Posted on 11/10/2004 3:39:43 PM PST by hiho hiho
An Episcopal minister in my town just wrote an op-ed piece stating that "Jesus was crucified by mistake, he was supposed to live hear a time more to heal the world". I would advise all christians to flee the Episcopal church asap.
Bennison's just another nutty bishop. Episcopalians should have seen this coming. They probably did but, like most churches, have a culture of denial, don't rock the boat and so forth. Episcopalian parish life is essentially sedate and no one wants to be the one to speak out. The Vestry must have agonized quite a bit before trying to expel the tree-huggers.
This is so very sad, because the Anglican liturgy is so rich and sublimely beautiful, there is no need for "alternatives."
Who said that there are scismatic elements confusing Episcopal parisioners? I am a Lutheran, and if a Lutheran pastor were found to be "dabbling" in Aztec heart sacrifice, well... can we be so intolerant as to circumscribe his latitude in his personal spirtual exploration? ... er, yeah.
I am surprised that the Book of Common Prayer does not burn him when he holds it.
A doctrine of demons has made its way into this Church.
The road to hell is paved with "exploratory thinking"
and "theological experimentation".
Today it means anything goes. It has become a mixing bowl of ever belief from any religion. Let's put in a cup of Zen Buddhism, half a cup of Hinduism, a pound of Sufism, and a bunch of Wiccan coarsely chopped. Optional seasoning: a quarter teaspoon of Christianity.
Pull the plug on it, the body's just hanging around, like Arafat's.
Episcopalean, Anglican, English, Tudor, King Arthur,wiccan, druid (is there a direct line connection here, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm)
Another sign of the times. Quix, if we look carefully the signs appear everyday. :)
AMEN! From you keyboard to God's ear....
you=your. Sorry.
This Bishop Bennison is a complete loony. The only reason I don't call him a fool, is because of the Biblical injunction against that; so I am hoping that calling him a complete loony will pass muster with higher authority.
This sad excuse for a bishop thinks of himself as open-minded, and then denigrates those who object to pagans in the priesthood. He allows the sanctuary to be descecrated with pagan ceremonies, and belittles the sacrements by equating them with pagan "alternative liturgies."
I wonder who the people are who attend church and give offerings where Wiccans are in charge. People in that part of Pennsylvania should make sure that everyone in those churches knows what is going on. Members of those parishes should flee, and find a good Anglican church, even if they must travel 80 miles to get to services.
Another alternative is to talk to the nearest Roman Catholic priest, and ask if you can be accepted at communion there. Some (perhaps most) will allow you, because Anglican baptism and orders are considered "irregular." but not invalid in the RC Church. The services are essentially the same, and a good Anglican is at least as good a Catholic as some of these CINO politicians who support abortion. I have never found anything wrong with a RC service -- nothing contrary to my traditions and beliefs -- and have never been turned away.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail me if you want on or off this list.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
My apologies for the delayed ping -- I have been traveling and only this morning got back to FR.
Regarding the posted article, David Virtue had this to say also:
Many of our regular readers know of the scandal, heresey and paganism that flows from the Diocesan office and revisionist parishes of the Diocese of Pennsylvania.
VirtueOnline has been at the leading edge of the charge in exposing these issues and telling the inside story on this extermely revisionist Diocese and it's [sic] leader Charles Bennison.
Use the following URL to see a comprehensive list of stories on this topic that are available on VirtueOnline.
http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/search.php?query=PENNSYLVANIA%3A&mid=4&action=showall&andor=AND
Also included in this list of stories are tales of the orthodox remnant of believers in this Diocese and their struggle against their bishop.
Can. 844 §4. If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.
We received on an emergency basis under this canon until we made our profession of faith and joined the Catholic Church.
Dear docbnj,
"Anglican baptism and orders are considered "irregular." but not invalid in the RC Church..."
All Christian baptisms are considered valid by the Catholic Church, but Anglican orders are generally considered invalid by the Catholic Church.
sitetest
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.