To: pascendi
Apparently you want me to say something in particular. Out with it. Yeah, I do.
Here it is again for the third time.
Are you still of the opinion that sevry "is making complete sense" having read posts #57, #62 and #63?
A yes or no answer will suffice.
To: marshmallow
Yes or no to the endorsement of what in particular, marshmallow?
76 posted on
10/19/2004 8:13:54 PM PDT by
pascendi
(Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
To: marshmallow
Do you want my opinion as to whether this pope is the worst pope in history? Is that it?
77 posted on
10/19/2004 8:15:02 PM PDT by
pascendi
(Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
To: marshmallow
I think I know where you want to go with this. I think you want me to say
"John Paul II is the worst pope in history" because, somehow, you want to make the case that I shouldn't believe sevry to have made any sense from post #50 and working backwards.
Does that sound about right?
79 posted on
10/19/2004 9:44:14 PM PDT by
pascendi
(Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
To: marshmallow
that sevry "is making complete sense" having read posts #57, #62 and #63? I guess the idea that ANYONE would suggest JP II, in the pantheon of Popes, might be considered by those in future as - WORST POPE EVER! - comes as a shock your 'reformed' system. You have no words. You have no . . thoughts. You are sweating, and uncomfortable, and unable to speak?
Is that why you haven't said much, since then?
82 posted on
10/21/2004 1:02:59 AM PDT by
sevry
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson