This is a news item...a good news item :o)
1 posted on
03/01/2004 10:08:30 AM PST by
tame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: tame
SPOTREP - THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST
To: tame
4 posted on
03/01/2004 10:16:13 AM PST by
The Mayor
(There is no such thing as insignificant service for Christ.)
To: Jim Robinson; AnnaZ; Outraged; mrs tiggywinkle; texasflower; Nan48; midwestjenny; AgThorn; ...
Hisorical Facts in the Passion Ping!
5 posted on
03/01/2004 10:28:00 AM PST by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: tame
I suspect he went easy on a lot more than that.
7 posted on
03/01/2004 10:31:22 AM PST by
onedoug
To: tame
Thanks for the post. Very good compilation of the relevant passages.
RamS
9 posted on
03/01/2004 10:32:54 AM PST by
RamingtonStall
(Ride Hard and far! ..... and with GPS, Know where you are!)
To: tame
There has been a lot spoken and written about the "undue violence" in Mel Gibson's movie Such a lame argument it is..............
10 posted on
03/01/2004 10:33:37 AM PST by
Cold Heat
(In politics stupidity is not a handicap. --Napoleon Bonapart)
To: tame
Thank you for this post as it was exactly the sentiment I echoed upon seeing the movie; based on my readings & teachings of the gospels over many years my understanding and belief was that, indeed, as noted here, that Mel Gibson's portrayal was very accurate and, if anything, a little light on the treatment of Jesus; another example being how they cast lots for his posessions, something which is portrayed but only slightly in the film. As for the portrayals of the thorny crown piercing his head & face + the beatings endured after Pilate had first turned him over to be punished, my understanding was always that those periods were indeed horrific and that the portrayal in "The Passion ..." were accurate if not tame at the least.
To: tame
If I'm not mistaken, didn't they also rip (pluck) the beard from his face?
I'll have to see if I can find the passage...
15 posted on
03/01/2004 10:38:06 AM PST by
ItsOurTimeNow
("By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!")
To: tame
Thanks! I'm putting this aside for contemplation.
Additionally, Jesus' appearance in the movie exactly matches the image on the Shroud of Turin. (I have looked at the Shroud a hundred times but have never before noticed the whip marks. I guess I assumed that the marks would only be on His back.)
16 posted on
03/01/2004 10:39:35 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: tame; scripter
Bump
17 posted on
03/01/2004 10:41:57 AM PST by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: tame
For interpretation I feel that marring Cavizel's face any further would have distracted the dramatic impact and the actor's phenomenal emotional and spiritual treatment of Jesus' suffering.
"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for Thou art with me..."
20 posted on
03/01/2004 10:46:16 AM PST by
Outraged
To: tame
Thank you so very much. I guess Jamie Bernard, William Sapphire, and other critics who fiercely bashed and castigated The Passion's "violence" obviously hadn't done their homework. :)
25 posted on
03/01/2004 10:53:20 AM PST by
demnomo
To: Eaker; TheMom
"biblical bases for physical abuse in The Passion" ping
29 posted on
03/01/2004 11:13:23 AM PST by
thackney
(Life is Fragile, Handle with Prayer)
To: tame
Thank you, Tame, for posting this. I have been saying this for some time in response to the prissy preachers who whine that the movie depicted too much gore and violence.
They have been deluded by a "gospel" that has been sanitized and stripped of the reality of the cross.
Even worse than the physical aspect of the cross was the private transaction between the Christ and the Father as the spiritual judgement that is rightfully ours was poured out on Jesus instead. We dodn't get to see that one.
To: tame
43 posted on
03/01/2004 12:13:33 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: tame
My question is at the end of the movie, the temple was torn down - by God. Does it say that in the Bible?
To: tame
To be blunt, it appears from the accounts cited that Jesus' face was beaten to a swollen pulp. This may account for the fact that, after Jesus resurrection, the disciples on the road to Emmaus did not recognize him even as they spoke to him! (Luke, chapter 24)I don't believe the beaten face & body would have remained...only the pierced scars. I would think the scars would have made Jesus MORE recognizable as there probably weren't too many people walking around with battered bodies. Think of a boxer. His beating around the face doesn't last.
Thought the Holy Spirit prevented those on the road to Emmaus from knowing who Jesus was & later assisted in the recognition.
To: tame
Good post!
As mentioned privately my conerns are not about the violence ... I will elaborate on this later when I have a minute.
63 posted on
03/01/2004 5:17:58 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: tame
Has anyone here ever been punched out repeatedly in the face? Your face swells op and looks very distorted - it takes on a grotesque, flattened apperance. This was somewhat captured in the film Raging Bull.
71 posted on
03/01/2004 6:29:56 PM PST by
Zechariah11
("so they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver.")
To: tame
Quite frankly: so what?
79 posted on
03/01/2004 8:04:47 PM PST by
Pahuanui
(When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson