I mean, I think a healthy theological discussion as much as anyone, but the man acutally has a graph purporting to illustrate the Consciousnesses of Man and God (which looks like it was done on the Paint program, btw). The article not only seems pretentious and overanalytical, it also smells of quakery.
hmm... well, besides that graphic, does anything else bother you about it? What is quakeryish about it? You seem to be pulling the classic liberal ploy of questioning intentions. :) Keep in mind the disclaimer says:
Disclaimer: This paper reflects only ideas and theories, not necessarily my personal opinion, and is only intended to encourage discussion and thought. It is not an attempt to proselytize, criticize, or demean any faith or belief.