Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
Sen. Danforth seems to have gone 'round the bend. Dad always said he was squirrelly.
This guy calls himself a Christian clergyman, and yet he would participate in a rite that sanctions and promotes and "sanctifies" homosexual activity, which by its very nature is sinful and has always and everywhere been held such in the Christian church? And also, where does this jerk get off claiming that one cannot have a principled opposition to civil same sex marriage and seek a constitutional amendment to prevent activist judges from imposing such without being "gay bashers"?
Danforth is a coward trying to take the middle road. Either that or he's just a loser.
I guess he beleives in an evolving bible as well as an evolving constitution. I think somewhere in the bible it says God does not change. Something about the same yesterday, today and forever. Wonder if he has read that. He is one of those it depends of what the meaning of is is.
This priest also spewed this same nonsense. So, it must be in the Liberal "talking Points Memo." As he had "spoken" or I should say "lectured" us before on the the Holy Bible containing many Old Babylonian Myths, I guess he feels the Old Babylonians were around before the Creation, I never go when he is "speaking."
I spoke to one woman afterwards and she told me what he said and how she thought it was a wonderful "sermon" right after the consecration of a homosexual, to show that the Episcopal Church was understanding of homosoexuals but not going to equate them with married men and women.
My response to her was, "He must be a member of the Church of Laodicea. So tell me, you would have no qualms about the church blessing the relationship of your husband and his mistress?"
She said, "Oh,that's silly."
I told her to read Exodus and Romans and then tell me how silly it sounded to her then.
A bit like blessing an adulterous affair between a married man and his mistress.
But he is not a follower of the Christ, Y'shua
b'shem Y'shua