in canonical journals.

He was named Auxiliary Bishop of New York on April 4, 1985, and served as Vicar of Education for the New York archdiocese. He was appointed Bishop of Bridgeport on November 8, 1988.

In 1983, Archbishop-designate Egan was a member of the committee of six canonists who reviewed the final draft of the New Code of Canon Law with Pope John Paul II.

The Archdiocese of New York was erected as a diocese April 8, 1808, and created an archdiocese July 19, 1850. It comprises the Boroughs of Manhattan, Bronx, and Richmond of the City of New York, and the Counties of Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Sullivan, Ulster and Westchester in the State of New York. It has a Catholic population of 2,371,355 in a total population of 5,254,300.


94 posted on 10/15/2006 8:10:34 PM PDT by incredulous joe (“Whosoever loveth me loveth my hound.” -- St. Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson