Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This may be of interest...and interesting to see the reaction when the document comes out.
1 posted on 11/11/2005 5:21:15 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah; NYer

a ping you might be interested in.


2 posted on 11/11/2005 5:22:11 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
"The Church cannot admit to the priesthood those who practice homosexuality, have deeply rooted homosexual tendencies or those who support the so-called 'gay culture,'" the newspaper quoted the document as saying.

Bears much repeating! God bless Benedict XVI!!!

3 posted on 11/11/2005 5:42:27 AM PST by NYer (“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
Reacting to earlier reports that the document would ban even celibate men with gay tendencies, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin of Dublin told the British Catholic newspaper The Tablet last month:

"You don't write off a candidate for the priesthood simply because he is a gay man."

Mmmmmm...nooo...actually....I think you do, Your Excellency.

4 posted on 11/11/2005 5:49:02 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

This seems pretty self explanatory, they might as well be quoting Archbishop Dolan's "Priests for the Third Millenium" where he differentiates between "tendencies" and "lifestyle".

Nothing new here.

What would be new is if he can get the Bishops in the U.S. to actually listen......


5 posted on 11/11/2005 5:51:57 AM PST by Cheverus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

I wonder what qualifies as "deeply rooted homosexual tendencies?" How will this be defined?

Presumably, it's something short of practicing homosexuality but more than passing gay fancies.


7 posted on 11/11/2005 5:54:00 AM PST by bourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
A new Vatican document will bar from the priesthood practicing homosexuals, men whose gay tendencies are "deeply rooted," or who openly espouse a gay culture, a leading Italian newspaper reported on Friday.

And just when you think things can't get any better...

By several accounts, the document is expected to be short and to the point.

I want to hear the MSM squeal!

9 posted on 11/11/2005 5:55:20 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
Il Giornale of Milan printed what it said were excerpts from the eagerly awaited document, expected to be issued at the end of this month.

I hope this isn't another "trial balloon". We're still several weeks away from the end of the month.

10 posted on 11/11/2005 5:55:23 AM PST by NYer (“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

There is nothing inherently wrong about homosexual feelings--it is the action or acceptance of the action that is wrong. We are all sinners, and homosexuals who lust are no different than heterosexuals who lust--it is the self-control and devotion to God rather than Man that is important. I like where Benedict XVI is going with all this.


12 posted on 11/11/2005 6:25:23 AM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
A new Vatican document will bar from the priesthood practicing homosexuals, men whose gay tendencies are "deeply rooted," or who openly espouse a gay culture, a leading Italian newspaper reported on Friday.

I know what they're saying and so do most reasonable people but there's too much wiggle room here for me.

Rule #1: No poofters!!!

Anything less than this will be interpreted to mean that homosexuals are not ipso facto, ineligible for Holy Orders. Then it will all come down to what the defintion of "deeply rooted" means. We all know how that will be worked around- especially by people like the US episcopacy.

13 posted on 11/11/2005 6:27:10 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

If this is for real, nothing is going to change. It gives the formation directors too many "outs."


14 posted on 11/11/2005 6:34:31 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Sounds good. Can't wait until it is released. Praying that it's as strong as it sounds.


15 posted on 11/11/2005 6:44:48 AM PST by Antoninus (Hillary smiles whenever a Freeper trashes Rick Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
Blahblahblah ....

Reporters, unnamed sources, highly placed officials, excerpts, experts, unidentified accouts ... barf. What a bunch of wankers. The document hasn't been published, you buffoons! When it is, we'll read it (and all about it). Until then, find something else to report on.

16 posted on 11/11/2005 7:07:15 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

wonder how that "openly espouse a gay culture" will be interpreted. it's okay if that do it quietly and behind the scenes? plant maple trees now so you'll have plenty of syrup to go with the waffles.


21 posted on 11/11/2005 7:35:33 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ..

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Looks better and better. The light of dawn may be shining in the east. Nothing like the light of God's truth to cheer and enlighten. Let people who want to reject universal moral principles quit defiling religious institutions and just go hang out - well, find someplace else to hang out.

Or better yet, contact one of the many organizations that help people become free from homosexuality!

Freepmail me and DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.


31 posted on 11/11/2005 9:10:56 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
It would not affect those men who are already priests but only those entering seminaries to prepare for the priesthood.

Told y'all so!

-Theo

35 posted on 11/11/2005 2:42:31 PM PST by Teófilo (Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
A new Vatican document will bar from the priesthood practicing homosexuals, men whose gay tendencies are "deeply rooted," or who openly espouse a gay culture

I dunno. Too many loopholes for me. Practicing homosexuals is a no-brainer. Openly espousing a gay culture? So one can be a homosexual and a priest if one doesn't do gay pride parades? If one espouses behind closed doors?

The Vatican needs to just say, "No homosexual priests" and be done with it.

37 posted on 11/11/2005 4:14:55 PM PST by tuesday afternoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson