1 posted on
05/30/2006 11:02:47 AM PDT by
x5452
To: x5452
The man has agreed to not even speak his own native tongue while visiting Poland, yet apparently not allowing other people to schedule his entire visit down to the last second is offensive.
What could possibly satisfy his critics?
2 posted on
05/30/2006 11:06:01 AM PDT by
wideawake
To: x5452
I wonder how many of these people are "upset?" Few if any I bet. Most likely a figment of the writer's imagination.
To: x5452
He already visited Auschwitz. What more should he do?
8 posted on
05/30/2006 11:33:15 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
To: x5452
Methinks the reporter wanted to create the "controversy" and then report on it; to "make the news" as it were.
I don't think this report is credible.
-Theo
9 posted on
05/30/2006 11:49:11 AM PDT by
TeĆ³filo
(Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org - A Catholic Blog of News, Commentary and Opinion)
To: x5452
The Polish Resistance should ALSO have had a visit IF he had paid tribute to the Jews of the ghetto. See none or see them all. He made the right decision under the circumstances. Non-story.
I like this pope--and I'm not Catholic.
14 posted on
05/30/2006 8:16:35 PM PDT by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson