Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Price Of My Soul’s Salvation
The Wanderer ^ | May 13, 2004 | Fr. Joseph F. Wilson

Posted on 05/10/2004 9:03:32 PM PDT by Maximilian

The Price Of My Soul’s Salvation

By FR. JOSEPH F. WILSON

Through the open door could be heard the tinkling of the sacring bell; Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament was being brought to the cell, and from his deathbed Thomas Aquinas called out joyfully, "I receive thee, Price of my soul’s salvation! All my prayer, my study, my work hath been in service of thee!"

After the feast day Mass they apologized to the holy Cure d’Ars, St John Vianney; a choir anthem had been unexpectedly long, and had delayed him so that he was left standing at the altar, holding the sacred Host over the chalice, waiting to complete the Canon of the Mass. But he "did not find the time long. A foolish thought came to me, and I looked at Him, and I said, ‘If I knew that I would have the misfortune to lose you for all eternity, then now, while I hold you in my hand, I should never let you go’."

It was the day after her First Holy Communion, and the little girl had gone to Holy Mass and Communion with her godmother, who could not resist prying, and asked her little protégé what she had said to Jesus in her lengthy, obviously fervent thanksgiving after Communion. "I thanked Him for coming; I asked Him to come again. I asked Him to keep me good, so that I can receive Him again. Then, I recited my ABC’s for Him, counted from one to ten for Him, and I told Him a ghost story!"

Three little vignettes of faith: from the 13th, the 19th, and the early 20th century (the last story, a true one, is from Fr. Dan Lord, SJ). Three very different souls, in different ages and places, united in wondrous contemplation of the Mysterium Fidei, the "Mystery of Faith," that Jesus, their "best and wisest Friend," as Aquinas said, should come to them in Holy Communion, their closest union with Him this side of Heaven. In each vignette, in its own way, we glimpse the joyous awe we should be able to expect of a Catholic in any age, who, although unworthy, hears the invitation, "Behold the Lamb of God," and approaches.

Now, for a moment, we must leave Reality — and those vignettes are indeed a glimpse of Reality, make no mistake; the wise man understands that Reality is best seen in a darkened chapel, discerned by the flickering red lamp which announces the Presence of the Lover of mankind. But let us, reluctantly, leave Reality for a few moments, and turn our gaze on the Disneyland of the Catholic Church in America.

I have been a parish priest for 18 years and, I must say, it gets more and more interesting by the day. Currently, I’m watching, with a kind of appalled fascination, the "Should John Kerry receive Holy Communion" debate, now broadened to include all pro-abortion politicians and that tedious question, "And What Are the Bishops Going To Do About It?" (The latter question is tedious because as often as it comes up, in whatever context, the answer always turns out the same.)

If we were standing on your front lawn awaiting the firefighters as your house burned down, and, as the dining room wing collapsed, you turned to me and mused about whether you need a larger or smaller dining room table for that room, I’d sit you down gently somewhere safe, get you a cup of cold water, and assume the stress had left you unhinged. Yet today, amid the shambles of Catholic life in this country, we’re all supposed to jump up and down and jabber in unison about John Kerry, pro-abort politician, supporter of even partial-birth abortion, receiving the Eucharist.

For what it is worth, this is the view from where I am sitting.

The sacramental discipline of the Church in this country has largely broken down. Mass attendance in our Diocese of Brooklyn is 18%; in New York, 19%; in Chicago, 16% (those are pre-scandal figures). The Most Blessed Sacrament is so little valued among Catholics that the overwhelming majority of them are not faithful to Sunday Mass. I am sure, though, that most of those who only pop in occasionally have no hesitation about approaching for Communion.

The Church’s catechetical program — a systematic, consistent method of passing on the faith that was Church-wide — was deliberately dismantled 40 years ago. Recently, a noted archbishop garnered attention because he told his peers that virtually all of the high school catechetical texts being used in our country are unsalvageable junk. There was much applause for his courage and insight; I choked over my coffee. Every one of the bishops knew this at least 30 years ago; dioceses were routinely marginalizing as kooks faithful Catholics who wrote letters protesting these developments.

The Eucharist has become the equivalent of a birthday cake. Even if someone has been very naughty, it is really, really mean to say that he cannot have a piece of the birthday cake. Birthday cake is an inclusion ritual, like a party favor or an ice-breaking in-group exercise. It says nothing more than, "You’re here. Welcome."

Catholics routinely stream up to Holy Communion who have not approached the confessional in years. The concept of being in a "state of grace," or of "mortal sin," even of "reverent awe" is so abstract as to be meaningless to most of our people (if that seems harsh to you, please remember that 82% of us aren’t even at Sunday Mass). "Father," I’ve heard more times than I can count, "I don’t come to Mass every Sunday, but I go to Communion because I consider myself to be a good person." Apparently, from the pulpits of many of our churches, there is continually preached an "I’m okay, you’re okay" religion of perpetual affirmation, summed up by one wag with this collect: "Lord, help us by your grace to continue to be the good people we really are."

Now, having mentioned pulpits, I would make an observation regarding those who complain that if priests would preach and teach the faith, the renewal might start. I, too, wish that parish priests consistently, forcefully, and faithfully taught the whole faith.

But remember the saga of Fr. Charlie Murr, recently reported in these pages. He accepted the pastorate of a faded city parish, St. Francis de Sales in New York City, and set about its renewal. He found the parish school in a fiscal and spiritual morass, with 66% of the students having failed the archdiocesan standardized religion test. And he had the legs cut out from under him by the cardinal, who ordered him to renew the contracts of five teachers, a principal and assistant principal whom he had not invited back for the following year. And Fr. Murr felt compelled to resign his pastorate. His parish council, all top-drawer New York professionals, likewise resigned in protest.

It’s a fact of life in our Church, as far as I can see, that my job as a parish priest is to keep most people, if not everyone, happy. Doctrinally faithful sermons will not do that. It is not that most Catholics want to be heretics; it is that they have never been formed in the Catholic faith. They have been fed a steady diet of this mutually affirming mommy religion for so long that to suggest that they might be sinners, or even that some sin they have embraced as a lifestyle is wrong, is to "attack" them. It is to be "mean," and Jesus was not mean. I am a good priest if I leave you smiling and feeling good; a bad priest otherwise.

So, back to the Kerry Communion War. This controversy is being publicly waged as though everyone understands what we believe is at stake: as though the Catholic Church in this country has, in the clearest, plainest, most affecting and majestic manner proclaimed and upheld the teaching on the Eucharist. But we have not even done that by example (as anyone familiar with the state of our liturgy knows), let alone by our words. Two-thirds of the Mass-going, active Catholics in this country can’t recognize our teaching on the Eucharist when it is set before them, as Gallup demonstrated.

And we have done an equally lousy job of teaching other areas of morality.

Catholics routinely approach for Communion who are engaged in premarital sex, extramarital sex, masturbation, contraception, homosexuality. Public, nonchalant dissent from Church teaching in these areas is easy to find among Catholics — not just those in public positions, but among those on religious education staffs in parishes and schools. While mountains of postconciliar documents have been churned out on various crucial issues, they have minimal impact in parish ministry and family life. Indeed, we’re at the stage where cafeteria Catholicism, picking and choosing from among the teachings of our and other religious traditions, is regarded as a virtue.

If we’re really, brutally honest, we’ll admit that most Catholics only know what the Church teaches about the crucial moral issues of our day because of the secular media. This is literally true. From the pulpit, they hear the Mutually Affirming Mommy Religion; the homily is a bright, cheery anecdote, a bit of application connected with the readings, a quote, a bit more reflection, and an affirming, warm conclusion.

It’s Time, Newsweek, The New York Times, and the evening news which will pass along to the public that the Catholic Church opposes active homosexuality, contraception, abortion, sterilization, remarriage after divorce. And, of course, those news outlets understandably present the "bottom line," as it were. "Thou Shalt Not." They don’t get into the rationale for the teaching. And our people almost never hear anything on these matters from the pulpit.

Which means that they are never formed in the Catholic faith. They may come to Mass, but they are, sadly, never really fed, never formed in the Catholic faith. And their attitudes and values morph into what we would expect of amiable pagans. We are, quite literally, at the point where most Catholics nod agreeably when it is suggested that "all religions lead to God," and accept the common dictum that truth is relative, that what is Truth for me may be different from your truth.

What should happen, you ask? The clarion call needs to be sounded. One of our shepherds needs to stand up and challenge his brethren and all of us, needs to say, honestly, "Enough, dear God! We have been in a state of crisis for 40 years, and it gets worse by the day!" We need an Elijah. We need another Hilkiah, who found the forgotten Book of the Law in the Temple; another Josiah, the king who wept as he heard it read to him, and ordered a bright, fierce renewal (2 Chron. 34:19).

We need to admit that we have strayed dangerously far from the path, as we look at our liturgy, catechesis, parish and rectory life, religious communities, seminaries, health care institutions, family life, moral theology. We’ve got to admit that there is something deeply wrong. We have to stop this silliness of jumping up to chase the occasional incident like John Kerry with an ecclesiastical Band-Aid, as though that’s the answer, while ignoring the fact that the Gospel and the Catholic faith are being brazenly undermined in this country by many, many priests, religious, diocesan bureaucracies, religious orders, "Catholic" publications such as The National Catholic Reporter, "Catholic" journalists and public figures, and on and on and on. The one recognizable virtue to many Catholics today is "broad-mindedness;" their notion of Truth is completely relative. And, as a Church, we have done this to ourselves.

But I do not think we will hear this clarion call, or see our Hilkiah or Josiah any time soon. I watched Bishop Wilton Gregory catechizing that press conference about the National Review Board’s sexual abuse report and how it’s about "the children, the children, the children," whereas it is really about the bishops, the bishops, the bishops. This episcopate will never do anything but spin the problems; won’t ever settle down to address the hard work of renewal.

Watching the bishops’ conference in action is like viewing the film of a train wreck over and over again. With bright-colored clowns hanging out the train windows, waving and blowing kisses. One only wishes one had a tomato.

In the midst of it all, there’s one deep consolation, the one thing needful that they have not yet taken away: that still I can come forward and say with confidence, "I receive thee, Price of my soul’s salvation." And that is no small thing, at all, at all. But how long, O Lord?


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; communion; kerry; mass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-280 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2004 9:03:33 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diago; narses; Loyalist; BlackElk; american colleen; saradippity; Polycarp; Dajjal; ...
Okay, for all you "conciliar Catholics" who think traditionalists have gone off the deep end, here is an article from The Wanderer, the newspaper that invented neo-Catholicism, written by a diocesan priest who says the New Mass. Boy, Fr. Wilson sure has a way with words. It starts a little slow, but he sure is rocking and rolling by the end. And he's not pulling any punches.

"The house is burning down." If you won't believe it when it comes from a traditionalist, maybe you'll believe it coming from Fr. Wilson.

I love the way he writes:

"Yet today, amid the shambles of Catholic life in this country, we’re all supposed to jump up and down and jabber in unison about John Kerry, pro-abort politician, supporter of even partial-birth abortion, receiving the Eucharist."

"From the pulpits of many of our churches, there is continually preached an "I’m okay, you’re okay" religion of perpetual affirmation, summed up by one wag with this collect: "Lord, help us by your grace to continue to be the good people we really are."

"It is not that most Catholics want to be heretics; it is that they have never been formed in the Catholic faith. They have been fed a steady diet of this mutually affirming mommy religion for so long that to suggest that they might be sinners, or even that some sin they have embraced as a lifestyle is wrong, is to "attack" them. It is to be "mean," and Jesus was not mean. I am a good priest if I leave you smiling and feeling good; a bad priest otherwise."

If I kept excerpting all the great lines, I'd end up re-posting the whole article. But for anyone who is still willing to stand by the "new springtime of the faith" cant, and who wants to keep promoting a "happy face" version of the Catholic Church, here is one last line to remember:
"Watching the bishops’ conference in action is like viewing the film of a train wreck over and over again. With bright-colored clowns hanging out the train windows, waving and blowing kisses. One only wishes one had a tomato."

2 posted on 05/10/2004 9:14:05 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
It is a good thing to remind Catholics that certain acts are sins. But tormenting and torturing them with it, as some religious from the old school did, is wrong and quite another matter.
3 posted on 05/10/2004 9:20:57 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; saradippity; Siobhan; Canticle_of_Deborah; NYer; Phx_RC; narses
Which means that they are never formed in the Catholic faith. They may come to Mass, but they are, sadly, never really fed, never formed in the Catholic faith.

Worth repeating.

We are, quite literally, at the point where most Catholics nod agreeably when it is suggested that "all religions lead to God," and accept the common dictum that truth is relative, that what is Truth for me may be different from your truth.

UGH. I hear this mantra year after year from our parish nun who is the director and teaches the OCIA program. Every year she tells the story of her missionary work in Africa, and although the people didn't know Jesus or God, "they had a sense of who 'God' was." And at that point, she felt her missionary work was complete.

Note, our parish alone has one of the highest number of cathechists and catechumens join The Church every year in the Phoenix Diocese. Please offer your prayers to them.

4 posted on 05/10/2004 9:29:40 PM PDT by kstewskis ("Political correctness is intellectual terrorism..." M.G.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Wow. Very good article.

But unless this priest is in a very unusual diocese, he has just offended his bishop and most of the bureacracy. He will be punished. And if he doesn't come around, punished again and again.

This state of the Church didn't come about by accident. Church attendance and widespread ignorance show this is no popular revolution. But it is a revolution, and like all others it has its fanatics. The fanatics are very well represented among the Church bureacracy and of course among the bishops themselves.

5 posted on 05/10/2004 9:33:26 PM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
But unless this priest is in a very unusual diocese, he has just offended his bishop and most of the bureacracy. He will be punished.

It's my impression that Fr. Wilson has burned that bridge behind him a long time ago. But considering how outspoken he has become, it's surprising that he is given any parish assignments at all, even the bottom of the barrel. Perhaps there is a silver lining to the dark cloud of the priest shortage. I know another priest in a different diocese who is in the same position. They know what he thinks, but they need every possible warm body, so they can't afford to do anything about it.

6 posted on 05/10/2004 9:45:50 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Great article.
7 posted on 05/10/2004 10:37:03 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (The day the Church abandons her universal tongue is the day before she returns to the catacombs-PXII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Okay, for all you "conciliar Catholics" who think traditionalists have gone off the deep end,

Look, I have nothing against traditionalists, provided they really are traditionalists, i.e., loyal to the Catholic Church. What I have a problem with are the so-called traditionalists who dissent from the Magisterium and join that schismatic sect, but still claim to be faithful Catholics. They should renounce the Church. Better an honest Protestant than a dishonest Catholic.

8 posted on 05/10/2004 10:59:10 PM PDT by findingtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth
I will second that. I am often taken as a traditionalist myself (and don't mind the title itself) and though I am only a fairly recent convert, I am under no illusions about the desperate condition the Church is in (not that most Protestant sects are in even worse shape). My only bone of contention is that the way to respond to this is the way of St Pius V rather than Martin Luther. We need to "get Jesuit" on these people, teach the true Catholic faith and the importance of tradition as well as (also like the Jesuits) remain firmly united and loyal to our Holy Father.
9 posted on 05/10/2004 11:31:50 PM PDT by Guelph4ever (“Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et tibi dabo claves regni coelorum”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: findingtruth
Let's assume for the sake of argument that the SSPX is schismatic.

What did they do to become so?

Disobeyed an order of the Holy Father.

In other words, assuming they are schismatic, they are schismatic over an adminstrative matter, and not because they dissent in any slightest sliver of the Catholic Faith.

Yet priests who promote homosexuality and other forms of sexual license, who deny the Resurrection, who deny the Transubstantiation, are "real" Catholics and people who stood in the way of an effort to obliterate the Mass of the Centuries are not?

And why did that administrative matter arise in the first place? Why, to stop the SSPX from opposing the destruction of the Catholic Church. So, having refused that order, they are now separated from the Church?

It seems more reasonable to me to think that the Supernatural Entity that is the Church has transferred its temporal locus from the Vatican to the SSPX than to believe that the SSPX are not Catholic.

Unfortunately, we live in an era in which it is not only possible, but easy, to be more Catholic than the Pope.
10 posted on 05/11/2004 1:00:49 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Guelph4ever
The only thing that the Holy Father would need to do to reconcile the SSPX and end this ruckus is to guarantee, effectively, that any priest was allowed to celebrate the Tridentine any time, any place.

Seems easy enough to me. Seems like the right thing to do.

Why doesn't he?
11 posted on 05/11/2004 1:04:18 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
If we were standing on your front lawn awaiting the firefighters as your house burned down, and, as the dining room wing collapsed, you turned to me and mused about whether you need a larger or smaller dining room table for that room, I’d sit you down gently somewhere safe, get you a cup of cold water, and assume the stress had left you unhinged.

Fr. Wilson bumpus ad summum

12 posted on 05/11/2004 2:58:22 AM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
The only thing that the Holy Father would need to do to reconcile the SSPX and end this ruckus is to guarantee, effectively, that any priest was allowed to celebrate the Tridentine any time, any place.
Seems easy enough to me. Seems like the right thing to do.
Why doesn't he?

Exactly!

13 posted on 05/11/2004 2:59:47 AM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dsc
I am only just learning in recent months about this SSPX and Tridentine Mass controversy. I'd heard of it but just never was that interested. I am a 100% Catholic, so I guess "traditionalist" and I also thought any one CAN say a Tridentine Mass, but it takes special permission (actually a dispensation) from the bishop of that diocese. I know many people in various parts of California who go to Tridentine Masses. Yet there are also some bishops who deny the permission. You who are clearly so knowledgeable about this, forgive me, but can you explain to me: what EXACTLY is a Tridentine Mass? And why is it so controversial, as long as the "regular" Mass is still completely available to everyone? THANKS!
14 posted on 05/11/2004 4:32:33 AM PDT by enuu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; dansangel
Thanks for posting. Great article. I will sent it on th more..
15 posted on 05/11/2004 4:44:37 AM PDT by .45MAN ("Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Great article, my husband printed it up and gave it to me to read last night.

As a Catholic homeschooler of many years I continualy meet other Catholic parents who do not know their Faith, and are steered into very wrong directions by neo Catholic convert superstars and cradle Catholic opportunists who engage in profound amounts of religious indifferentism by continually drumming into Catholic parents heads that it is ok to use non catholic philosophies and non Catholic school materials in their classrooms.

In the Arlington Diocese the most egregious and prevalent example of this institutionalized Church support for other philosophies over and above the teaching of Catholic dogma is that the Arlington Catholic Herald publishes the work of a 'Catholic' homeschooler whose sole purpose in life is to promote the Anglican anti Catholic philosophy of Charlotte Mason, an early 20th century British educator.

We can then move to 'Catholic' homeschool experts who publish very well read books on Catholic Homeschooling, and organize Catholic homeschooling networks, for example NACHE and TORCH which encourage and praise the use of non Catholic materials, non-scholastic education, indifferentism, naturalism, all under the guise of Catholic homeschooling.

Further evidence of the success of the NACHE approach has been the instigation on their part for the establishment of guidelines which are imposed on Catholic homeschoolers across the nation, whereby Sacraments are withheld unless the homeschoolers put their children into the CCD classes of the local parishes. Thereby making sure all Catholic children are run through the mill of the American Church non educational agenda of CCD.

The deliberate suppression of Catholic Dogma begins at the top in this country and has many collaborators.

16 posted on 05/11/2004 4:47:25 AM PDT by Smocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1; dubyaismypresident
ping
17 posted on 05/11/2004 5:01:32 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Fr. Wilson is correct about a lot of things. One is that Catechesis has been non-existent for a long time. Longer than I have been in this earth. Catholics don't know the faith and don't know how to defend it. I grew up in the 70's and we could have learned the Baltimore Catechism by rote just like our parents did without any problem. At least we'd know it.

It would be nice if the bishops would do their jobs and try, at least, to see to it that true catechesis is taught. I'm still waiting for Burke to take a good look at the state of "religion" education in the vaunted Catholic high schools here. He'd be appalled. I'm glad at least Hughes spoke out about it.

As for Bishop Wilton Gregory, a figurehead if there ever was one, I don't know how reasonable people can't see that this poor man was elected to be a puppet. He is a very good man, misguided in many ways, but he did clean up some big messes in Belleville. Gregory is not what I would call leadership material. There aren't very many of them in the hierarchy in the US right now. Those that are good conservative leaders are continually smeared. Hmmmm....ever wonder why?

One last little thing, always keep in mind (another point of Catechesis, in a way, I learned on my own) that evil and Satan choose to do their work behind closed doors, in secret and use subversion as their weapons. Because it's not in plain sight, it's not believed. Right now, we are divided, conservatives and liberals, left and right, traditionalists and moderists. Those of us who are traditional in our outlook and practice, but still attend NO Masses are reviled by both sides, from one due to our piety and "backwardsness" and from the other because we aren't of a mind to run from the current mess instead of working to fix the problems. Satan must be laughing at all the mischief he's caused.
18 posted on 05/11/2004 5:15:25 AM PDT by Desdemona (Evil attacks good. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
From the pulpit, they hear the Mutually Affirming Mommy Religion

Then Find another Pulpit. God Does provide.......

19 posted on 05/11/2004 5:38:49 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
great article!

bump and mark.
20 posted on 05/11/2004 6:05:35 AM PDT by MudPuppy (To Jesus Through the Immaculate Heart of Mary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson