If you say this sort of thing in a public forum, and won't supply the evidence to support it, then it amounts to slander, even if specific parties are not mentioned. (We all know who you are talking about.)
It seems to me both sides are prone to dish out the epithets when convenient. But, hey, who's counting?
"Many posters", not just one or two. There are at most four of us postmils on this thread. Given "many posters", chances are only one of us hasn't managed to come off "more spiritual" like the rest of us have.
What did I do wrong?
Why don't you just read this thread and see if you can find it.
To a Christian with a sense of history, the conflation of the terms "spiritual" with "good" sounds so quaintly victorian. Not to say gnostic. I rejoice to concede that particular bragging right, and yield the floor to my far more spiritual brothers, the dispensationalists.
You see, I have no desire to be "spiritual." I am a man, as my wife can tell you several times each week. I am not an angel. My materiality is something I rejoice in, since this is what God has made me to be and to enjoy. God looked at His material creation and called it "good." And who am I to argue with my Maker? God considers the material creation SO good that the Word became flesh without being defiled, then died and rose again to ultimately redeem all of creation for His glory. "For God so loved the world..." that He took steps to redeem a race or restored caretakers for it.
I do not wish to be "spiritual." I seek grace to be obedient.
Do you see the difference? Satan is a purely spiritual entity -- but not an obedient one. Not a good one. As a redeemed man, I have opportunities and responsibilities to care for my corner of creation, to steward all that God entrusts to me, to husband it (and her!) and to see to it that I put more into the system than I take out of it. To leave my corner of the world a bit better than I found it, so that my children will get a head start in their race.
The problem with seeking to be "spiritual" is that the seeker can too easily spiral into his navel. The "spiritual" guy can be a failure as a husband, father, employee, and steward of the opportunities God drops in his lap -- and still congratulate himself on how "spiritual" he is. In a secret zone, defined so narrowly that no one can see it, he is "victorious." Who cares if his house and family and nation are crumbling around him? "I got mine, jack. To hell with everything else."
A truly incarnational Christianity cannot be dispensational. We do not have the right to despise the world God has entrusted to our care. To do so ultimately maligns our Creator. Gnosticism, like dispensationalism, writes off the whole world in exchange for esoteric "spiritual" thrills. Both are disobedient to the total counsel of God, and the flourishing of His Kingdom.