Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it time to ordain married men to the Catholic priesthood?
Vivificat! - A Catholic Blog of Commentary and Opinion ^ | 7 April 2005 | Teófilo

Posted on 04/07/2005 5:00:46 AM PDT by Teófilo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last
To: cyborg

Sorry, didn't realize you were a girl--or is that a pic of you, Ariel?


81 posted on 04/07/2005 8:12:26 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Sorry 'bout the date. Doesn't change the arguement.
Technically, that feudal holdings don't belong to the feudal lord; they belong the king. Nevertheless, the lord's son inherits it, or else there is trouble. The same thing applied to the holdings of the Roman Church. In many ways it was another feudal kingdom, just more geographically dispersed.

Personally, I think priests SHOULD be married. But what do I know - I'm just a Protestant.
82 posted on 04/07/2005 8:22:20 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pa mom
What is so wrong with sex within marriage that makes God require priests to forgo it?

God doesn't require it.

Those who insist that God requires it make God look very confused:

He calls married men to be priests in the Eastern Rite, but only single men in the Latin Rite.

Oh, and He calls some Protestant married men to the priesthood in the Latin Rite after they convert, but He doesn't call any Catholic married men to the priesthood in the Latin Rite.

Mandatory celibacy is a Church discipline and can be changed at any time.

83 posted on 04/07/2005 8:36:52 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo

**Is it time to ordain married men to the Catholic priesthood?**

No


84 posted on 04/07/2005 8:37:12 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
**Is it time to ordain married men to the Catholic priesthood?**

No

Amen.

85 posted on 04/07/2005 8:38:33 AM PDT by murphE (Never miss an opportunity to kiss the hand of a holy priest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo
Pope Defends Clergy Celibacy Order
Has the Time Come to Consider Making Celibacy Truly Optional In the Western Church?
Catholic Scandals: A Crisis for Celibacy?
Celibacy of the priesthood is a church strength, not a liability
Celibacy s history of power and money

Pope: Priests Must Stay Celibate
Giving Thanks for the Good Shepherds ( A Defense of Priestly Celibacy)
Don't end celibacy for priests
The celibate superhero
Priestly Celibacy And Its Roots In Christ

How to Refute Arguments Against Priestly Celibacy
Priestly Celibacy Reflects Who - and Whose - We Are[Father George W.Rutler]
Celibacy
Tracing the Glorious Origins of Celibacy
God’s call to celibacy for the sake of His Kingdom - by Card. George

Vatican Says Celibacy Rule Nonnegotiable
Bishop Attacks Move to End Celibacy
A response to Fr. Joseph Wilson's defense of mandatory celibacy
The gift of Priestly celibacy as a sign of the charity of Christ, by Mother Teresa of Calcutta
Archbishop Dolan:"We Need to Be Renewing Our Pledge to Celibacy, Not Questioning It"

Celibacy is gift cherished by church
Celibacy Will Save the Priesthood
Celibacy Defended by EWTN's Fr. Levis
Call To Action: Dump Celibacy
The (Catholic) Church Has Always Prospered When Celibacy Is Honored

John Paul II Hails "Inestimable Value" of Priestly Celibacy
For Priests, Celibacy Is Not the Problem
Fr. Shannon Collins Discusses Celibacy
5 Arguments Against (Catholic) Priestly Celibacy and How to Refute Them
Why A Married Priesthood Won't Remedy the Priest Shortage

New Vatican Document on Homosexuality and the Priesthood Coming Before Fall 2005
Catholic priests demand the right to marry
Catholic priests urge Church to reconsider celibacy rules
Alternative Priests´ Council Hits Back on Mandatory Celibacy
Married Priests? The English Experience

Saying Yes to God: a Look into Vocations
New Vatican Document to Eliminate 1961 Papal Ban on Ordaining Homosexuals
Saying Yes to God: a Look into Vocations

Is it time to ordain married men to the Catholic priesthood?

86 posted on 04/07/2005 8:39:00 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chgomac
Are you saying that women should be allowed to distribute Communion only if extraordinary circumstances were present?

I'm saying that any layman (man or woman) is allowed to distribute Communion only if extraordinary circumstances are present.

This has been repeatedly noted by the Curia, but is routinely ignored, especially in the U.S.

Most recently, it was strongly reiterated in Redemptionis Sacramentum.

[88.] The faithful should normally receive sacramental Communion of the Eucharist during Mass itself, at the moment laid down by the rite of celebration, that is to say, just after the Priest celebrant's Communion.[172] It is the Priest celebrant's responsibility to minister Communion, perhaps assisted by other Priests or Deacons; and he should not resume the Mass until after the Communion of the faithful is concluded. Only when there is a necessity may extraordinary ministers assist the Priest celebrant in accordance with the norm of law.[173]

[151.] Only out of true necessity is there to be recourse to the assistance of extraordinary ministers in the celebration of the Liturgy. Such recourse is not intended for the sake of a fuller participation of the laity but rather, by its very nature, is supplementary and provisional.[252] Furthermore, when recourse is had out of necessity to the functions of extraordinary ministers, special urgent prayers of intercession should be multiplied that the Lord may soon send a Priest for the service of the community and raise up an abundance of vocations to sacred Orders.[253]

[158.] Indeed, the extraordinary minister of Holy Communion may administer Communion only when the Priest and Deacon are lacking, when the Priest is prevented by weakness or advanced age or some other genuine reason, or when the number of faithful coming to Communion is so great that the very celebration of Mass would be unduly prolonged.[259] This, however, is to be understood in such a way that a brief prolongation, considering the circumstances and culture of the place, is not at all a sufficient reason.

87 posted on 04/07/2005 9:06:09 AM PDT by B Knotts (Ioannes Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

ping


88 posted on 04/07/2005 9:07:19 AM PDT by biblewonk ("well I was told that I could listen to the radio as long as I kept it at a reasonable volume and...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The FSSP won't allow their priests to concelebrate with the bishop or other priests for fear of being "contaminated" by the Novus Ordo.

I don't think this is accurate. Wasn't there a big stink over this issue being forced on the FSSP a while back?

Regardless, even if true, it is not a legitimate reason to suppress the order, as long as they regard the Missa Normativa as valid.

89 posted on 04/07/2005 9:16:16 AM PDT by B Knotts (Ioannes Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Thanks. I'm a historian, so naturally look at things from that perspective. I'm also trying to delve more deeply in to my Catholic faith, so any and all info is helpful.

I hate to sound like Dan Brown, but there does seem to be an awful lot of anti-female bias historically in the Church (as elsewhere). How much of the Church's teachings (as the oldest Christian church) come from historical biases and cultural norms of previous eras versus actual scripture? That's rhetorical, not looking to put you on the spot!


90 posted on 04/07/2005 9:17:53 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: cyborg
I don't want homos OR married priests in the Church. I could care less what they think especially since their sexual lust is what is motivating them

By that standard only eunuchs should be priests. All physically normal males have a very powerful sexual impulse. All homo priests are constantly tempted to go for the boys, and all abstinent hetero priests are constantly tempted to go for the young women; there is no third option. The LEAST lustful priest would be the one who has a lawful outlet for his sex drive, namely, marriage.

Besides, look at history: ordaining married priests worked just fine for 1000 years.

92 posted on 04/07/2005 9:30:38 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pa mom
It did it again. The word keeps getting deleted from my posts!

Huh?
93 posted on 04/07/2005 9:32:14 AM PDT by BJClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

Oh, man. More evidence to convince me that the Pharisees' rules and regs must have paled in comparison.


94 posted on 04/07/2005 9:36:41 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: pa mom; sinkspur; B Knotts
What is so wrong with sex within marriage that makes God require priests to forgo it?

He doesn't. According to SCRIPTURE, sex is REQUIRED for married couples. "Do not deny each other...", etc. (1st Corinth 7.) No exception is made for priests.

95 posted on 04/07/2005 9:38:52 AM PDT by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer; biblewonk
That's really nice. Come on to a Catholic thread and call us "Pharisees."

Would you appreciate it if we Catholics came on to Protestant threads and called you "heretics," or something similar?

96 posted on 04/07/2005 9:39:29 AM PDT by B Knotts (Ioannes Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng; cyborg
By that standard only eunuchs should be priests.

Exactly, Our Lord's standard.

"For there are eunuchs, who were born so from their mother's womb: and there are eunuchs, who were made so by men: and there are eunuchs, who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven. He that can take, let him take it."
Matthew 19.12

97 posted on 04/07/2005 9:41:27 AM PDT by murphE (Never miss an opportunity to kiss the hand of a holy priest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: BJClinton

For some reason the word "sex", though typed in, did not appear when posted!


99 posted on 04/07/2005 9:43:00 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

I know, I just wanted to put a pentagram in there to mess with ya!


100 posted on 04/07/2005 9:44:06 AM PDT by BJClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson