Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

450th Anniversary of Cranmer's Martyrdom
meam commemorationem ^ | 3/21/2006

Posted on 03/21/2006 12:20:42 PM PST by sionnsar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 03/21/2006 12:20:45 PM PST by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; axegrinder; AnalogReigns; Uriah_lost; Condor 63; Fractal Trader; Zero Sum; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 03/21/2006 12:21:46 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
While I think Cranmer was in error on many points, when it came down to the point he was extraordinarily brave. I do not think he erred out of malice, but in his honest belief.

He also wrote some of the most beautiful English prose ever.

3 posted on 03/21/2006 12:25:36 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Excuse my ignorance but what happened?


4 posted on 03/21/2006 3:41:52 PM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Thomas Cramner, Archbishop of Canterbury, was burned at the stake during the reign of Queen Mary. He was one of the Protestant martyrs during her reign.


5 posted on 03/21/2006 5:43:54 PM PST by Upbeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
After all, the "Church of England" was started by a chap named King Henry VIII of the House of Tudor who wanted to be rid of his wife, Catherine of Aragon, and sought a decree of nullity from the Pope so that he could marry his mistress, Anne Boleyn. The rest, as they say, is history, and very bad history at that. Henry VIII took England out of the Catholic Faith, starting a fierce persecution of Catholics who remained steadfast in their loyalty to Rome and to the Mass of Tradition in 1534 that saw over 72,000 Catholics, nearly three percent of the population of England at the time, slaughtered by the brute force of the State by the time that Henry died of a certain contagious disease in 1547. Monastery and convent lands were seized, under cover of law, you understand, and the properties re-distributed to both reward Henry's political collaborators and to bribe others to be beholden to the Crown at all costs. The poor who had lived good lives as perpetual tenants on these lands were eventually thrown off, creating the conditions for economic injustice and misery that blighted England for centuries thereafter.

Only one bishop, the Bishop of Rochester, Saint John Fisher, opposed King Henry VIII's re-marriage and his declaration to be the supreme head of the Church in England ("as far as was possible). He lost his head in 1535 for his brave defense of Catholic Truth and the primacy of the Successor of Saint Peter. So did the prominent layman, the former Chancellor of the Realm, Saint Thomas More. However, Saint John Fisher was the only bishop out of about one hundred who remained faithful to the point of death. True, about thirty or so remained faithful when Elizabeth I took England out of the Faith for a second time thirty years later. John Fisher, though, was the only bishop who resisted King Henry VIII and who would not let the exigencies of personal expediency nor exaggerated nationalism get in the way of doing his Catholic duty. Cardinals Murphy-O'Connor and O'Brien have followed the easy path of Saint John Fisher's cowardly colleagues, including the infamous Thomas Cranmer.

Free Republic story

Did Thomas Cranmer, patron saint of unhappy husbands, mind the killing of tens of thousands of Catholics so that Henry VIII could get rid of his wife and marry his mistress?

6 posted on 03/21/2006 7:01:57 PM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TR Jeffersonian

ping


7 posted on 03/22/2006 5:39:04 AM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robertsll
"Did Thomas Cranmer, patron saint of unhappy husbands, mind the killing of tens of thousands of Catholics so that Henry VIII could get rid of his wife and marry his mistress?"
__________________________________

Why is it that RC's feel so compelled to interject their view of events? I can't help but notice that the RC's never will admit to their church's participation in atrocities.
8 posted on 03/22/2006 6:42:47 AM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Why is it that RC's feel so compelled to interject their view of events?

Many RC's are fond of stating their belief that the Reformation (in Great Britain, at least, if not Europe) only came about so that Henry VIII could get a divorce.

Gets old after awhile. I'd say Cranmer showed at the end that his faith did mean something to him when he plunged the hand that had signed his recantation into the flames.

9 posted on 03/22/2006 10:20:46 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (Meadows Place, TX-"Tom DeLay Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
Many RC's are fond of stating their belief...[the Anglican split] came about so that Henry VIII could get a divorce.

That was the origin of the whole mess in England.

What? You think if the pope gave into Henry VIII's ("defender of the faith") demands, Henry VIII would have still split from the Catholic Church?

10 posted on 03/22/2006 10:34:27 AM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
I can't help but notice that the RC's never will admit to their church's participation in atrocities.

There were (of course) atrocities committed by Catholics throughout the ages.

Today, we have Kennedy, Kerry, Durbin, et al.

11 posted on 03/22/2006 10:36:56 AM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robertsll
Maybe not, but it does not change the fact that a lot of Protestant martyrs (like Cranmer) went to their deaths not caring about Henry VIII, his wives, heirs, etc. The Reformation still happened, and was a real thing that grew bigger than Henry VII's marital problems.

I saw a recent documentary that suggested that Henry VII, late in life, was thinking of returning to Catholicism. His last wife was almsot executed for being too Protestant. Had Henry returned to Catholicism, do you think the rest of the Protestants in England would have done so too?

Whatever started the Reformation in England, it eventually had a life and momentum of its own. The constant assertion to say that "it only came about because of the divorce" is merely an attempt to belittle the movement, IMO.

12 posted on 03/22/2006 10:50:18 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (Meadows Place, TX-"Tom DeLay Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
I saw a recent documentary that suggested that Henry VII, late in life, was thinking of returning to Catholicism. His last wife was almsot executed for being too Protestant. Had Henry returned to Catholicism, do you think the rest of the Protestants in England would have done so too?

Henry VIII had opened the door to ultra-nationalism and anti-papist sentiment. There was no going back to the ways things were.

Whatever started the Reformation in England, it eventually had a life and momentum of its own. The constant assertion to say that "it only came about because of the divorce" is merely an attempt to belittle the movement, IMO.

So you are telling me the Reformation in England did not have its origins in King Henry VIII declaring himself head of the Church of England so that he could divorce his wife?

13 posted on 03/22/2006 11:01:15 AM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
Maybe not, but it does not change the fact that a lot of Protestant martyrs (like Cranmer) went to their deaths not caring about Henry VIII, his wives, heirs, etc.

Cranmer opposed true presence and supported the destruction of statues and holy images (both polar opposite views of Anglicans today). The person responsible for his "martyrdom" was the same person he bastardized. Cranmer gave support and legitimacy to many of Henry VIII's public actions, including some barbaric activities.

Like I said, there are some bad Catholics today, among them bishops, priest, and members of the laity. If they were killed for their disturbed beliefs and actions, I would be appalled, mourn their deaths and pray for their souls. I would not call them martyrs.

14 posted on 03/22/2006 11:32:59 AM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Henry VIII's dispute with the Vatican over his marriage to Catherine of Aragon provided an opportunity for the reform movement to develop and emerge out into the open. It would have come without the dispute but may not have been successful. The reign of Queen Mary was comparably short so while it was brutal toward those who adopted the reformed faith, Cranmer, Ridley and Latimmer for instance, it effectively ended with her death. On the other hand Catholic priests were drawn and quartered when caught during the 16th and 17th centuries. The political machinations of the Catholic Mary queen of Scots to take the throne of Elizabeth I didn't help. I have wondered about the House of Norfolk. The Duke of Norfolk is the leading Catholic layman in the UK. The family remained Catholic during the reformation . It is sad to this Evangelical to see the present day Anglican/Episcopel church to be at best quasi-Christian. I find that I have more in common with my Catholic brothers -in-Christ than with many other Protestants.


15 posted on 03/22/2006 11:33:49 AM PST by Upbeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Upbeat
"Henry VIII's dispute with the Vatican over his marriage to Catherine of Aragon provided an opportunity for the reform movement to develop and emerge out into the open."
_____________________

Wasn't Catherine a relative of the King of France? If Henry VIII had a heir by her wasn't he concerned about the independent sovereignty of England.

BTW, I understand your feelings about the Episcopal Church today. I was raised an Episcopalian, but as I read SCRIPTURE and entered into a personal relationship with JESUS CHRIST I choose to become a Baptist.
16 posted on 03/22/2006 11:44:04 AM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Wasn't Catherine a relative of the King of France? If Henry VIII had a heir by her wasn't he concerned about the independent sovereignty of England.

The answer is no to both parts of your question.

17 posted on 03/22/2006 11:50:09 AM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Robertsll

"The answer is no to both parts of your question."
_____________________________

Actually, I'm pretty sure the answer is yes. Have you ever asked WHY did Henry VIII want to end his marriage. He was King he could have had any number of affairs and nobody would have said a thing.


18 posted on 03/22/2006 11:54:20 AM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I'm fairly certain that Catherine was the daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain. If I'm wrong someone will correct me. I believe the only heir by this wife was Mary,
who became queen.

We have worshiping with us a former Episcopalian who left his church over the gay bishop. Btw, one of my sons is a Baptist.



19 posted on 03/22/2006 11:55:37 AM PST by Upbeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Actually, I'm pretty sure the answer is yes.

I know the answer is no. Catherine was from Spain, not France.

Have you ever asked WHY did Henry VIII want to end his marriage.

It is explain when you learn about it in history classes. Henry VIII wanted male heirs. Catherine, his wife, was older than him and had only provided him a daughter (and a couple miscarriages, one of which was a boy).

When she approached menopause, Henry VIII sought a male heir by other means.

The strange part about all this was the fact that after many wives Henry VIII ended up with no grandchildren by male heirs. All of his male heirs died young and childless.

20 posted on 03/22/2006 12:07:09 PM PST by Robertsll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson