[Antoninus]

Integrity.

A subject you know little about, I fear.

He accused seminary authorities of laxities in admissions policies. Should he not allow them to explain themselves, or justify themselves?

If I remember correctly, according to Rose, he did contact many of them, but none or not many would speak to him on the record.

But the fact that you would attack Rose is not surprising. You were attacking him as a liar before you even read the book.

[sinkspur]

If I remember correctly, according to Rose, he did contact many of them, but none or not many would speak to him on the record.

Not true. He contacted no seminary rector; he admitted it.

I never called Rose a "liar."

Why would a Catholic author silence a priest-critic by threatening to sue his bishop?