Posted on 12/02/2003 11:02:12 AM PST by NYer
Today, while still engaging Evangelicalism and Fundamentalism, the new apologetics movement has broadened and responds to confusions and challenges from all quarters, including from within the Church. And its proving unexpectedly successful. The author provides an overview of the development, current status, and importance of the new apologetics movement within the Church. The future, we now see, belongs to those who are unafraid to proclaim and defend the fullness of Catholic truth.
Sometimes, upon being introduced as a Catholic apologist, I ask my listeners whether they know what an apologist is. Eyes are lowered in shame and heads shake, so I explain, with a straight face, that an apologist is someone who goes around the country apologizing for being a Catholic. Most people laugh, but some dont. They think Im being serious. To them, apology simply means Im sorry.
Chalk it up to ignorance of Greek roots and to the fact that, for a third of a century, apologetics has been in disrepute. As late as the eve of Vatican II, apologetics was taught in seminaries and Catholic colleges, where it was understood as the art of using reason to explain and defend the faith. Then, almost overnight, it disappeared from the curriculum. Worse, it disappeared from practice. Even those trained in it declined to use its techniques. No longer was a challenge to the faith met head on; it was sidestepped through an appeal to a misunderstood ecumenism: We no longer should argue in favor of the Catholic faith; instead, we should try to understand the faith of non-Catholics as though the one precluded the other.
Soon there was a gaping hole in pulpit teaching, adult education, and publishers lists. At first nothing seemed amiss. But, just as it is true that ideas have consequences, so it is true that the lack of ideas has consequences. When the faith no longer was explained, when challenges were no longer met, when reason was laid aside in favor of a mushy irenicism, interest in Catholicism flagged. Those who no longer understood the faith saw little reason to practice it. Those who found their questions unanswered looked for answers elsewhere. Catholics voted with their feet and became lapsed Catholics or non-Catholics.
From this disarray has arisen the new apologetics movement.
But it is not the first movement to have that name. Todays revival of apologetics can be traced to a revival in the 1920s, when there arose a new interest in using reason to advance the faith in terms accessible to everyday believers and non-believers. In the English-speaking world this interest coalesced around the Catholic Evidence Guild, headquartered in London. Members of the Guild (almost exclusively laymen) became well-known for setting up pitches in Hyde Park, where they took on all comers. Apologetics was saved from the dry theology manuals of the preceding century, and it turned into a movement, dubbed the new apologetics. In the inter-war years many Catholics found their faith reinvigorated by a clear explanation and defense, and many non-Catholics found themselves coaxed Romeward.
Frank Sheed, probably the most influential Catholic apologist of our time, noted that in the first half of this century, a Catholic, merely as a Catholic, was an object of interest. . . . A Catholic speaker faced an audience of which practically every member had a solid and stateable and stated set of anti-Catholic prejudices. People were divided into two groups. One held what we now would call the prejudice of the Fundamentalist: The Catholic Church subverts the authority of Scripture, elevates Mary artificially, and is guilty of inventing countless doctrines and practices that are antithetical to authentic Christianity.
The other group accused the Church of denying mans animal ancestry and of thinking that the world was made in six days in other words, the secularist view. Both groups united in the view that the Church was hostile to virtue, intellectual freedom, [and] science.
Then after World War II came a sea of change. While the traditional anti-Catholic forces Fundamentalism and secularism continued to exist, they no longer were representative of the larger portion of society. People as a whole, said Sheed, referring to the situation at mid-century, do not care much who is put in place of Christ, what commandment gets broken, how anyone goes to God. . . . Indifference lies over all such things. They have not come to deny the existence of God or the supremacy of Christ; they have simply turned their mind elsewhere. They are not sufficiently interested to doubt.
Suddenly the Catholic apologist found himself facing a crowd which is almost totally apathetic. It retained a hostility to Catholicism, but a hostility from which all the sap has drained out. It is a hostility without vehemence and without shape a slight discoloration marking the place of what was once a great wound.
This was the situation on the eve of Vatican II. The tumult that followed the Council confirmed, in the minds of many, that even the type of apologetics that was successful earlier in the century should be abandoned, in favor of nothing. With unilateral disarmament came not an increased appreciation of Catholicism, but a hardening of opposition to it: a growing anti-Catholic sentiment among Bible Christians; a now-public attack from secularists; and, among the indifferent, an intellectual nimbyism that insisted that Catholic ideas should not intrude on the Im O.K., youre O.K. complacency of middle-class life.
And so over the last twenty or thirty years, as the Church seemed to implode, Catholics left in droves. Half a lifetime ago there may have been many lapsed Catholics, but there were few apostate Catholics. The dissatisfied may have stopped attending Mass, but they didnt attend services elsewhere. Today there are thousands of Bible churches in which the majority of the congregants are former Catholics. Other Catholics, adopting as their motto Pontius Pilates What is truth?, have ended trying to reconcile their faith with beliefs and practices that are incompatible with it.
The absence of the promotion of an intellectual component to the faith did not result in a slumbering Catholicism, but in a hemorrhaging Catholicism. Adult Catholics, deprived of solid catechesis, proved vulnerable to the arguments of proselytizers. This vulnerability, widely recognized but not widely understood, created an opening for a revival of apologetics. The revival came not at the urging of Church authorities, but spontaneously from the ranks of the laity, many of whom came to realize that their lot and the lot of those like them would not be improved if they kept to a Let Father do it stance. Even more than in the era of the Catholic Evidence Guild, todays new apologetics movement is a lay-run affair.
Dean Acheson, Secretary of State from 1949 to 1953, titled his memoirs Present at the Creation. I have a sense of what he meant, having found myself entering apologetics just as the new apologetics movement took shape. My 1988 book Catholicism and Fundamentalism was the first sustained response to the inroads made by modern Fundamentalism. It sought to stop the exodus of Catholics to Bible believing churches and seems to have been partly successful. Not surprisingly, the apologetics movement identified with the book concentrated at first on dealing with challenges posed by Bible Christians.
Today, while still engaging Evangelicalism and Fundamentalism, the movement has broadened and responds to confusions and challenges from all quarters, including from within the Church. And its proving unexpectedly successful. Perhaps that explains the recent Catholic attack on the new apologetics.
Until last April opposition among certain Catholics had remained low-key but nevertheless palpable. Despite lip service to Vatican IIs call for greater lay involvement, some clerics and religious seemed displeased that laymen were being successful in their area: instruction in the faith. Worse, the laymen conveyed the faith in its integrity, not with the doctrinal or moral looseness employed by many religious educators. The subterranean displeasure bubbled to the surface at a public lecture given by Prof. Thomas P. Rausch, a Jesuit teaching at Loyola Marymount University. Speaking at the seminary of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and later at the countrys largest catechetical congress, he lambasted the new apologists and named names: Scott and Kimberly Hahn, Peter Kreeft, Dale Vree, Thomas Howard, the late Sheldon Vanauken, and me.
I have answered Fr. Rauschs attack in a booklet called No Apology from the New Apologists. I need not repeat its argument here. What I wish to note is that his attack signaled not just a heightened opposition, but an acknowledgment of the success of todays apologetics. Those who sought to ignore it can no longer do so. Observers on all sides realize (but may not admit) that the methodologies and ideas of progressive Catholicism have failed. What was touted as the wave of the future just 30 years ago has ended up as the wave of the past. The future, we now see, belongs to those who are unafraid to proclaim and defend the fullness of Catholic truth.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Keating, Karl. Apologizing to the Masses. Lay Witness (February, 1998).
Reprinted with permission of Lay Witness magazine.
Lay Witness is a publication of Catholic United for the Faith, Inc., an international lay apostolate founded in 1968 to support, defend, and advance the efforts of the teaching Church.
THE AUTHOR
Karl Keating is the President of Catholic Answers, a lay organization which explains and defends the beliefs, history and practices of the Catholic Church. He also engages in public debates with leading anti-Catholics, and publishes This Rock magazine. Karl Keating is on the Advisory Board of the Catholic Educator's Resource Center.
Patrick Madrid is the publisher of Envoy magazine, a Catholic journal of apologetics and evangelization. Since its inception in 1996, the Envoy team has garnered several journalism awards, including the coveted magazine-of-the-year General Excellence award from the Catholic Press Association.
Patrick is the author of several books including, Pope Fiction, Any Friend of Gods Is a Friend of Mine, Where Is That In the Bible?, Search and Rescue, Why Is That In Tradition?, as well as editor of the acclaimed Surprised by Truth series. He is a contributor to the forthcoming Ignatius Press Encyclopedia of Catholic Apologetics. He has also produced many apologetics tape sets.
Active in fulltime apologetics since the late 1980s, he was the vice president of Catholic Answers from 1988-1995 and helped co-found that apostolate's flagship magazine, This Rock, in January of 1990.
Patrick is not a convert; he was raised in the Catholic Faith, growing up in Southern California. He earned a bachelor of science degree in business management from the University of Phoenix and has done graduate studies in theology in the IRPS program of the University of Dallas. His own story of recommitment to Christ, "Conclusions of a Guilty Bystander," appears in Surprised by Truth 2.
He is the host of two EWTN television and radio series: Pope Fiction and The Truth About Scripture and Tradition, and is the executive producer of the Envoy Communications radio program Right Here, Right Now.
At the invitation of bishops, priests, DREs, and lay groups, he has conducted hundreds of seminars and conferences, in English and Spanish, at parishes and universities across the United States, and abroad. He is a regular speaker at Franciscan University of Steubenvilles Defending the Faith summer conferences, and he's a veteran of over a dozen formal public debates with Protestant ministers, Mormon leaders, and other non-Catholic spokesmen.
Patrick and his wife Nancy have been blessed with eleven healthy and happy children. Their most important goal as a couple is to one day hear the Lord Jesus say to them and their children, Well done, good and faithful servants; you have been faithful over a little . . . now enter into the joy of your master (Matt. 25:21).
The "surprise" here is that he can find the time to write, lecture, maintain a blog ... and, occasionally post to FreeRepublic!
LINKS
Carl Olson
I grew up in a devout Fundamentalist Protestant home in western Montana. Raised by wonderful and godly parents, I developed an early love for reading, writing, and drawing. My father was a founding elder in a small Bible chapel, and we would attend services there three or four times a week. In junior high I had some poetry published, but my first love was drawing and painting. After high school, I attended art school for a couple of years, then attended Briercrest Bible College (BBC), an Evangelical Protestant college in Saskatchewan, Canada, graduating with an associates degree in 1991. At BBC, my interests in art, literature, and apologetics developed even further, and I was exposed to Catholic and Anglican theology and thought for the first time, as well as other Protestant traditions.
In 1991 I moved to Portland, Oregon, to work in graphic design and advertising. Shortly thereafter, I met Heather, who was attending Multnomah Bible College; we married in 1994. It was at this time that I began to seriously study the history and teachings of the Catholic Church, embarking on a journey that eventually led us to enter tthe Catholic Church together in 1997. Our story appeared in the June 1998 issue of This Rock ("Joining the Unsaved"), and in Surprised By Truth 3 (Sophia Press, 2002).
While working as creative director for a department store chain, I was able to pursue graduate studies, and in May 2000 I received a Masters in Theological Studies from the University of Dallas through the Institute for Pastoral and Religious studies program. Prior to joining the staff at Envoy, I was the director of catechesis and evangelization (2000-02) for Nativity of the Mother of God, a Byzantine Catholic parish in Springfield, Oregon. I have had the good fortune of writing articles for Envoy, This Rock, The Catholic Faith, Catholic Parent, Gilbert!, First Things, Saint Austin Review, New Covenant, National Catholic Register, and CatholicExchange.com. I have also been a guest on a number of radio and television shows.
Over the past few years I have written several articles about the Left Behind books and the Fundamentalist belief in the "Rapture." My book critiquing the Left Behind phenomenon and premillennial dispensationalism, titled Will Catholics Be Left Behind? A Catholic Critique of the Rapture and Today's Prophecy Preachers, is now available from Ignatius Press. It has been described as "extraordinary" by novelist Michael O'Brien, and "wonderful" by EWTN's Fr. Mitch Pacwa.
Heather and I have one daughter, Felicity, who we adopted in December 2000. We live in Eugene, Oregon, which is known for its beautiful scenery, hippies, anarchist riots, great food and beer, and political and social extremes.
Marty has appeared as a guest of Marcu Grodi, on The Journey Home. He is also the author of
"The Second Exodus book is the primary source of Second Exodus information. It contains more solid teaching about the Catholic faith than this entire web site. However, I love this Catholic faith so passionately that I have to share with you much that was outside the book's primary theme, the Israelite heritage of the Catholic Church, or that was simply more Israelite heritage material than I could fit into my self-imposed limit of 400 pages."
Marty's conversion story is a MUST read!
A "friendly" competition with Patrick Madrid and his family? Gerry Matatics is a friend of our fellow freeper, drstevej.
Also a chance to ask your own question!!!
True, to a point. God alone is the judge of our souls. However, to be Catholic one must ascent to the rightful and proper authority of the Church. In far too many cases the Jesuits have cast off the authority of the Church in favor of their own particular worldview: an entirely Protestant practice. Obviously I'm employing a bit of hyperbole here but I do have serious doubts as to the loyalty of many Jesuits to the Church and hence their loyalty to Christ.
Nope, hence my reference to hyperbole in my post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.