Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can traditions contradict God's completed Word?
The Mountain Retreat ^ | 1998 | Tony Warren

Posted on 08/14/2006 11:19:14 AM PDT by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-298 next last
To: Gamecock

bookmark


121 posted on 08/15/2006 2:16:53 PM PDT by cf_river_rat (And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee...Genesis 12:3(a), KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
which most certainly included children,

That is an unfounded assumption on your part. The passages in question do not mention children. Therefore, you have a pure argument from silence in this regard, and it is not helpful.

Worse, there is mentioned in some manner in each household baptism story a note about those baptized coming to faith. This would not be reportable if those households included infants.

A better approach to justifying infant baptism is to recognize it as a probationary sign developed as a tradition to demonstrate a child's place within the household of God, for the certainly are set apart (sanctified) in the eyes of the Lord. "Otherwise your children would be unholy, but as it is they are holy."

This all holds until they "accept for themselves the gift of faith."

Just my 2 cents worth.

122 posted on 08/15/2006 2:27:40 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Supporting the troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; WriteOn

Actually, there is both a spiritual lineage and an ordination lineage that should be recognized.

In my opinion, a member of the PCA can trace his faith through his doctrines back to the earliest Christian teachings.

Also, a member of the PCA can trace his faith through faithful men back to the earliest Christian teachings. Their history goes back to the Reformation, through those transitional figures to the same historic church that Roman Catholics accept, to the early fathers, and from those fathers to the early church.


123 posted on 08/15/2006 2:33:04 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Supporting the troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: dangus
XS>>> and the Ru'ach HaKodesh had nothing to do with it? <<

Probably not, since Ru'ach HaKodesh sounds like a Hebrew word, and the people who selected the books to include in the Christian bible spoke Greek. But, then, I suppose, if you really expected an answer, you'd be a mensch and use English translations , rather than having fun showing off, "ooo! I know some Hebrew phrases!"

117 posted on 08/15/2006 12:08:32 PM MDT by dangus

My L-rd and Master is YHvH I know He is King of the Universe , Creator of All.

I'm not sure about Dios or Theos or Got.

My Redeemer is "YHvH is my salvation" or Yahu'shua as He was named by His mother Miriam.

b'shem Yahu'shua
124 posted on 08/15/2006 2:48:11 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Ps. 144:1 Praise be to YHvH, my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

"Actually, calling it 'Sola Scriptura' might be contrued as a bit of a misnomer, because it is not a doctrine which teaches that we believe that there are not other authorities, nor that they have no value or place. Rather, it means that all other authorities must be subordinate to the Word of God."

The above quote is very important in understanding the Reformers idea of "sola scriptura" in that it really meant SUPREME OR FINAL UNQUESTIONABLE AUTHORITY rather than no other authorities in the life of a Christian. Common sense and tradition, as a part of what may be termed "general revelation" have a place in guiding a Christian, where direction cannot be clearly discerned from the bible...we get advice from other Christians (call it "tradition" if they are from the past) and intelligence/education all the time--which is fine, in fact the best attitude, as long as we put these authorities under the supreme authority of scripture. This counters too the common Roman assumption of hyper-individualism of Protestants... a "bible alone and I" way of looking at things...which surely leads to schism and error.

All and all an excellent post, well argued.


125 posted on 08/15/2006 2:52:54 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WriteOn; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg
Your church was founded by a heretic. ~ WriteOn

WHAT!!! God is a heretic. Say it ain't so. Actually, WriteOn, since Gamecock and I are a part of the same group, I can speak on this. We are a part of those entrusted by God to hold the very doctrines of the truth of Scripture and we don't merely trace our church back a mere 2000 years, as if Christ the Eternal King could reign without subjects. No, we trace our church back to the beginning.

Peter and his successors, as you put it, are made out by some in the church to be johnny come lately given that the church had been in existence for at least 4000 years prior Peter's day.

What's your pastor's pedigree? :) ~ WriteOn

Not a johnny come lately. ;)

We believe and confess one single catholic or universal church... This church has existed from the beginning of the world and will last until the end, as appears from the fact that Christ is eternal King who cannot be without subjects. ~ Belgic Confession.

post tenebras lux,

126 posted on 08/15/2006 3:07:31 PM PDT by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Bump for a great post!


127 posted on 08/15/2006 3:37:45 PM PDT by technochick99 ( Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I have no argument with the above statements, but we obviously have a different view of the object of faith...Christ. As I stated faith establishes the law, but that is not the law of Moses, but the law of Christ, AKA law of love. Do I believe in obedience? Certainly! One cannot have a faithful wife who is unfaithful. That said, you are running together the old and new covenants, and in effect denying the sufficiency of Christ's shed blood.

I think there is danger when the New Covenant is interpreted so broadly as to erase one of the 10 Commandments, espcially in light of all the warnings against lawlessness.

But the point of my post is that Protestantism is supposed to be Biblical. If an educated un-religious man, say an old Soviet or a Cuban, read a Bible cover to cover, what day would he keep holy?

128 posted on 08/15/2006 3:46:56 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: dangus; Gamecock
The Catholic Church insists that Prima Sabbati means "first of the week." Kerry insists that it doesn't. And he can make what seems like a bold promise that no-one can prove that the bible makes Sunday the new Sabbath, because if anyone does point out to him where it does, he just insists, "That's not what that REEEEALLY means!"

Au contrare', monfraire. The Catholic Church boldly professes that it changed the day of worship. I did not come to my belief lightly. I searched that Bible for 4 years trying to prove Sunday. NIV, KJV, Red Letter Catholic, you name it. No dice.

29 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"From this same Catholic Church you have accepted your Sunday, and that Sunday, as the Lord's day, she had handed down as a tradition; and the entire Protestant world has accepted it as tradition, for you have not an iota of Scripture to establish it. Therefore that which you have accepted as your rule of faith, inadequate as it of course it is, as well as your Sunday, you have accepted on the authority of the Roman Catholic Church." D. B. Ray, The Papal Controversy, 1892, page 179

30 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"I have repeatedly offered $1000 to anyone who can prove to me from the Bible alone that I am bound to keep Sunday holy. There is no such law in the Bible. It is a law of the holy Catholic Church alone. The Bible says, 'Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy.' The Catholic Church says: 'No. By my divine power I abolish the Sabbath day and command you to keep holy the first day of the week.' And lo! The entire civilized world bows down in a reverent obedience to the command of the holy Catholic Church. Priest Thomas Enright, CSSR, President of Redemptorist College, Kansas City, Missouri, in a lecture at Hartford, Kansas, and printed in the American Sentinel, June 1883, a New York Roman Catholic journal.

31 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"The Catholic Church for over one thousand years before the existence of a Protestant, by virtue of her Divine mission, changed the day [of worship] from Saturday to Sunday. ... The Christian Sabbath is therefore to this day the acknowledged offspring of the Catholic Church, as Spouse of the Holy Ghost, without a word of remonstrance from the Protestant world." Editorial, The Catholic Mirror (Baltimore), September 23, 1893.

32 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"You may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify." Cardinal Gibbons (for many years head of the Catholic Church in America), The Faith of Our Fathers (92d ed., rev.; Baltimore: John Murphy Company), p.89.

33 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Reason and sense demand the acceptance of one or the other of these alternatives: either Protestantism and the keeping holy of Saturday or Catholicity and the keeping holy of Sunday. Compromise is impossible." James Cardinal Gibbons, Catholic Mirror, Dec. 23, 1893.

34 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Nowhere in the Bible do we find that Christ or the Apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath Day, that is the 7th day of the week, Saturday. Today most Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the [Catholic] Church outside the Bible." "To Tell You the Truth," The Catholic Virginian, 22 (October 3, 1947), 9.

35 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"The Divine institution of a day of rest from ordinary occupations and of religious worship, transferred by the authority of the [Catholic] Church from the Sabbath, the last day, to Sunday the first day of the week, ... is one of the most patent signs that we are a Christian people." James Cardinal Gibbons, The Cross and the Flag, Our Church and Country (New York: The Catholic Historical League of America, 1899), pp. 24, 25.

36 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Sunday is founded, not on Scripture, but on tradition, and is distinctly a Catholic institution. As there is no Scripture for the transfer of the day of rest from the last to the first day of the week, Protestants ought to keep their Sabbath on Saturday and thus leave Catholics in full possession of Sunday." Catholic Record, Sept. 17, 1893

37 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"They (the Protestants) deem it their duty to keep the Sunday Holy. Why? Because the Catholic Church tells them to do so. They have no other reason... The observance of Sunday thus comes to be an ecclesiastical law entirely distinct from the divine law of Sabbath observance... The author of the Sunday law... is the Catholic Church." Ecclesiastical Review, Feb. 1914.

38 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Q. Which is the Sabbath Day?

"A. Saturday is the Sabbath day.

"Q. Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday?

"A. We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday." Peter Guierman, The Convert's Catechism of Catholic Doctrine (1957 ed.), p.50. Copyright 1930 by B. Herder Book Co., St.Louis.

39 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Nowhere in the Bible is it stated that worship should be changed from Saturday to Sunday." Martin J. Scott, Things Catholics Are Asked About (New York: P. J. Kennedy & Sons) p. 136.

40 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Q. Have you any other way of proving that the [Catholic] Church has power to institute festivals of precept?

"A. Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her; ... she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday the seventh day, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority." Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism (3rd American ed., rev.; New York: T. W. Strong, late Edward Dunigan & Bro., 1876), p. 174.

41 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"But the Protestant says: How can I receive the teachings of an apostate Church? How, we ask, have you managed to receive her teachings all your life, in direct opposition to your recognized teacher, the Bible, on the Sabbath question?" The Christian Sabbath (2nd ed.; Baltimore: The Catholic Mirror, 1893), p. 29, 30.

42 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"If Protestants would follow the Bible, they should worship God on the Sabbath Day. In keeping Sunday they are following a law of the Catholic Church." Albert Smith (Chancellor of the Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore), replying for the Cardinal in a letter of February 10, 1920.)

43 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"It was the Catholic Church which, by the authority of JESUS CHRIST, has transferred this [Sabbath] rest to the Sunday in remembrance of the resurrection of our Lord. Thus the observance of Sunday by the Protestants is an homage they pay, in spite of themselves, to the authority of the [Catholic] Church." Louis Gaston de Segur, Plain Talk About The Protestantism of To-day (Boston: Patrick Donahoe, 1868), p. 225.

44 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Protestantism, in discarding the authority of the [Catholic] Church, has no good reason for its Sunday theory, and ought, logically, to keep Saturday as the Sabbath. ..." John Gilmary Shae, "The Observance of Sunday and Civil Laws for Its Enforcement," The American Catholic Quarterly Review, 8 (January, 1883), 152.

45 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"The (Catholic) Church changed the observance of the Sabbath to Sunday by right of the divine, infallible authority given to her by her Founder, Jesus Christ. The Protestant, claiming the Bible to be the only guide of faith, has no warrant for observing Sunday. In this matter the Seventh Day Adventist is the only consistent Protestant." "The Question Box," The Catholic Universe Bulletin, 69 (August 14, 1942), 4.

46 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"The Israelite respects the authority of the Old Testament only, but the [Seventh-day] Adventist, who is a Christian, accepts the New Testament on the same ground as the Old, viz: an inspired record also. He finds that the Bible, his teacher, is consistent in both parts, that the Redeemer, during His mortal life never kept any other day than Saturday. The Gospels plainly evince to Him this fact; whilst, in the pages of the Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles and the Apocalypse, not the vestige of an act canceling the Saturday arrangement can be found." Editorial, The Catholic Mirror (Baltimore), September 2, 1893.

47 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"If the Bible is the only guide for the Christian, then the Seventh Day Adventist is right in observing the Saturday with the Jew." Bertrand L. Conway, The Question Box Answers (New York: The Columbus Press, 1910), p. 254.

48 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"If you follow the Bible alone there can be no question that you are obliged to keep Saturday holy, since that is the day especially prescribed by Almighty God to be kept holy to the Lord." F. G. Lentz, The Question Box (New York: Christian Press Association, 1900), p. 98.

49 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"The Sabbath was Saturday, not Sunday. The Church altered the observance of the Sabbath to the observance of Sunday. Protestants must be rather puzzled by the keeping of Sunday when God distinctly said, 'Keep holy the Sabbath Day.' The word Sunday does not come anywhere in the Bible, so, without knowing it they are obeying the authority of the Catholic Church." Canon Cafferata, The Catechism Explained, p. 89.

50 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

Father Conway: "If the Bible is the only guide for the Christian then the Seventh-day Adventist is right in observing the Saturday with the Jew. But Catholics learn what to believe and do from the Catholic Church, which in Apostolic times made Sunday the day of rest. ... Is it not strange that those who make the Bible their only teacher should inconsistently follow in this matter the tradition of the Church." Question Box Answers, an official publication of the Catholic Church.

51 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

Plain Talk: "The observance of Sunday by Protestants is an homage they pay, in spite of themselves, to the authority of the (Catholic) Church." Plain Talk about Protestantism of Today, by Msgr. Segur (RC).

52 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

John O'Brien, Ph.D., LL.D.: "But since Saturday, not Sunday, is specified in the Bible, isn't it curious that non-Catholics who profess to take their religion directly from the Bible, and not the Church, observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Yes of course, it is inconsistent; but this change was made about 15 centuries before Protestantism was born, and by that time the custom was universally observed. They have continued the custom, even though it rests upon the authority of the Catholic Church and not upon an explicit text in the Bible. That observance remains as a reminder of the Mother Church from which the non-Catholic sects broke away - like a boy running away from home but still carrying in his pocket a picture of his mother or a lock of her hair." Faith of Millions, pp. 543 and 544.

53 Candid Confessions of the Catholic Church!

"Hence, the conclusion is inevitable; namely that of those who follow the Bible as their guide, the Israelites and the Seventh-day Adventists have the exclusive weight of evidence on their side, whilst the Biblical Protestant has not a word in self defense for his substitution of Sunday for Saturday." Catholic Mirror.

129 posted on 08/15/2006 3:54:43 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
"There is nothing in scripture that prohibits dedicating your children to God. There are clear prohibitions against bowing before graven images or statues."

I agree 100%!! Maybe I misunderstood the point of the person who posted that protestants have traditions. I would say that they do, and except for a Luthern Church I attended for a while, I would say they don't contradict what the scripture says.

At this ECLA church, the pastor was trying to convince me that infant baptism was "saving" my child. His closest Biblical support he could give was where a "whole family" was baptized. Needless to say, we left that church.

Sincerely
130 posted on 08/15/2006 4:02:46 PM PDT by ScubieNuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

1. Yeah, I read that the other 652,059 times you posted it.
2. If you haven't figured it out by now, printing unnecessarily in really large fonts is generally considered a sign of mental instability on the internet. Or at least extreme obnoxiousness.
3. In no way do I deny that the Roman Catholic church established Sunday as the holy day of the week. What I was asserting is that the Catholic Church had a biblical reason for doing so, since Christ resurrected on a Sunday.


131 posted on 08/15/2006 4:03:31 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Calvinus
"We believe and confess one single catholic or universal church... This church has existed from the beginning of the world and will last until the end, as appears from the fact that Christ is eternal King who cannot be without subjects. ~ Belgic Confession. "

Good post Lord_Calvinus!

The first gospel message was preached in Genesis 3 along with the concomitant doctrine of imputation.

Those Roman Cats deny the continuity of redemptive history and like some two bit cult pretend that history must be interpreted by a collage of tinpot messianics.
132 posted on 08/15/2006 4:04:43 PM PDT by Blois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"Nor is there anything in scripture that requires the baptizing of infants, nor is there anything that really even mentions the baptizing of infants. "

I agree 100%!!! While I did both (infant baptism and dedication) I know that they were both a demonstration of me and my wifes commitment to raise them in the Christian faith, not "saving" their souls. I did infant baptism to appease my in-laws. I was fairly weak in my understanding back then, but in the overall picture, the baptism didn't do any harm to my children, it only reinforced some bad theology in my in-laws.

This is FAR different from bowing before an image of Mary and saying prayers to her for intercession. Clearly, not supported by the Bible.

Sincerely
133 posted on 08/15/2006 4:08:38 PM PDT by ScubieNuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

Did you have anything to say, or are you just having fun throwing around foreign language words? Here's a tip: Using "G-d" is one thing. Using "L-rd" is downright silly. The Ancient Jews used "Adonai" (Lord) precisely to avoid writing YHVH. Avoiding writing "Lord," and then using the tetragrammaticon is about as sensible as a vegetarian smack addict.


134 posted on 08/15/2006 4:10:26 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: dangus
I pray your name will be found in the book of Life.

135 posted on 08/15/2006 4:14:08 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Ps. 144:1 Praise be to YHvH, my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: dangus
1. Cool

2. The font comes from the page I got it from. I realize I have a problem with fonts. I'm seeking a 12 step to get me through.

3. The Bible doesn't say Jesus was resurrected on Sunday. But if it did, what of it? If Jesus was resurrected on Mardi Gras, would the priest toss out beads during communion?

136 posted on 08/15/2006 4:15:31 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: conservatative strategery

I wonder if you can give a complete and accurate account of the doctrine of praying to Mary in such a way that a Catholic schooled in theology would say,"Yes. That's what we believe and teach."


137 posted on 08/15/2006 5:23:32 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Reality is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Calm_Cool_and_Elected

ping


138 posted on 08/15/2006 5:31:56 PM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
"Did Christ acquire a sinful nature?"

While the basis of your answer is correct, you avoided answering my question. Maybe you are not a SDA, but in the official SDA "Questions on Doctrine" states, "Christ took upon His sinless nature our sinful nature...Christ took human nature and bore the infirmities and degeneracy of the race. He took our nature and its deteriorating condition." (pp. 654-656) Of course if this was true, there could have been no sinless sacrifice, no hope for sinners, no Savior.

"Is it possible for anyone to have the assurance of salvation?"

I noticed no clear answer. SDA's believe in no assurance, because failure to "keep the law" is loss of salvation. This is salvation by works which clearly violates Eph 2:8&9

For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Plus it ignores verses such as...1John 5:13

These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

Either Christ is sufficient or He needs our help. Which by the way, your "works salvation" is a very Catholic view.

"Why is it that nine of the commandments are reiterated in the New Testament, but the "duty" to keep the seventh day as Sabath is not mentioned ONCE? "

I see you avoided the answer. Let me show you...

1)To worship God only (No less then 50 times)
2)Idolitry (condemned 12 times)
3)Profanity (condemned 4 times)
4)Keep the Sabbath..........NO TIMES
5)Honoring parents (taught 6 times)
6)Murder (condemned 6 times)
7)Adultery (condemned 12 times)
8)Theft (condemned 4 times)
9)False witness (condemned 4 times)
10)Covetousness (condemned 9 times)

Where is the NT verse that states failing to keep the Sabbath is a sin, or we are commanded to keep the Sabbath?

"When the New Testament lists sins, why is Sabath breaking absent?"

Your responses are vague and don't answer the question.

It isn't. It is included in broader terms."

Again, that's like the Catholics claiming Mary has special powers because of the "broader terms" of "blessed." You have alot more in common with the Catholics than you realize.

"The Sabbath is the foremost thing we can do to show God we love Him."

Where is your Scriptural support for that line?

Check out these listings of sins, and not ONCE is Sabbath breaking mentioned. Mark 7:21-22; Romans 1:29-32; Galatians 5:19-21; 2 Timothy 3:1-4.

"Why does Ephesians 1:13 and 4:30 say that the seal of God is the indwelling of the Holy Spirit and not the keeping of the Sabath? "

Your response does not answer my question.

"Are you saying the indwelling of the Holy Spirit licenses sin?"

Instead you are trying to redirect with some wild goose question. Tell you what...you post Scriptural support for keeping the Sabbath is the seal of God on His people, and I'll follow your wild goose redirection.

"Do you keep the Sabath by observing from sunset to sunset? No burden carried? No fire kindled (Would that include fire in the engine of your car)? And no cooking?"

You responded with..."What I do to keep the Sabbath holy is not up for debate nor is it any of your business."

I believe you don't face up to this question because you know that you fail to keep the Sabbath by the standards laid down in Levidicus (sunset to sunset), Jerimiah (no burden carried), and Exodus (fire and cooking). If you fail to keep one of the Commands you fail them all.

James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.

"Do you then enforce these violations by death? (Numbers 15) "

Your answer sidesteps the punishment for failing to observe the Sabbath. Read Numbers 15:33-40. If Sabbath keeping is as important today as it was in Moses' day, then the same rules of inforcement would apply. If not, then where in the NT does Jesus recind the punishment of Sabbath keeping?

"I have repeatedly offered $1000 to anyone who can prove to me from the Bible alone that I am bound to keep Sunday holy. "

I am not interested in such an offer. I believe you are misfocused on when. I recommend reading Jesus's answer to the woman at the well. She was looking for when, where, and how to worship God, and Jesus mentions nothing about a day or place.

John 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. John 4:24 God [is] a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship [him] in spirit and in truth.

You can worship God in spirit and in truth on anyday of the week.

Sincerely
139 posted on 08/15/2006 5:52:35 PM PDT by ScubieNuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

Well, at least you still have a sense of humor :^D


140 posted on 08/15/2006 6:18:25 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson