To: Conservative Coulter Fan
2 posted on
05/04/2006 1:29:30 PM PDT by
Conservative Coulter Fan
(I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
I just find it a turn off more than anything....
3 posted on
05/04/2006 1:29:34 PM PDT by
misterrob
(Death once came calling for Jack Bauer. Death went home to mommy with a wedgie and no lunch money)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
5 posted on
05/04/2006 2:49:48 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: Paddlefish; keithtoo; Imgr8t; Kimmers; TXBubba; dfwright; Mrs. Don-o; DJ MacWoW; ...
6 posted on
05/04/2006 2:56:21 PM PDT by
Conservative Coulter Fan
(I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Good job. I've bookmarked it.
12 posted on
05/04/2006 3:09:14 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Liberal Episcopalians who support the reverend Robinson have a very different view of Scripture than you or I. I mean its authority. Specifically they reject not only the strictures of the Law but what Paul says about the matter. Generally speaking they deny Paul's authority and set it against that of Jesus. Even though we now stress more than ever the Jewishness of Jesus, meaning that as a faithful Jew he would share the Jewish hostility toward homosexuality as the actions of idolatrous neighbors. he never specifically spoke against it. Never mind that what he does say about sexual morality is the very opposite of the libertine lifestyle that is so much a part of the gay "community." When we get to the issue, they are "strict constructionists."
16 posted on
05/04/2006 3:30:27 PM PDT by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
What the heck am I doing on this ping list?
I truly do not give a damn if someone is a homo or not.
It ain't my business.
21 posted on
05/04/2006 4:42:38 PM PDT by
Blackirish
(Hillary is angry AND brittle.)
To: DBeers
List? Haven't read the article yet but will.
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Homosexual acts are a sin.
Homosexual urges, like any other temptation, are not.
Since homosexual acts are often acts of passion, they might be less "evil" than other actions that are deliberate choosing of evil.
I have enough problems controlling my temptations to sin than to criticize another who gives in.
However, I do oppose the so called "Gay agenda". But the gay agenda is actually less dangerous than other agendas, such as materialism, immodesty, ignoring poor people, heterosexual promiscuity etc.
29 posted on
05/04/2006 5:59:27 PM PDT by
LadyDoc
(liberals only love politically correct poor people)
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
We all know homosexuality a sin. No disagreement there.
But where I part ways with you and Fred Phelps is when you claim that we should kill them.
Neither one of you are conservative.
And you should change your name. Ann Coulter would call you a kook.
To: Conservative Coulter Fan
No matter what, all the PRO-GAY legalization, all the brainwashing efforts, all the trying to normalize same sex acts.....
IN THE END
SAME SEX ACTS WILL ALWAYS BE A SIN
39 posted on
05/05/2006 8:49:50 AM PDT by
dcnd9
To: ZoeB
Try this:
To not be clear on which gender you are does not establish that you are both. Nor does it prove that anyone is homoexual. There is no such thing as homosexual. There are heterosexuals with sinful, aberrant behavior and desires. There are heterosexuals with physcial abnormalities, some of which can cause them to be confused. The first is far more common than the last, and they are entitled to the only truth that can set them free.
Do you like that any better?
56 posted on
05/06/2006 11:05:15 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson