Skip to comments.
Olmsted's stamp on Diocese [of Phoenix]
East Valley Tribune [AZ] ^
| May 2, 2004
| Lawn Griffiths
Posted on 05/02/2004 3:32:02 PM PDT by Phx_RC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
...better, Better, BETTER . . .and its going to get better than that!
Note: Underlines and bolds added for emphasis.
1
posted on
05/02/2004 3:32:02 PM PDT
by
Phx_RC
To: heyheyhey; NYer; AAABEST; ninenot; BlackElk; fidelis; TotusTuus; Jeff Chandler; Tantumergo; ...
The good Bishop Olmsted needs our help.
Please contact him and convey your support.
The Bishop and the Diocese of Phoenix can be reached:
By Phone: 602-257-0030,
By Fax: 602-354-2427,
By
e-mail
By mail:
Diocese of Phoenix
400 East Monroe Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2336
If you have any information that might help the Bishop
regarding Fr. Cunningham, regardless of how old it is,
or about any priest involved with No Longer Silent
please read subsequent posts for advise and further details.
If you have a private question or comment use FReepMail.
2
posted on
05/02/2004 3:52:51 PM PDT
by
Phx_RC
(The good bishops deserve and need our fervent and continuing support.)
To: Phx_RC
If you have any information that might help the Bishop regarding Fr. Cunningham, regardless of how old it is, or about any priest involved with No Longer Silent You don't want to "help" Olmsted; you want to destroy priests. If Olmsted is the man of God you paint him to be, he will refuse your "help."
3
posted on
05/02/2004 3:58:55 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: Phx_RC
It is becoming clear that Bishop Olmstead understand the nature of the problem with the Phoenix Diocese.
4
posted on
05/02/2004 4:01:08 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Why the long face, John?)
To: Jeff Chandler
understand = understands
5
posted on
05/02/2004 4:01:33 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Why the long face, John?)
To: sinkspur
You don't want to "help" Olmsted; you want to destroy priests. If Olmsted is the man of God you paint him to be, he will refuse your "help." What the heck are you talking about? Phx_RC asked for information. Information is not a bad thing.
Obviously, some of the priests in that diocese are in need of correction. That they are corrected benefits everyone in the diocese, including the priests themselves.
This is what it looks like when a bishop just does his job. We should be seeing this sort of action from the chanceries all over the country. That we are not only points to the sad state of the episcopacy in the U.S.
6
posted on
05/02/2004 4:43:57 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Just another medieval Catholic)
To: Phx_RC
"What you are seeing is a move by the ultra-conservative branch of the Catholic Church to bring the parish priests in line to the bishop's thinking," he said. Wow. I call it a move by the obeyers-of-Church-law-and-Church-doctrine branch of the Catholic Church to bring the parish priests in line with doctrine and Church law.
7
posted on
05/02/2004 5:05:42 PM PDT
by
BlessedBeGod
('I went to Vietnam, yada yada yada, I want to be President...")
To: sinkspur
Then you wonder why people think you're a troll. You're on the wrong side of nearly every issue.
8
posted on
05/02/2004 5:07:52 PM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: sinkspur
>>You don't want to "help" Olmsted; you want to destroy priests. If Olmsted is the man of God you paint him to be, he will refuse your "help."<<
Do you really think that a man who is openly going against the church teachings in regard to sex should really call himself a priest?
9
posted on
05/02/2004 5:49:00 PM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(For Tali Hatuel, her son & daughters Tehila, 11; Hadar, 9; Roni, 7; and Meirav, 2 - Kill Arafat)
To: Phx_RC
Thanks for the ping!
To: Phx_RC
Bishop Olmsted, you rock, sir!
11
posted on
05/02/2004 8:39:36 PM PDT
by
Romish_Papist
(Father, forgive me, for I know not what I do.)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
`
12
posted on
05/02/2004 10:02:01 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: sinkspur
"You don't want to "help" Olmsted; you want to destroy priests."
No child-molesting, resurrection-denying scumbag is too corrupt to be a priest in your view, eh?
13
posted on
05/02/2004 10:17:18 PM PDT
by
dsc
To: dsc
No child-molesting, resurrection-denying scumbag is too corrupt to be a priest in your view, eh? I missed the child molesting in these priests background.
Can you give me some specific cites?
14
posted on
05/02/2004 10:19:29 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: sinkspur
"I missed the child molesting in these priests background."
They're homo activists. Homo activists are homos. Homos bugger underage boys.
The sky is blue, the sea is wet. One and one are two; two and two are four. Anything else in the category of "the bleeding obvious" that you need explained, your liberalness?
15
posted on
05/02/2004 10:27:18 PM PDT
by
dsc
To: dsc
Conjecture.
I asked for some specific citations, and you give me musings.
I assume you have nothing specific against these priests.
16
posted on
05/02/2004 10:32:47 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: sinkspur
Resurrection-denying is okay, but child molesting is where you draw the line?
Good ole sinky, always good for a laugh.
17
posted on
05/02/2004 10:46:19 PM PDT
by
Notwithstanding
(Good parents don't let their kids attend public school or watch most TV)
To: Notwithstanding
Resurrection-denying is okay, but child molesting is where you draw the line? Context and citation backing up your statements would be welcome.
18
posted on
05/02/2004 10:48:16 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: sinkspur
The poster mentioned two bald allegations against this group:
1)resurrection-denying and
2) child-molesting
yet you objected only to child-molestation.
Its not too hard to follow. I know it is late for you, but try to keep up.
19
posted on
05/02/2004 10:54:31 PM PDT
by
Notwithstanding
(Good parents don't let their kids attend public school or watch most TV)
To: Notwithstanding
I'd like some citations, backing that up. "Mentioning" is not convincing.
20
posted on
05/02/2004 10:55:47 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson