Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passing on the Keys
Catholic Exchange ^ | January 31, 2004 | Gary Shirley

Posted on 01/31/2004 6:01:39 AM PST by Desdemona

Passing on the Keys

1/31/04

It’s election year in America. Time to endure that painful process where politicians, pollsters and pundits all vie for the national spotlight. Truth is stretched beyond recognition. Promises vaporize. Supposed chaos will prevail if we do not elect some enlightened candidate to save the nation.

When a Pope Dies

Given our relative success with this “experiment in liberty,” we Americans may think that elected office is our own invention. Fact is, this young republic is still on training wheels. The Catholic Church has trod this path for the better part of two millennia. Perhaps it is worth revisiting the oldest electoral process in the world, which gives one billion Catholics their Supreme Pontiff. The Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, promulgated by Pope John Paul II on February 22, 1996, provides clear guidance on how the Church is to go about selecting the next Vicar of Christ.

The passing of a pope is one of those moments that can virtually define an era. It is among the pivotal events that serve as milestones in a life span, such as JFK’s fateful visit to Dallas or Neil Armstrong’s first steps on the moon. A vacancy in the See of Peter prompts an outpouring of love coupled with a whirlwind of speculation. It closes the door of history and opens the window of opportunity. First, however, we grieve.

The Apostolic Constitution prescribes a nine-day mourning period in honor of the deceased pope, with burial to occur between the fourth and sixth days. This duration has both a devotional aspect and a practical one. Proper mourning protocols must be observed for this citizen of the world. As the pope is a Head of State, the Vatican will serve as host to both secular and religious leaders who attend the funeral rites and pay the respects of their particular society. With few exceptions, the business of the Church is essentially stopped during this time of reflection and prayer. Even any Councils or Synods in progress are immediately suspended until approved to continue by the new pope.

This period of time is largely overseen by an individual known as the Cardinal Camerlengo or Chamberlain. His job, as described in the Apostolic Constitution, is “...safeguarding and administering the goods and temporal rights of the Holy See.” He meets with the College of Cardinals to decide issues that include funeral and interment details, approval of expenditures, destruction of the Fisherman’s Ring, lodging assignments for the arriving electors and selection of the theologians who will prepare the two key meditations. These meditations are mandated by the Constitution and will ultimately be delivered to the gathered College of Cardinals. The meditations focus on the problems facing the Church and the need for discernment in the coming election. Given that the Cardinal electors hail from every corner of the globe, these meditations will help them to understand the “State of the Church.”

Cardinals Under Lock and Key

The College of Cardinals is restricted by the Constitution to a total of 120 eligible voters. As long as a Cardinal has not yet reached his 80th birthday on the day of the pope’s death, he may cast a vote in the election. Thanks to the vision of Pope John Paul II, the College enjoys a multi-national composition, which is sure to translate into a rich harvest of qualified papabile, or papal candidates. Not all Cardinals are bishops, so it is possible that the electors could choose a man for the papacy who does not possess the highest degree of Holy Orders. As the pope is first and foremost the Bishop of Rome, the Apostolic Constitution calls for the immediate episcopal consecration of the new pontiff, if necessary.

The electoral process must begin no sooner than 15 and no later than 20 days after the death of the pope. The election takes place in the Sistine Chapel. During the proceedings the Cardinals will be required to lodge in the Vatican City State, primarily in the newly-constructed Domus Sanctae Marthae residence. This is to ensure a degree of isolation from outside influences as they undertake their sacred duty. The electors are restricted from using any method of personal communication or being exposed to the newspaper, radio, television or Internet. They may not even be approached for conversation as they proceed each day from their lodging to the Sistine Chapel.

The papal election process begins with a solemn Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica. This is followed by a dignified procession of the Princes of the Church into the Sistine Chapel. Here sacred oaths are administered to each elector and associated papal staff to ensure the perpetual secrecy of the proceedings. Once these tasks are completed, staff members are dismissed and the chapel doors are locked forthwith. The conclave (from cum clave, “with a key”) now begins.

Absent any questions on election procedure from the Cardinals, the balloting begins immediately. Total secrecy is paramount. Each elector casts a single handwritten vote, carrying it forward to be placed in a designated vessel for counting. One by one the votes are checked, re-checked and recorded aloud. The ballots are then pierced with a needle and gathered together on one thread to preclude any being misplaced. On the first day of the conclave, only one ballot is taken. Each subsequent day will include two ballots in the morning and two in the afternoon, as necessary.

The gathering in the Sistine Chapel is not about speeches, debates or discussion. It is about discerning the will of the Holy Spirit and reflecting that will in a ballot. Throughout this process, the Cardinals assemble for each session and vote immediately. Should the vote not yield a clear winner, the second vote is taken with no delay.

A two-thirds majority is necessary for election. Should the number of electors not be divisible by three, then two-thirds majority plus one additional vote are required. Should a pope not be elected in three days, the conclave will enter a day of prayer and dialogue. The Constitution then allows for another seven balloting opportunities (three additional days). These are again followed by another day of prayer should no pope be chosen. On several occasions in Church history the process of selecting a pope has gone on for years!

Full and Universal Authority Given the global presence of the papacy, the outside world anxiously awaits the results of the voting. Television cameras remain focused on the chimney of the Sistine Chapel, awaiting a simple, yet telling, billow of smoke. If no pope is elected during a particular session, all the paper ballots are burned along with some straw, giving off black smoke. Success in electing a pope is indicated by all the paper ballots being burned alone, resulting in white smoke. Just prior to that moment, two important questions had been asked of the man so chosen: “Do you accept your canonical election as Supreme Pontiff?” A positive response is followed by the second query, “By what name do you wish to be called?” These answered, the newly-elected pope immediately possesses the full and universal authority of the office.

Once he is duly empowered, the Cardinals come forward one by one to offer homage and pledge obedience to the new Vicar of Christ. Papal tailors are standing by to outfit His Holiness for the official introduction to the world. In short order, the announcement goes out from the Apostolic Palace to the crowd in St. Peter’s Square and to the world, Habemus papem (“We have a pope”). The new Holy Father steps out onto his balcony and greets the faithful while offering his blessing, Urbi et Orbi, “to the city and the world.”

It has been over twenty-five years since the last papal conclave. Technology has taken quantum leaps. Empires have imploded. Kings, presidents and prime ministers have come and gone. Still, Holy Mother Church goes on, protecting and promulgating the truth and promise of Jesus Christ. She ensures that the line of leadership succession from St. Peter continues through the ages by providing the world’s Catholics with visible authority — Catholics who extend a welcome and offer a prayer for the newest Vicar of Christ and “Servant of the Servants of God.”


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; History; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: catholiclist

1 posted on 01/31/2004 6:01:39 AM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer; Salvation; All
ping

Just a refresher. It's been 25 years.
2 posted on 01/31/2004 6:02:29 AM PST by Desdemona (Kempis' Imitation of Christ online! http://www.leaderu.com/cyber/books/imitation/imitation.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Excellent post.
(Was just about ready to post it myself.)


3 posted on 01/31/2004 10:08:19 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Catholic_list; father_elijah; nickcarraway; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Siobhan; Lady In Blue; attagirl; ...
Catholic Discussion Ping!

Please notify me via Freepmail if you would like to be added to or removed from the Catholic Discussion Ping list.

4 posted on 01/31/2004 10:09:40 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
It's a little early to bet on the death of the Holy Father.

He took some 9mm bullets a couple of decades ago and shook it off. I'll bet he lives to be 100.

5 posted on 01/31/2004 10:14:13 AM PST by LibKill (My sigil: Two crossed, dead, Frenchmen emblazoned on a mound of dead Frenchmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
I'm not betting on anything, just refreshing the protocol in memory.
6 posted on 01/31/2004 10:17:58 AM PST by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
I'm not betting on anything, just refreshing the protocol in memory.

Of course. I apologize for my ill-worded post. I did not mean that you were betting on the Holy Father dying anytime soon.

7 posted on 01/31/2004 10:23:28 AM PST by LibKill (My sigil: Two crossed, dead, Frenchmen emblazoned on a mound of dead Frenchmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
A two-thirds majority is necessary for election. Should the number of electors not be divisible by three, then two-thirds majority plus one additional vote are required.

This is untrue. One of the several unfortunate changes that Pope John Paul II has made to the conclave process is that only an absolute majority (half plus one) is required for electing the next pope.

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20030929-090655-1999r.htm

The New Cardinals' Virtues

[excerpt]

Very few traditions of the Church have been left untrampled in the 25 years of this papacy. Of ultimate significance will be John Paul II's uprooting of the 800-year-old mechanics for electing popes. Since 1179, at least two-thirds of the votes of the college of cardinals were needed to elect a new pope. In 1996, John Paul II lowered this requirement to a less definitive absolute majority, or 50 percent-plus-one vote. This innovation to papal elections is significant because the requirement for a two-thirds majority was designed to protect tradition.

At various times in history, it has been conceivable that a heterodox candidate could gain a majority, but it would be unlikely that two-thirds of all cardinals would ever vote for a revolutionary. Also in the past, cardinals had to live in primitive quarters during papal conclaves, an uncomfortable situation that was intended to force speedy votes that would prevent radicals from holding out to get their way. John Paul II has built a luxury hotel to house the cardinals for the next election.

It is an old Roman saying that no one is more conservative than a retired cardinal. The practical basis for this axiom is a history of hundreds of years of old cardinals voting for popes more faithful to tradition than those the same cardinals supported when they were younger. The logic behind the customary change in behavior is obvious. At the prime of a cleric's career, it is easier to climb the hierarchical ladder by playing politics and backing popular trends of the day than by standing firm to dogmas promulgated by men long-dead. Upon retirement, when there are no more honors or offices left to gain, and when old men are looking mortality in the face, many cardinals appreciate anew the need to protect the institution and time-proven traditions. In 1970, Pope Paul VI razed this rampart of conservatism by prohibiting cardinals 80 years old or older from voting for pope.

8 posted on 01/31/2004 11:03:46 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
Thanks for that info. I did not know that JPII changed the rules. Any speculation on his motives?

BTW, isn't "50 percent-plus-one vote" called a plurality rather than a majority?
9 posted on 02/01/2004 1:09:38 PM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
I've no idea why the change was made, but see it as a bad move.

The article called it an "absolute majority" and I copied. Can't a plurality include if there are 3 candidates and one gets 40% versus the other two getting 30% each?

10 posted on 02/01/2004 7:17:10 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
BTW, isn't "50 percent-plus-one vote" called a plurality rather than a majority?

No. A plurality is a more than three-way split, each with less than 50%.

11 posted on 02/01/2004 7:48:16 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Thanks re "plurality". I was having a stupid attack.
12 posted on 02/02/2004 3:04:54 PM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
Yes, you are right about plurality. I had a brain hiccup.
13 posted on 02/02/2004 3:06:08 PM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
A plurality is a 3 or more way split, not a more than 3 way split. And the possessor of the plurality is the single individual with the greatest percentage of votes, that percentage being less than 50% + 1 vote.
14 posted on 02/02/2004 7:45:48 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Good article.
15 posted on 02/02/2004 7:54:33 PM PST by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson