The Churches of the New Testament Were Taught the Doctrine of Unconditional Election

Landmark Independent Baptist Church ^ | Wayne Camp

[Gamecock]

 

RETURN to Landmark Independent Baptist Church Homepage

The Churches of the New Testament Were Taught the Doctrine of Unconditional Election

by Wayne Camp

The matter can be settled only in the light of the word of God. I call on any reader who doubts that these churches were taught the doctrine of unconditional election to reason with me from the inspired book of God, the inspired book written as holy men of God were born along by the Holy Spirit. That is the final authority.

 The church at Thessalonica was taught that this election was from the beginning and was unto salvation. 2 Thessalonians 2:13 But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. This verse leaves no doubt in the matter. The expression "from the beginning" refers to eternity past, before the foundation of the world. In the first verse of the first chapter of John the eternality of the Word, the second Person of the holy Trinity, is set forth in very similar terms. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. This church was taught that the election dates back to eternity past.

 The verse under consideration also shows they were taught, and no doubt believed, that this election was unto salvation. It was not because God saw they would be saved and therefore chose them. The election had as its purpose that they would be saved. It was the basic reason for their salvation. From the beginning they were chosen unto that salvation.

 They were also taught that one could know he was chosen. 1 Thessalonians 1:4 Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God. God did the electing; they could know it because they had believed the gospel preached by Paul. They could know it because they had turned from idols to worship and serve the living God.

 Another New Testament church, the one at Ephesus, was also taught the doctrine of unconditional election. They were taught that the saved were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world. Ephesians 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love. Several aspects of what they were taught and apparently believed are seen in this verse. It is obvious from this verse that God is the one doing the choosing. John 15:16 Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you. It is equally evident that this election is unconditional. They were chosen that they might be holy and without blame before God, not because he saw they would be holy and without blame. There was nothing in them, they were taught, that caused God to choose them.

 This congregation was also taught that their election by God was from before the foundation of the world. I have heard preachers suggest that our election takes place in time. Some say, "God voted for you, the devil voted against you, and you cast the deciding vote." The problem is twofold. Satan is not a qualified voter or participant in this election that is of grace and unto salvation. And, you were not around to vote when the election took place--before the foundation of the world. How could the creature participate in an election which preceded the foundation of the world?

 Jesus taught the doctrine of election to the first church established on this earth. He taught that those chosen to Christ were given to him. John 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. The reader is encouraged to take a close look at the verse. Notice that these were given to the Son by the Father before they come to him. They come because they were given and not given because they come. Jesus taught this doctrine and related doctrines, as we will see later, to his first church on this earth during his personal ministry. Consider a verse we used earlier. John 15:16 Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you. Does this not indicate that his election of them preceded any choice they might make concerning Christ as Saviour? Again, Jesus said to these same members of that first New Testament church, "If ye were of the world, the world would love his own, but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you" (John 15:19). This election does not refer to election to special service for that election would be out of the church, or out of the saved. This is an election that is out of the world. They were part of the world but Christ had chosen them out of the world to be his people.

 When Ananias was commanded to go to the house of Judas for Saul, who had just been converted on the road to Damascus, Ananias protested because of Paul's reputation as a persecutor. But the Lord taught him something about the doctrine of unconditional election. Acts 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel. All the time Saul was making havoc of the churches, when he stood and approved of the slaying of Stephen, and when he was on his way to Damascus to continue his threatening and slaughter of Christians, he was one of God's elect, a chosen vessel. That election certainly goes back to eternity. Paul was certain that he had already been chosen to salvation and to his great work when he was born. Galatians 1:15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace. He was marked out and set apart from the time of his birth. God did not have to wait for Saul to repent and believe on him before he could choose him. He had done that from the foundation of the world. And, there is not doubt this election was unconditional when you see how Saul lived right up until the time that God apprehended him on the road to Damascus (Philippians 3:12).

Luke, the human writer of the inspired book of Acts wrote that all who believed did so because they were ordained to eternal life. Acts 13:48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed. There is no way to get around the doctrine of unconditional election here. These believed because they were ordained to eternal life; they were not ordained to eternal life because they believed. Luke was taught the doctrine of election by the Lord Jesus Christ and he left it for all New Testament churches to read and believe.

 The church at Rome was taught that this election is purely of grace. Romans 11:4-6 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. 5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. 6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. Since it is of grace, it could not be of works, and must therefore be unconditional. We will explore this further under another head but must mention it from time to time as we continue to show that these first churches on this earth held to the doctrine of unconditional election.

 The church at Rome was further taught that election is the ground of their justification and security. Romans 8:33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. It is obvious from the verses just preceding this that the elect are the one's whom God calls and justifies. Since God justifies his elect, no one can successfully lay a charge against them. They are secure in the keeping of the justifier.

 They were taught that this purpose and grace of God given us in Christ before the foundation of the world was God's purpose according to election. Romans 9:11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;). Again it is obvious that the Roman congregation was instructed in the doctrine of unconditional election. It is not of works. God's purpose of election rests on nothing in man, nothing seen or foreseen. It solidly rests in the power of the great God to call those whom he has chosen. He chose them to salvation; he has the power and calls them to that salvation. He leaves nothing dependent on the whims of unregenerate sinners. He places the success of his great scheme and purpose of the salvation of his elect squarely on his own omnipotent shoulders. What a comfort this must have been to the church at Rome! What a comfort it should be to the Lord's people in 1996!

 The young pastors of those early churches were taught that the primary purpose of the preaching of the gospel is the salvation of the elect. 2 Timothy 2:10 Therefore / endure all things for the elect's sakes, that they may a/so obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory. Paul had endured many things in order to preach the gospel. He explains to Timothy why he would suffer so. It was that the elect might obtain the salvation to which they were chosen. God uses means in the salvation of sinners. In the confession of faith found in The Baptist Way-book there is an excellent article on the doctrine of election. It says, in part, that election "comprehends all the means in connection the end." The end (purpose) of election is the salvation of the elect and comprehended in the election are all the means to that end. 1 Corinthians 1:21 It pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 1 Corinthians 4:15 In Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel. Paul was convinced that it was the pleasure of God to use the preaching of the gospel in the salvation of his elect; he, therefore, was willing to endure much hardship to preach the gospel so that the elect would obtain salvation. In doing this he clearly set forth the doctrine of election to the young pastor, Timothy.

"We believe that election is the eternal purpose of God, according to which he graciously regenerates, sanctifies, and saves sinners," says Article IX in The Baptist Waybook. And, Paul refers to that eternal purpose of God in his second letter to young Timothy. 2 Timothy 1:8-9 Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Lard, nor of me his prisoner but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the gospel according to the power of God; 9 Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began. Paul taught this pastor that our salvation is according to the purpose and grace of God given us in Christ Jesus before the world began. He dates this back into eternity. He declares that is without regard to anything in us, but is according to God's own purpose and grace. He taught this young preacher unconditional, eternal election to salvation.

 Paul also advanced the doctrine of election in his letter to another New Testament church pastor by the name of Titus. Titus 1:1 Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness. This verse indicates that there is a faith given to the elect that is not given to other people. We know that faith that believes to the saving of the soul is a gift of God (Phil. 1:29). Since all men do not have faith, and God gives that faith necessary to lay hold of Christ, it is apparent that it is the faith of God's elect and is given only to the elect. Otherwise, why specify it as the faith of God's elect? But, my point in this message is that this young pastor of a New Testament church was taught that there is an election that results in God giving a special faith to the elect that results in their obtaining the salvation to which they were chosen before the foundation of the world.

 These early Christians in these New Testament churches were encouraged to make certain they were of God's elect. As I have previously shown, this is something they were taught they could know. 1 Thessalonians 1:4 Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God. They were taught that this knowledge of their election of God is something they should give diligence to ascertain. 2 Peter 1:10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall.

There are many other Scriptures which abundantly show that these early churches of New Testament times were well instructed in the great doctrine of God's sovereign election. As a matter of fact I have hardly scratched the surface. As I have prepared this I have before me a 25 page outline on the doctrine that includes many other verses of Scripture which I could have cited. But these should suffice to establish the fact they were taught and did believe this wonderful doctrine. That is the purpose and scope of this message. May God be pleased to add his blessings to his word.

---

RETURN to Landmark Independent Baptist Church Homepage

[Gamecock]

Many of the verses that we of the Reformed Faith hold as truth all wrapped up into one article.

IMHO, well done.

[Gamecock]

Ping

[HarleyD]

Interesting article. This is the basic concept that for years I never understood. Once a person understands that God does the choosing, then the rest of the TULIP falls into place. I wonder if this is a Reformed Baptist minister?

Another interesting verse I read today was:

"All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out." John 6:36

Quite frankly I don't know how one could interpret the above verse except to read it exactly as written-the Father gives us to our Lord Jesus, we WILL go to Him, and our Lord Jesus will keep us. It's like Dr. E statement, "If God wanted all men to be saved, then all men would be saved."

