[bornacatholic]

And if you vote like you express your view, you continue to condom to death an extra 750,000 a year in the name of your hoity toity principles.

*look, nobody is buying your nonsense. So, you up the ante and charge with "condemning to death" one with consistent pro-life principles, which you label "hoity toity".

That is both illogical and nasty.

I think Ronaldus Magnus has you pinned

[A CA Guy]

If you all are pushing for no abortion except for rape, incest and the possible death issues of the mother in birth as a step toward the abolishment of no abortion, we have NO disagreement.

The ones that poo poo the above and insist on 100% ONLY (which I do believe exists in good numbers), should go for the other part first and fight for the rest later as we can. That was the nature and context of that statement.

We agree from what I see that it would be stupid to not save what we can first and to fight for the rest as we can also.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

Lately I've noticed an increase in these "seminar caller" type posters who use false pretenses to slander conservative principles. These liberals pretend to be conservatives in order to have more credibility in their attacks on real conservative than they would if they were honest about their liberal bias. They are usually easy to identify by their tendency to repeatedly misstate conservative positions and then attack conservatives over the fault they themselves just fabricated. They also refuse to respond to any rebuttals or corrections of their false characterizations. This one was easy to identify because he was dumb enough to talk about conservatives as "you" and "they" while simultaneously claiming to be a "true conservative" himself as he attacked something he made up about conservatives.