Catholic ping!
"Every sperm is sacred/Every sperm is grand!"
"Sexual Suicide" bump
Good article, and very true. I attribute many of our problems in the Church - that is, the attitude problems, which in turn lead to doctrinal problems - with the contracepting mentality and the fact that the clergy not only permitted but even encouraged the faithful to take an attitude of defiance to traditional Catholic teaching (reaffirmed even by one such as Paul VI) on the matter. This planted a fundamental disconnect between the faith and the practice of the church, sowed disobedience, and gave people the idea that they could pick the parts that appealed to them and ignore the rest.
This is without even getting into its disastrous effect on family life, sexual life, the Catholic birth rate, and the future of Europe...
For your information:
Christopher West's Theology of the Body Webiste
Books, tapes, CDs, DVDs, etc.
From book by the same name by Pope John Paul II.
2399 The regulation of births represents one of the aspects of responsible fatherhood and motherhood. Legitimate intentions on the part of the spouses do not justify recourse to morally unacceptable means (for example, direct sterilization or contraception). |
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil:
|
|
||||||||||||||
Couple say Natural Family Planning strengthens marriage |
Clerical Contraception (Important Read! By Fr. Thomas J. Euteneuer)
I have to say that this point:
Contracepting men and women who are not warned of their sin and who therefore do not repent of it risk the death of their immortal souls ...
is accurate but a bit, er, nuanced. While contraception is objectively "grave matter," the couple is only guilty of that particular mortal sin if they have full knowledge of its sinfulness and full consent of the will.
It's true that they're guilty of venial sin, even if they do not have the full knowledge and full consent, and that participation in the sin of contraception can lead to other sins and therefore, as Father says, "risk the death of their immortal souls.
Pastorally speaking, is it right to speak of such things from the pulpit? Children are present, and in such circumstances specific sexual matters are generally eschewed in favor of circumlocutions.