In #50 you eagerly butted into a conversation I was having with sevry to inform me and everyone else that "he was making complete sense". Well thanks.
In the light of his subsequent posts, I want to know whether you still have the same eagerness to be his cheerleader?
You voluntarily jumped on his bandwagon. Are you still on it or have you jumped off?
It isn't a hard question. Do the posts which I've enumerated several times still make "complete sense" to you?
Again, what am I wiggling out of? If you can't even state what it is. State what it is. If you can't deliver, by all means, keep saying wiggle wiggle. It's pretty goofy and get a kick out of it.
"In #50 you eagerly butted into a conversation I was having with sevry to inform me and everyone else that "he was making complete sense"."
I like how you add the embellishment "eagerly". "Butting in" is gratuitous as well, figuring as how this a public forum and all.
"Well thanks."
You're quite welcome. Anytime. Just ask. Heck, you may not even have to.
"In the light of his subsequent posts, I want to know whether you still have the same eagerness to be his cheerleader?"
Well you see, marshmallow, I never propose to be anyone's cheerleader. Not even my own. I suppose I just don't care about things like that. I merely stated that I didn't buy your take on how sevry had lost confidence in the Holy Ghost. I still don't. I think it's a bad judgment call on your part to infer such a thing; it's bad method in conversation.
And at this point, I still see nothing wrong with anything sevry has said.
If you believe something to be wrong with it, then say what it is. If you can't, I'll be trying your "wiggle wiggle" device out right back at you.
"You voluntarily jumped on his bandwagon. Are you still on it or have you jumped off?"
I can't describe the relief I feel and discovering that it wasn't unvoluntary. Could you imagine what it would be like if it were unvoluntary? lol. At any rate, it's not a bandwagon I jumped on, imho. I just read his/her statements, and said hey, I don't see anything objectionable in them.
"It isn't a hard question. Do the posts which I've enumerated several times still make "complete sense" to you?"
I'm going to make you ask me a question about my opinion on a particular topic. You're going to state the question clearly and concisely. Then I'm going to answer the question for you, both clearly, and precisely. What more could you possibly ask for. See, I'm not really into this thing about making assumptions about people. Nor am I into leaning on other people to determine the Catholic Truth for me. Heck, I've got most all the pertinent documents of the Church at my disposal. What more do I need, eh.
Is there some way in which I, or sevry, has stated something which is in error? If so, then please state what it is, and back up your claim.
If not... well then, wiggle wiggly wiggle.