hmm... well, besides that graphic, does anything else bother you about it? What is quakeryish about it? You seem to be pulling the classic liberal ploy of questioning intentions. :) Keep in mind the disclaimer says:
Disclaimer: This paper reflects only ideas and theories, not necessarily my personal opinion, and is only intended to encourage discussion and thought. It is not an attempt to proselytize, criticize, or demean any faith or belief.
I'm not trying to say it's trying to demean anyone's faith or proselytizing. Maybe I'm too stupid or lazy, I can't even figure out what the heck it's trying to argue! But all the charts and high-falutin pseudo-scientific jargon just make it seem sort of bogus. It's like he's trying to mathematize metaphysics.
The answer to life, the universe, and everything is 42.