Posted on 01/12/2006 7:42:57 AM PST by Alouette
Proposed ‘rehabilitation’ of the man who was paid 30 pieces of silver to identify Jesus to Roman soldiers in the Garden of Gethsemane, comes on the ground that he was not deliberately evil, but was just ‘fulfilling his part in God’s plan, the London Times reports
Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus with a kiss, is to be given a makeover by Vatican scholars, according to the London Times.
The proposed “rehabilitation” of the man who was paid 30 pieces of silver to identify Jesus to Roman soldiers in the Garden of Gethsemane, comes on the ground that he was not deliberately evil, but was just “fulfilling his part in God’s plan,” the London Times said.
Christians have traditionally blamed Judas for aiding and abetting the Crucifixion, and his name is synonymous with treachery. According to St Luke, Judas was “possessed by Satan.”
According to the London Times, a campaign led by Monsignor Walter Brandmuller, head of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Science, is aimed at persuading believers to look kindly at a man reviled for 2,000 years.
Mgr Brandmuller told fellow scholars it was time for a “re-reading” of the Judas story. He is supported by Vittorio Messori, a prominent Catholic writer close to both Pope Benedict XVI and the late John Paul II.
Signor Messori said that the rehabilitation of Judas would “resolve the problem of an apparent lack of mercy by Jesus toward one of his closest collaborators.”
He told La Stampa that there was a Christian tradition that held that Judas was forgiven by Jesus and ordered to purify himself with “spiritual exercises” in the desert.
'Judas portrayed with a hooked nose'
In scholarly circles, it has long been unfashionable to demonize Judas and Catholics in Britain are likely to welcome Judas’ rehabilitation.
The London Times quoted Father Allen Morris, Christian Life and Worship secretary for the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales, as saying, “If Christ died for all — is it possible that Judas too was redeemed through the Master he betrayed?”
The “rehabilitation” of Judas could help the Pope’s drive to improve Christian-Jewish relations, which he has made a priority of his pontificate.
Some Bible experts say Judas was “a victim of a theological libel which helped to create anti Semitism” by forming an image of him as a “sinister villain” prepared to betray for money.
In many medieval plays and paintings Judas is portrayed with a hooked nose and exaggerated Semitic features. In Dante’s Inferno, Judas is relegated to the lowest pits of Hell, where he is devoured by a three-headed demon.
The move to clear Judas’s name coincides with plans to publish the alleged Gospel of Judas for the first time in English, German and French. Though not written by Judas, it is said to reflect the belief among early Christians — now gaining ground in the Vatican — that in betraying Christ Judas was fulfilling a divine mission, which led to the arrest and Crucifixion of Jesus and hence to man’s salvation, according to the London Times.
'Fell headlong'
Mgr Brandmuller said that he expected “no new historical evidence” from the supposed gospel, which had been excluded from the canon of accepted Scripture.
But it could “serve to reconstruct the events and context of Christ’s teachings as they were seen by the early Christians.” This included that Jesus had always preached “forgiveness for one’s enemies.”
Some Vatican scholars have expressed concern over the reconsideration of Judas. Monsignor Giovanni D’Ercole, a Vatican theologian, said it was “dangerous to re-evaluate Judas and muddy the Gospel accounts by reference to apocryphal writings. This can only create confusion in believers.”
The Gospels tell how Judas later returned the 30 pieces of silver — his “blood money” — and hanged himself, or according to the Acts of the Apostles, “fell headlong and burst open so that all his entrails burst out."
I never said "The rope broke". I said he went and hung himself and his body, neglected and ignored, eventually rotted and came crashing down on its own. When it hit the ground it literally burst open.
I like my theory better. :-)
Judas committed suicide, so even if he repented of his betrayal, he still went to hell.
Sounds like Gnostics are looing for some notoriety! Early "Christians" included all sorts of rag-tag self-appointed belevers in Christ. Is Elaine Pagels behind this? I wouldn't be surprised.
Well, then there is nothing to correct. Gospels are not something you re-negotiate. Judas gave in to evil, plain and simple. The next thing the anti-Christian coalition will try will be to rehabilitate the Jewish High Priest and Pontius Pilate. I guess, they too were "fulfilling God's plan." Someone has been reading Calvin again.
Choked himself? Ha, little naive -- have you tried that. Hint: you pass out and you stop choking yourself....nice try in linguistics.
See post 133. Actually that is a relatively common method of both deliberate and accidental suicide.
So are you in agreement with joesbucks that the scriptures are irreparably contradictory? Do you have no faith whatsoever in the inerrancy of the scripture?
Where does the idea come from than suicide if unforgivable???
Any reason you're acting so aggressively? I don't think it's necessary to call that poster a Satanist.
I do not have a dog in this fight but for someone who keeps insiting that you are humble, contrite etc. you sure do throw around a great many judgemental adjectives at others (" I am humbler than you are, haha ") Frankly, to stress another's alleged hubris and arrogance and then to pretend you are only doing so because of your most contrite attittude is at best vaguely comical. Read your post and think about the contradictions therin.
Extreme denial.
"I recall Jesus saying that it would have been better for Judas had he never been born. I don't really think that means Jesus welcomed him into Heaven."
Yeah, yeah. We all know the scriptural evidence looks bad for Judas. Nonetheless, all the theologians say the evidence does not prove he went to hell (the place of the damned). Logically, the possibility of a lesser punishment is left open. Theolgians are not infallible, but they're not stupid either.
One priest does not the Holy See make.
Don't go calling my church Gnostic...the holes in your sect of Christianity are large enough to drive a truck through.
It would be better for Judas if he had never been born.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.