Posted on 07/01/2006 4:34:16 PM PDT by sionnsar
She Will Not Be Alone
By Barbara C. Harris
Friday, June 30, 2006
The election of the Rt. Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori as 26th Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church is momentous for several reasons -- not the least of which is that many General Convention deputies, visitors and bishops themselves did not believe the House of Bishops had the moral courage to choose the obviously superior nominee. The conventional wisdom was that a "compromise" person, palatable to both sides of the church and the rest of the Anglican Communion, would be chosen in the hope that we might "get on with it" -- whatever "it" is.
It has been reported that a few retired conservative bishops (as many as nine) voted for her to demonstrate the split in the American church, but that can be documented only by those who would have concocted such a self-defeating scheme.
That Bishop Jefferts Schori becomes the first known woman primate in the history of the Anglican Communion sends positive as well as negative shock waves around the world.
The hope that this self-assured, intelligent, poised and compassionate woman -- one might even say regal in bearing -- brings more than just a passive commitment to full inclusion of all of God's people in the life of church and society and an equal commitment to reconciliation bodes well. Similarly, her election brings a new sense of belonging to the many voiceless women throughout the Communion who can see in her not only an icon but also an advocate.
But as in most situations, not all is sweetness and light. Even as many of us embraced and celebrated Bishop Jefferts Schori's election in those early moments at Trinity Church, Columbus (where we were, by rule and custom, to be sequestered until the House of Deputies could be notified by two representatives of the House of Bishops and could vote to concur in the election) the whining, dissident so-called " traditionalists" were out the front door and on their cell phones conveying the balloting results to their constituents. One phone call recipient was overheard in the men's room back at the convention center to say: "the bitch got it."
Many of us lamented that on the final day of General Convention Bishop Katharine vocally supported acceptance of Resolution B033 which, in effect, became a moratorium on consent to the election of a gay or lesbian person in a same-sex relationship (despite the numbers of which we already are aware) and what this has said to our GLBT brothers and sisters. Whether she was pressured to do so remains an open question. Even before she spoke, the House of Bishops was told that passage of the resolution was the price of the "ticket" to the Lambeth tea party. It would have been more honest for Presiding Bishop Griswold to have said this up front and saved us the time and the torture of pointless discussion, amendments and substitues. Similarly, her appearance in the House of Deputies -- which caused a deputy who had approached the microphone to speak against the resolution to instead dissolve in tears and urge its passage -- threw that chamber into confusion and resulted in its passage there.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams. APOSTASY INTREP
And that was from the gay lobby.
Narg. What a bunch of barely-intelligible p.c. blither.
(Does that sound "loving" and "inclusive" enough?)
LOL!
I was long gone when she became a bishop (though I did heard a bit about how she was unqualified and inexperienced, but being a black female overcame those limitations), and she retired before Arlin added me to the Traditional Anglican ping list and I started learning what had been transpiring Back There.
Yes, Harris is not the brightest bulb in the box, and most laypeople had a better theological education than she did. (I'm the one who put "airhead" as a keyword.) And this article shows it.
She was only made a "bishop" for political correctness' sake. And now she shows that she is not only a dumb-dumb, but an arrogant dumb-dumb as well!!!!
Reconciliation must have a different meaning than I'm aware of...there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of attempt to reconcile the traditional believers.
Hallmark of the Left: everything gets redefined (a polite way of saying they're lying). You know, "All are equal, but some are more equal than others." "It depends on what the definition of 'is' is."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.