Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer; kstewskis
You know I figured out how to live with the awful new chairman,Skylstad and why it may even be a blessing that one of the conservative orthodox Bishops did not prevail But this makes me sick and furious.

The selected candidates were Rigali and Vigneron. Both very good. Then someone nominated Traoutman from the floor. I want to know who that vermin was,does anyone know?

Furthermore,they had big problems withthe electronic balloting so I don't believe what they are reporting on that election. Additionally,who is allowed to vote and on what issues. Someone noted that our little xbishop was there. Knowing his established modus operandi,I would bet the little conniving deceiver found some way to cast a ballot.

Once I find out who nominated him I think I have a plan. Please,does anybody know? Help!!

13 posted on 11/16/2004 2:11:50 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: saradippity

I have a possibly related, but maybe even better question: what were Egan and Mahoney up to? How did they vote on things? Did they speak? Nominate......or orchestrate things behind the scenes?

Remember: these are two of Bernadin boys......cut from the same cloth as their masters.....both the earthly and unearthly ones!


17 posted on 11/16/2004 2:27:38 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux! St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: saradippity; NYer; ninenot
Someone noted that our little xbishop was there. Knowing his established modus operandi,I would bet the little conniving deceiver found some way to cast a ballot.

That was me. I can't believe this crap. If there ever is a reason to involk St. Michael's protection for our Church, now is the time.

Watching the press conference on EWTN (rerun). Interesting news:

Who is Kathleen McChesney? Does she have something to do with the child protection advisement in the USCCB? She is stepping down, I understand.

What burns me is that there is "free" time where the bishops discuss policy where there are no cameras watching them. They say "this is where we get the most done." Dirtly little poof-twits are doing their damage here, where they can't be watched!

The Holy See though, best be holding their light feet to the fire as their ruling was on them for 2002.

On a side note, another soldier from the legion liturgical abuse, Fr. Fruitcake...er...Fr. Fraggomeni... is coming back to St. Andrew's in January. Might be a good night to hold a rosary outside the church doors.

67 posted on 11/16/2004 8:20:00 PM PST by kstewskis (Political correctness is intellectual terrorism.......M Gibson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: saradippity; All
INTERESTING!

There was a "voting glitch" during the electonic vote between Trautman, Rigali, and Venerant (sp). The first votes where automatically invalid, because of of "blinking lights."

They used a WRITE IN system for chossing the bishop for this office (liturgy).

For the next vote for Chairman of Marraige and family life, the electronic vote system magically worked again!

Now something REALLY stinks!

68 posted on 11/16/2004 8:43:48 PM PST by kstewskis (Political correctness is intellectual terrorism.......M Gibson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson