Posted on 10/17/2004 3:32:54 PM PDT by NYer
I don't hate the sedes; I laugh at them. They're ignorant, stupid people.
And you're probably going to vote Kerry?
Uh, no.
I have to laugh at you, too, for thinking JPII will be one of the worst popes ever.
He may, one day, get the name "John Paul the Great." He deserves it.
That is the most assinine statement I've ever read on this forum. Ever.
Or what you just said is. Compare and contrast with every other Pope. Then say what you said, again. Go ahead.
I don't hate the sedes; I laugh at them. They're ignorant, stupid people.
And so you HATE - HATE - HATE. You can be honest. You hate them. Me - I don't.
I have to laugh at you, too, for thinking JPII will be one of the worst popes ever.
You wish to mock and deride, etc. It's a small step from HATE - HATE - HATE. Me, I don't hate YOU. But I do consider you to be very ignorant.
As someone who has voluntarily gone on the record as stating that sevry "is making complete sense" (#49), perhaps you'd like to extend your endorsement to posts #57, #62 and #63?
You're the one who thinks JPII is the worst Pope, ever.
I'll leave it to the lurkers and the Catholics of the world to determine who has the shoe-sized IQ here.
I take it you disagree. So, in all honesty, who do you nominate instead? Let's discuss it.
How bizarre to want to discuss "the worst pope ever." No thanks.
You're the one who keeps complaining. I just continue to reply.
It was post 50. My comment was that nothing that sevry had written indicated to me that he/she had, in your words, "lost lost faith that the Holy Spirit is still working through the Church." There was nothing written in the thread which would indicate that.
It was a pretty straight-forward comment. What don't you like about it?
Better yet, what is it about post 62 and 63 in particular that concerns you?
What you wrote was that "sevry was making complete sense".
Want to extend your wholehearted endorsement to posts #57, 62, 63?
A yes or a no will suffice.
Give me a break. I don't have anything to be wiggling over. My comment was clear.
Apparently you want me to say something in particular. Out with it.
LOL!! You're the nutburger who wants to discuss "the worst pope ever." In fact, it was you who suggested it.
But, I think we've established that your doorbell is missing a ring or two.
LOL!! You're the nutburger
As the late, greatest President of the 20th century would say - there you go . . . . . . well.
Weird.
Yeah, I do.
Here it is again for the third time.
Are you still of the opinion that sevry "is making complete sense" having read posts #57, #62 and #63?
A yes or no answer will suffice.
Yes or no to the endorsement of what in particular, marshmallow?
Do you want my opinion as to whether this pope is the worst pope in history? Is that it?
Weird.
Do you REALLY need me to tell you who that was, and in what situations he would say such things?
Does that sound about right?
In #50 you eagerly butted into a conversation I was having with sevry to inform me and everyone else that "he was making complete sense". Well thanks.
In the light of his subsequent posts, I want to know whether you still have the same eagerness to be his cheerleader?
You voluntarily jumped on his bandwagon. Are you still on it or have you jumped off?
It isn't a hard question. Do the posts which I've enumerated several times still make "complete sense" to you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.