BTW-Welcome back. The GRPL has undergone much tribulation with the banning of Dr. Steve and the suspension of a host of others. I feel like Elijah in saying, "I alone am left." but Dr. E, Rnmomof7, and others are around. We need your support.

[BibChr]

One of the best crisp statements was my pastor's, in a sermon on Ephesians 1. He explained what the word "election" means (pick, choose, select), and then laid out the idea that God sort of picks everyone, but only those who pick Him out of free will are really elect unto salvation.

"That's not election!" he said. "That's co-signing!"

Dan

[Ex-Episcopalian]

Thank you for a very good post.

[xzins]

They were certainly taught election.

I don't recall the expression "unconditional election" coming up in the bible. I'm open to correction if you do have such a passage. I've not found at all the word "unconditional" in the major translations that I've checked.

Therefore, "election" is a bible doctrine, and there are a few different interpretations of it.

"Unconditional election" would be a denominational teaching of a particular group of Christians, and it is one of the explanations of election, but it is not necessarily the correct interpretation.

[fishtank]

To all.

Good post.

The doctrine of election is certainly foundational - everything falls into place after that acceptance by faith of God's sovereignty.

Recently, whe the discussion of inclusivism vs exclusivism (Or: If someone does not know the Name of Jesus, can they be saved?) came up, the Open Theology of Clark Pinnock was part and parcel of the so-called "inclusivist" movement which says that a person can be saved through general revelation. (This is an idea I reject.)

[HarleyD]

Great thought. Consider this statement:

"You did not choose Me but I chose you, and appointed you that you would go and bear fruit, and that your fruit would remain, so that whatever you ask of the Father in My name He may give to you." John 15:16

or

"If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you." John 15:19

I could just imagine John or Peter saying, "Well, technically you didn't chose us, we responded to your call."

[HarleyD]

"...which says that a person can be saved through general revelation."

This is the slippery slope of rejection of a sovereign God who is in control. The natural conclusion of this theology is that it leads to saying people can believe in God in different ways (Allah, Buddha, etc.).

[Starwind]

Election and salvation are distinct. What God desires from man (whose salvation is conditioned on man's choice to believe and receive) is not the same as God's predestination for His elect (which is sovereign and unconditional), a subset of all men. God desires that all be saved, but predestines only some in fact to salvation. God's desire toward all men, is different from His Election of some.

[Sloth]

Mark me down as a believer in co-signing, then.

[HarleyD]

"God desires that all be saved, but predestines only some in fact to salvation. God's desire toward all men, is different from His Election of some."

Good point.

[Revelation 911]

the Open Theology of Clark Pinnock was part and parcel of the so-called "inclusivist" movement which says that a person can be saved through general revelation. (This is an idea I reject.)

Pre Christ or Post Christ ? - I'd agree with you, post Christ

[BibChr]

Mark me down as a believer in co-signing, then.

So then there's your religion, in which you share the credit with God...

...and there's Biblical Christianity, in which He alone receives the glory for the salvation of His children (Jonah 2:9; Ephesians 1:6, 10, 12, etc.).

Dan

[rwfromkansas]

Amen.

[A.J.Armitage]

The election of Jacob over Esau was certainly unconditional, because Romans 9 says "For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth." (This was quoted in the article.)

If you would make unconditional election a mere denominational interpretation because the word "unconditional" doesn't appear in Scripture, do you do the same to the doctrine of the Trinity?

[Sloth]

So then there's your religion, in which you share the credit with God...

...and there's Biblical Christianity, in which He alone receives the glory for the salvation of His children (Jonah 2:9; Ephesians 1:6, 10, 12, etc.).

There's Biblical Christianity, where men ask "what shall we do?" and men of God answer "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins."

Then there's your religion, where they presumably answer "Nothing. Just hope you're one of the people God picks."

[BibChr]

How embarrassing for you. You clearly know absolutely not the first thing about Biblical Christianity / Calvinism.

Normally, one would take that as a clue to shut up until he learns something.

Here in the RF of FR, it means to post more and more and more....

Dan

[Sloth]

So then there's your religion, in which you share the credit with God...

Yet, you didn't let your own ignorance stop you from posting the presumptuous slander above.

[BibChr]

No, I know that system well. Used to hold it. You said something untrue about the Biblical position; I said something unwelcome about yours. There's a difference.

If the ingredient that results in your salvation and distinguishes you from the lost originates in you, then God must share the glory with you. Undeniable, and just as simple as that.

If you lack the honesty to admit it, that's quite on you. Sloth.

Dan